Literature DB >> 25371298

The selective use of laparoscopic repair is safe in high-risk patients suffering from perforated peptic ulcer.

Anthony Yuen Bun Teoh1, Philip Wai Yan Chiu, Amy Siu Yan Kok, Simon Kin Hung Wong, Enders Kwok Wai Ng.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The use of laparoscopic repair for perforated peptic ulcer (PPU) was shown to be safe and recommended in low-risk patients. However, whether the approach is safe to apply to high-risk patients is uncertain. STUDY
DESIGN: This was a retrospective study of all patients with PPU admitted between January 2002 and December 2012. The laparoscopy-first approach (LFA) was adopted as a routine for all patients. The outcomes of LFA for PPU were reviewed and assessed to determine if the approach was safe in high-risk patients.
RESULTS: Three hundred and seventy three patients that suffered from PPU were included into the study and 50.9% received laparoscopic repair. There was a significant increase in the number of operations performed yearly by the LFA (P < 0.001). 25.2% of the patients had a Boey score of ≥2. High-risk patients that received LFA suffered from larger ulcers (P < 0.001) with more severe contamination (P = 0.006) that required conversion (P = 0.002) when compared to the low-risk patients. When compared to open surgery, more high-risk patients in the open group had ASA grade ≥3 (P = 0.007) and suffered from mortality (P = 0.001). The only significant predictor to mortality in high-risk patients was ASA grade ≥3 (P = 0.014).
CONCLUSIONS: The adoption of LFA in patients suffering from PPU was associated with acceptable rates of mortality and morbidity. The approach could also be selectively adopted in patients with Boey score ≥2 provided their ASA grading is low and hemodynamically stable.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25371298     DOI: 10.1007/s00268-014-2851-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Surg        ISSN: 0364-2313            Impact factor:   3.352


  22 in total

1.  Laparoscopic approach to acute abdomen from the Consensus Development Conference of the Società Italiana di Chirurgia Endoscopica e nuove tecnologie (SICE), Associazione Chirurghi Ospedalieri Italiani (ACOI), Società Italiana di Chirurgia (SIC), Società Italiana di Chirurgia d'Urgenza e del Trauma (SICUT), Società Italiana di Chirurgia nell'Ospedalità Privata (SICOP), and the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery (EAES).

Authors:  Ferdinando Agresta; Luca Ansaloni; Gian Luca Baiocchi; Carlo Bergamini; Fabio Cesare Campanile; Michele Carlucci; Giafranco Cocorullo; Alessio Corradi; Boris Franzato; Massimo Lupo; Vincenzo Mandalà; Antonino Mirabella; Graziano Pernazza; Micaela Piccoli; Carlo Staudacher; Nereo Vettoretto; Mauro Zago; Emanuele Lettieri; Anna Levati; Domenico Pietrini; Mariano Scaglione; Salvatore De Masi; Giuseppe De Placido; Marsilio Francucci; Monica Rasi; Abe Fingerhut; Selman Uranüs; Silvio Garattini
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-06-27       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  Eradication therapy for peptic ulcer disease in Helicobacter pylori positive patients.

Authors:  A C Ford; B C Delaney; D Forman; P Moayyedi
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2006-04-19

Review 3.  Systematic review of the epidemiology of complicated peptic ulcer disease: incidence, recurrence, risk factors and mortality.

Authors:  James Y Lau; Joseph Sung; Catherine Hill; Catherine Henderson; Colin W Howden; David C Metz
Journal:  Digestion       Date:  2011-04-14       Impact factor: 3.216

4.  Laparoscopic repair for perforated peptic ulcer: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Wing T Siu; Heng T Leong; Bonita K B Law; Chun H Chau; Anthony C N Li; Kai H Fung; Yuk P Tai; Michael K W Li
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Comparison of laparoscopic versus open repair for perforated duodenal ulcers.

Authors:  R Lunevicius; M Morkevicius
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-10-05       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Single stitch laparoscopic omental patch repair of perforated peptic ulcer.

Authors:  W T Siu; H T Leong; M K Li
Journal:  J R Coll Surg Edinb       Date:  1997-04

7.  Management of the difficult duodenal stump in penetrating duodenal ulcer disease: a comparative analysis of duodenojejunostomy with "classical" stump closure (Nissen-Bsteh).

Authors:  Yogesh K Vashist; Emre F Yekebas; Florian Gebauer; Michael Tachezy; Kai Bachmann; Alexandra König; Asad Kutup; Jakob R Izbicki
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2012-08-19       Impact factor: 3.445

8.  A prospective study of operative risk factors in perforated duodenal ulcers.

Authors:  J Boey; J Wong; G B Ong
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1982-03       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  Analysis of risk factors for postoperative morbidity in perforated peptic ulcer.

Authors:  Jae-Myung Kim; Sang-Ho Jeong; Young-Joon Lee; Soon-Tae Park; Sang-Kyung Choi; Soon-Chan Hong; Eun-Jung Jung; Young-Tae Ju; Chi-Young Jeong; Woo-Song Ha
Journal:  J Gastric Cancer       Date:  2012-03-30       Impact factor: 3.720

Review 10.  Laparoscopic correction of perforated peptic ulcer: first choice? A review of literature.

Authors:  Mariëtta J O E Bertleff; Johan F Lange
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-12-24       Impact factor: 4.584

View more
  7 in total

1.  Perforated Peptic Ulcer Repair: Factors Predicting Conversion in Laparoscopy and Postoperative Septic Complications.

Authors:  Markus K Muller; Simon Wrann; Jeannette Widmer; Jennifer Klasen; Markus Weber; Dieter Hahnloser
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Laparoscopy in Acute Care Surgery: Repair of Perforated Duodenal Ulcer.

Authors:  Mohammad H Jamal; Abdulazeez Karam; Nourah Alsharqawi; Abdulla Buhamra; Ibtesam AlBader; Jasem Al-Abbad; Mohammad Dashti; Yaser B Abulhasan; Husain Almahmeed; Salman AlSabah
Journal:  Med Princ Pract       Date:  2019-04-16       Impact factor: 1.927

3.  Laparoscopic versus open repair of perforated peptic ulcers: analysis of outcomes and identification of predictive factors of conversion.

Authors:  Dario Tartaglia; Silvia Strambi; Federico Coccolini; Alessio Mazzoni; Mario Miccoli; Camilla Cremonini; Enrico Cicuttin; Massimo Chiarugi
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2022-10-03

4.  Laparoscopic repair of perforated peptic ulcer: a multicenter, propensity score matching analysis.

Authors:  Chang Woo Kim; Jong Wan Kim; Sang Nam Yoon; Bo Young Oh; Byung Mo Kang
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2022-06-16       Impact factor: 2.030

5.  A comparison of short-term outcomes between laparoscopic and open emergent repair of perforated peptic ulcers.

Authors:  Daniel L Davenport; Walker R Ueland; Shyanie Kumar; Margaret Plymale; Andrew C Bernard; J Scott Roth
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-07-11       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Assessment of PULP score in predicting 30-day perforated duodenal ulcer morbidity, and comparison of its performance with Boey and ASA, a retrospective study.

Authors:  Tamer Saafan; Walid El Ansari; Omer Al-Yahri; Ammar Eleter; Hisham Eljohary; Rashad Alfkey; Mustafa Hajjar; Ali Toffaha; Abdelrahman El Osta
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2019-05-10

7.  Comparison of laparoscopic surgery versus traditional laparotomy for the treatment of emergency patients.

Authors:  Ning Cui; Jun Liu; Haiyan Tan
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2019-12-18       Impact factor: 1.671

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.