Literature DB >> 23372356

Epidemiology of perforated peptic ulcer: age- and gender-adjusted analysis of incidence and mortality.

Kenneth Thorsen1, Jon Arne Søreide, Jan Terje Kvaløy, Tom Glomsaker, Kjetil Søreide.   

Abstract

AIM: To investigate the epidemiological trends in incidence and mortality of perforated peptic ulcer (PPU) in a well-defined Norwegian population.
METHODS: A retrospective, population-based, single-center, consecutive cohort study of all patients diagnosed with benign perforated peptic ulcer. Included were both gastric and duodenal ulcer patients admitted to Stavanger University Hospital between January 2001 and December 2010. Ulcers with a malignant neoplasia diagnosis, verified by histology after biopsy or resection, were excluded. Patients were identified from the hospitals administrative electronic database using pertinent ICD-9 and ICD-10 codes (K25.1, K25.2, K25.5, K25.6, K26.1, K26.2, K26.5, K26.6). Additional searches using appropriate codes for relevant laparoscopic and open surgical procedures (e.g., JDA 60, JDA 61, JDH 70 and JDH 71) were performed to enable a complete identification of all patients. Patient demographics, presentation patterns and clinical data were retrieved from hospital records and surgical notes. Crude and adjusted incidence and mortality rates were estimated by using national population demographics data.
RESULTS: In the study period, a total of 172 patients with PPU were identified. The adjusted incidence rate for the overall 10-year period was 6.5 per 100 000 per year (95%CI: 5.6-7.6) and the adjusted mortality rate for the overall 10-year period was 1.1 per 100 000 per year (95%CI: 0.7-1.6). A non-significant decline in adjusted incidence rate from 9.7 to 5.6 occurred during the decade. The standardized mortality ratio for the whole study period was 5.7 (95%CI: 3.9-8.2), while the total 30-d mortality was 16.3%. No difference in incidence or mortality was found between genders. However, for patients ≥ 60 years, the incidence increased over 10-fold, and mortality more than 50-fold, compared to younger ages. The admission rates outside office hours were high with almost two out of three (63%) admissions seen at evening/night time shifts and/or during weekends. The observed seasonal variations in admissions were not statistically significant.
CONCLUSION: The adjusted incidence rate, seasonal distribution and mortality rate was stable. PPU frequently presents outside regular work-hours. Increase in incidence and mortality occurs with older age.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Epidemiology; Incidence; Mortality; Perforated peptic ulcer; Seasonal variation

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23372356      PMCID: PMC3554818          DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i3.347

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 1007-9327            Impact factor:   5.742


  35 in total

Review 1.  Trends in perforated peptic ulcer: incidence, etiology, treatment, and prognosis.

Authors:  C Svanes
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 2.  Surgery for peptic ulcer today. A study on the incidence, methods and mortality in surgery for peptic ulcer in Finland between 1987 and 1999.

Authors:  H Paimela; N K J Oksala; E Kivilaakso
Journal:  Dig Surg       Date:  2004-07-07       Impact factor: 2.588

3.  Meta-analysis of risk factors for peptic ulcer. Nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs, Helicobacter pylori, and smoking.

Authors:  J H Kurata; A N Nogawa
Journal:  J Clin Gastroenterol       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 3.062

4.  Smoking and alcohol intake as risk factors for bleeding and perforated peptic ulcers: a population-based cohort study.

Authors:  I B Andersen; T Jørgensen; O Bonnevie; M Grønbaek; T I Sørensen
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 4.822

5.  Perforated peptic ulcer--time trends and patterns over 20 years.

Authors:  J Janik; P Chwirot
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2000 Mar-Apr

6.  Complicated and uncomplicated peptic ulcers in a Danish county 1993-2002: a population-based cohort study.

Authors:  Annmarie Lassen; Jesper Hallas; Ove B Schaffalitzky de Muckadell
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 10.864

7.  Results of surgery for perforated gastroduodenal ulcers in a Dutch population.

Authors:  P H J Hemmer; J S de Schipper; B van Etten; J P E N Pierie; J J Bonenkamp; P W de Graaf; T M Karsten
Journal:  Dig Surg       Date:  2011-11-12       Impact factor: 2.588

8.  Time trends of ulcer mortality in Europe.

Authors:  Amnon Sonnenberg
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2007-04-14       Impact factor: 22.682

9.  Changes in the localization of perforated peptic ulcer and its relation to gender and age of the patients throughout the last 45 years.

Authors:  Andrzej Wysocki; Piotr Budzyński; Jan Kulawik; Włodzimierz Drożdż
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 3.352

10.  Decreasing incidence of peptic ulcer complications after the introduction of the proton pump inhibitors, a study of the Swedish population from 1974-2002.

Authors:  Michael Hermansson; Anders Ekedahl; Jonas Ranstam; Thomas Zilling
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-04-20       Impact factor: 3.067

View more
  53 in total

1.  Predicting the amount of intraperitoneal fluid accumulation by computed tomography and its clinical use in patients with perforated peptic ulcer.

Authors:  Toru Ishiguro; Youichi Kumagai; Hiroyuki Baba; Yusuke Tajima; Hideko Imaizumi; Okihide Suzuki; Koki Kuwabara; Takeaki Matsuzawa; Jun Sobajima; Minoru Fukuchi; Keiichiro Ishibashi; Erito Mochiki; Hideyuki Ishida
Journal:  Int Surg       Date:  2014 Nov-Dec

2.  Weekly pattern of emergency room admissions for peptic ulcers: a population-based study.

Authors:  Li-Ting Kao; Ming-Chieh Tsai; Herng-Ching Lin; Femi Pai; Cha-Ze Lee
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-03-21       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 3.  [Duodenal ulcers, gastric ulcers and Helicobacter pylori].

Authors:  Peter Dovjak
Journal:  Z Gerontol Geriatr       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 1.281

4.  Long-Term Mortality in Patients Operated for Perforated Peptic Ulcer: Factors Limiting Longevity are Dominated by Older Age, Comorbidity Burden and Severe Postoperative Complications.

Authors:  K Thorsen; J A Søreide; K Søreide
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  Association Between Subtotal Gastrectomy with Billroth II Anastomosis and Coronary Heart Disease.

Authors:  Chien-Hua Chen; Cheng-Li Lin; Yu-Shu Cheng; Long-Bin Jeng
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 4.129

6.  Treatment for perforated gastric ulcer: a multi-institutional retrospective review.

Authors:  Ryo Tanaka; Shin-ichi Kosugi; Kaoru Sakamoto; Kazuhito Yajima; Takashi Ishikawa; Tatsuo Kanda; Toshifumi Wakai
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2013-10-09       Impact factor: 3.452

7.  Low serum albumin may predict the need for gastric resection in patients with perforated peptic ulcer.

Authors:  J G Seow; Y R Lim; V G Shelat
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2016-04-13       Impact factor: 3.693

8.  Impact of Drain Insertion After Perforated Peptic Ulcer Repair in a Japanese Nationwide Database Analysis.

Authors:  K Okumura; K Hida; S Kunisawa; T Nishigori; H Hosogi; Y Sakai; Y Imanaka
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 3.352

9.  Gastric Ulcer Complications after the Introduction of Proton Pump Inhibitors into Clinical Routine: 20-Year Experience.

Authors:  Friederike Eisner; Diana Hermann; Khaled Bajaeifer; Jörg Glatzle; Alfred Königsrainer; Markus A Küper
Journal:  Visc Med       Date:  2017-06-16

Review 10.  Medical versus surgical treatment for refractory or recurrent peptic ulcer.

Authors:  Kurinchi Selvan Gurusamy; Elena Pallari
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-03-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.