Gislin Dagnelie1. 1. Lions Vision Research and Rehabilitation Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland 21205-2020, USA. gislin@lions.med.jhu.edu
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review summarizes the current status of retinal prostheses, recent accomplishments, and major remaining research, engineering, and rehabilitation challenges. RECENT FINDINGS: Retinal research, materials and biocompatibility studies, and clinical trials in patients blind from retinitis pigmentosa are representative of an emerging field with considerable promise and sobering challenges. A summary of progress in dozens of laboratories, companies, and clinics around the world is presented through a synopsis of relevant studies, not only to summarize the progress but also to convey the remarkable increase in interest, effort, and outside funding this field has enjoyed. SUMMARY: At present, clinical applications of retinal implant technology are dominated by one or two groups/companies, but the field is wide open for others to take the lead through novel approaches in technology, tissue interfacing, information transfer paradigms, and rehabilitation. Where the field will go in the next few years is almost anybody's guess, but that it will move forward is a certainty.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review summarizes the current status of retinal prostheses, recent accomplishments, and major remaining research, engineering, and rehabilitation challenges. RECENT FINDINGS: Retinal research, materials and biocompatibility studies, and clinical trials in patients blind from retinitis pigmentosa are representative of an emerging field with considerable promise and sobering challenges. A summary of progress in dozens of laboratories, companies, and clinics around the world is presented through a synopsis of relevant studies, not only to summarize the progress but also to convey the remarkable increase in interest, effort, and outside funding this field has enjoyed. SUMMARY: At present, clinical applications of retinal implant technology are dominated by one or two groups/companies, but the field is wide open for others to take the lead through novel approaches in technology, tissue interfacing, information transfer paradigms, and rehabilitation. Where the field will go in the next few years is almost anybody's guess, but that it will move forward is a certainty.
Authors: Chris Sekirnjak; Pawel Hottowy; Alexander Sher; Wladyslaw Dabrowski; Alan M Litke; E J Chichilnisky Journal: J Neurosci Date: 2008-04-23 Impact factor: 6.167
Authors: A K Ahuja; J D Dorn; A Caspi; M J McMahon; G Dagnelie; L Dacruz; P Stanga; M S Humayun; R J Greenberg Journal: Br J Ophthalmol Date: 2010-09-29 Impact factor: 4.638
Authors: James R Anderson; Bryan W Jones; Carl B Watt; Margaret V Shaw; Jia-Hui Yang; David Demill; James S Lauritzen; Yanhua Lin; Kevin D Rapp; David Mastronarde; Pavel Koshevoy; Bradley Grimm; Tolga Tasdizen; Ross Whitaker; Robert E Marc Journal: Mol Vis Date: 2011-02-03 Impact factor: 2.367
Authors: Alan Horsager; Scott H Greenwald; James D Weiland; Mark S Humayun; Robert J Greenberg; Matthew J McMahon; Geoffrey M Boynton; Ione Fine Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2008-12-20 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Eberhart Zrenner; Karl Ulrich Bartz-Schmidt; Heval Benav; Dorothea Besch; Anna Bruckmann; Veit-Peter Gabel; Florian Gekeler; Udo Greppmaier; Alex Harscher; Steffen Kibbel; Johannes Koch; Akos Kusnyerik; Tobias Peters; Katarina Stingl; Helmut Sachs; Alfred Stett; Peter Szurman; Barbara Wilhelm; Robert Wilke Journal: Proc Biol Sci Date: 2010-11-03 Impact factor: 5.349
Authors: Lauren H Jepson; Paweł Hottowy; Keith Mathieson; Deborah E Gunning; Władysław Dąbrowski; Alan M Litke; E J Chichilnisky Journal: J Neurosci Date: 2014-04-02 Impact factor: 6.167
Authors: Roksana Sadeghi; Arathy Kartha; Michael P Barry; Chris Bradley; Paul Gibson; Avi Caspi; Arup Roy; Gislin Dagnelie Journal: Vision Res Date: 2021-03-26 Impact factor: 1.984
Authors: Michael J Proulx; James Gwinnutt; Sara Dell'Erba; Shelly Levy-Tzedek; Alexandra A de Sousa; David J Brown Journal: Restor Neurol Neurosci Date: 2016 Impact factor: 2.406