Literature DB >> 32551420

Validation of prognostic scoring systems for predicting 30-day mortality in perforated peptic ulcer disease.

Shaili Patel1, Devanshu Kalra1, Samir Kacheriwala1, Mihir Shah1, Dipesh Duttaroy1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Perforations in Peptic Ulcer Disease are known to cause considerable morbidity and mortality. The objective of this study was to compare efficacy of known clinical parameters and three existing scoring systems in predicting 30-day mortality and determining mortality risk stratification based on risk factors.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: This was a prospective observational study of 190 patients operated for perforated peptic ulcer over a period of 14 months at a 1500 bed tertiary care university hospital in Western India.
RESULTS: The mortality rate observed was 18.95%. Elderly population, raised serum creatinine, time delay to surgery > 24 hours, preoperative shock and pre-existing medical illness were identified as risk factors for poor postoperative prognosis. The Area under curve for mortality prediction was 0.590 for ASA, 0.745 for Boey and 0.804 for PULP score. Mortality was best anticipated by a combination of raised serum creatinine levels, preoperative shock and delayed surgery by multivariate logistic regression analysis.
CONCLUSION: Poor outcome was significantly higher in the elderly, patients with raised serum creatinine, preoperative shock, pre-existing medical illness and when the time delay to surgery was > 24 hours. In spite of the Boey score being more practical in application, PULP score proved to be a more precise indicator of mortality. A larger study inclusive of other Mortality Risk Prediction Models would help formulate a more accurate and population specific scoring system.
Copyright © 2019, Turkish Surgical Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  30-day mortality; Perforated peptic ulcer; risk factors; scoring systems

Year:  2019        PMID: 32551420      PMCID: PMC7282445          DOI: 10.5578/turkjsurg.4211

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Turk J Surg        ISSN: 2564-6850


  16 in total

1.  Variability in the American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status Classification Scale.

Authors:  Wendy L Aronson; Maura S McAuliffe; Ken Miller
Journal:  AANA J       Date:  2003-08

Review 2.  American gastroenterological association technical review on the evaluation of dyspepsia.

Authors:  Nicholas J Talley; Nimish B Vakil; Paul Moayyedi
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 22.682

3.  Five year experience in management of perforated peptic ulcer and validation of common mortality risk prediction models - are existing models sufficient? A retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  K Anbalakan; D Chua; G J Pandya; V G Shelat
Journal:  Int J Surg       Date:  2015-01-02       Impact factor: 6.071

4.  The ASA Physical Status Classification: inter-observer consistency. American Society of Anesthesiologists.

Authors:  P H K Mak; R C H Campbell; M G Irwin
Journal:  Anaesth Intensive Care       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 1.669

5.  Time trends in epidemiology of peptic ulcer disease in India over two decades.

Authors:  Amit Kumar Dutta; Ashok Chacko; Avinash Balekuduru; Manoj Kumar Sahu; Sajith Kattiparambil Gangadharan
Journal:  Indian J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-07-06

Review 6.  Complications of peptic ulcer disease.

Authors:  Tomica Milosavljevic; Mirjana Kostić-Milosavljević; Ivan Jovanović; Miodrag Krstić
Journal:  Dig Dis       Date:  2011-11-16       Impact factor: 2.404

7.  Risk factors for peptic ulcer disease: a population based prospective cohort study comprising 2416 Danish adults.

Authors:  S Rosenstock; T Jørgensen; O Bonnevie; L Andersen
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 23.059

8.  What is the best predictor of mortality in perforated peptic ulcer disease? A population-based, multivariable regression analysis including three clinical scoring systems.

Authors:  Kenneth Thorsen; Jon Arne Søreide; Kjetil Søreide
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2014-03-08       Impact factor: 3.452

9.  A practical scoring system to predict mortality in patients with perforated peptic ulcer.

Authors:  Ebru Menekse; Belma Kocer; Ramazan Topcu; Aydemir Olmez; Mesut Tez; Cuneyt Kayaalp
Journal:  World J Emerg Surg       Date:  2015-02-21       Impact factor: 5.469

Review 10.  Scoring systems for outcome prediction in patients with perforated peptic ulcer.

Authors:  Kenneth Thorsen; Jon Arne Søreide; Kjetil Søreide
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2013-04-10       Impact factor: 2.953

View more
  3 in total

1.  Risk factors for leak after omentopexy for duodenal ulcer perforations.

Authors:  Poornima Dogra; Robin Kaushik; Simrandeep Singh; Sushma Bhardwaj
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2022-07-23       Impact factor: 2.374

2.  A Comparative Study between Peptic Ulcer Perforation Score, Mannheim Peritonitis Index, ASA Score, and Jabalpur Score in Predicting the Mortality in Perforated Peptic Ulcers.

Authors:  Aboli Koranne; K G Byakodi; Vasant Teggimani; Vijay V Kamat; Abhijith Hiregoudar
Journal:  Surg J (N Y)       Date:  2022-08-02

3.  Psychological effect of comprehensive nursing intervention in elderly patients with perforated peptic ulcer: A protocol of systematic review.

Authors:  Bing Chen; Xiu-Yu Liu; Hong-Mei Zhang; Bai-Jun Zhang; Ying-Ting Wang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-09-25       Impact factor: 1.817

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.