Literature DB >> 22185902

Retinal implants: emergence of a multidisciplinary field.

Gislin Dagnelie1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review summarizes the current status of retinal prostheses, recent accomplishments, and major remaining research, engineering, and rehabilitation challenges. RECENT
FINDINGS: Retinal research, materials and biocompatibility studies, and clinical trials in patients blind from retinitis pigmentosa are representative of an emerging field with considerable promise and sobering challenges. A summary of progress in dozens of laboratories, companies, and clinics around the world is presented through a synopsis of relevant studies, not only to summarize the progress but also to convey the remarkable increase in interest, effort, and outside funding this field has enjoyed.
SUMMARY: At present, clinical applications of retinal implant technology are dominated by one or two groups/companies, but the field is wide open for others to take the lead through novel approaches in technology, tissue interfacing, information transfer paradigms, and rehabilitation. Where the field will go in the next few years is almost anybody's guess, but that it will move forward is a certainty.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22185902      PMCID: PMC3291121          DOI: 10.1097/WCO.0b013e32834f02c3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Opin Neurol        ISSN: 1350-7540            Impact factor:   5.710


  63 in total

1.  Use of the Argus II retinal prosthesis to improve visual guidance of fine hand movements.

Authors:  Michael P Barry; Gislin Dagnelie
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2012-08-01       Impact factor: 4.799

Review 2.  Preoperative candidate evaluations for retinal prosthesis trials.

Authors:  Yu Xia; Qiushi Ren
Journal:  Int J Artif Organs       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 1.595

3.  High-resolution electrical stimulation of primate retina for epiretinal implant design.

Authors:  Chris Sekirnjak; Pawel Hottowy; Alexander Sher; Wladyslaw Dabrowski; Alan M Litke; E J Chichilnisky
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-04-23       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Comparison of electrode materials for the use of retinal prosthesis.

Authors:  Niina Onnela; Hirotaka Takeshita; Yoshiuki Kaiho; Toshiya Kojima; Risato Kobayashi; Tetsu Tanaka; Jari Hyttinen
Journal:  Biomed Mater Eng       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 1.300

5.  Intraocular retinal prosthesis.

Authors:  M S Humayun
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  2001

6.  Blind subjects implanted with the Argus II retinal prosthesis are able to improve performance in a spatial-motor task.

Authors:  A K Ahuja; J D Dorn; A Caspi; M J McMahon; G Dagnelie; L Dacruz; P Stanga; M S Humayun; R J Greenberg
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-09-29       Impact factor: 4.638

7.  Exploring the retinal connectome.

Authors:  James R Anderson; Bryan W Jones; Carl B Watt; Margaret V Shaw; Jia-Hui Yang; David Demill; James S Lauritzen; Yanhua Lin; Kevin D Rapp; David Mastronarde; Pavel Koshevoy; Bradley Grimm; Tolga Tasdizen; Ross Whitaker; Robert E Marc
Journal:  Mol Vis       Date:  2011-02-03       Impact factor: 2.367

8.  Predicting visual sensitivity in retinal prosthesis patients.

Authors:  Alan Horsager; Scott H Greenwald; James D Weiland; Mark S Humayun; Robert J Greenberg; Matthew J McMahon; Geoffrey M Boynton; Ione Fine
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2008-12-20       Impact factor: 4.799

9.  Simulation of epiretinal prostheses - evaluation of geometrical factors affecting stimulation thresholds.

Authors:  Harsha Kasi; Willyan Hasenkamp; Gregoire Cosendai; Arnaud Bertsch; Philippe Renaud
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2011-08-19       Impact factor: 4.262

10.  Subretinal electronic chips allow blind patients to read letters and combine them to words.

Authors:  Eberhart Zrenner; Karl Ulrich Bartz-Schmidt; Heval Benav; Dorothea Besch; Anna Bruckmann; Veit-Peter Gabel; Florian Gekeler; Udo Greppmaier; Alex Harscher; Steffen Kibbel; Johannes Koch; Akos Kusnyerik; Tobias Peters; Katarina Stingl; Helmut Sachs; Alfred Stett; Peter Szurman; Barbara Wilhelm; Robert Wilke
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-11-03       Impact factor: 5.349

View more
  17 in total

1.  Proceedings of the First International Optogenetic Therapies for Vision Symposium.

Authors:  Peter J Francis; Brian Mansfield; Stephen Rose
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2013-11-21       Impact factor: 3.283

2.  Spatially patterned electrical stimulation to enhance resolution of retinal prostheses.

Authors:  Lauren H Jepson; Paweł Hottowy; Keith Mathieson; Deborah E Gunning; Władysław Dąbrowski; Alan M Litke; E J Chichilnisky
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-04-02       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Therapeutic Benefits from Nanoparticles: The Potential Significance of Nanoscience in Retinal Degenerative Diseases.

Authors:  Raju V S Rajala
Journal:  J Mol Biol Ther       Date:  2019

4.  Genetically modified neural stem cells for a local and sustained delivery of neuroprotective factors to the dystrophic mouse retina.

Authors:  Gila Jung; Jing Sun; Bettina Petrowitz; Kristoffer Riecken; Katharina Kruszewski; Wanda Jankowiak; Frank Kunst; Christos Skevas; Gisbert Richard; Boris Fehse; Udo Bartsch
Journal:  Stem Cells Transl Med       Date:  2013-10-28       Impact factor: 6.940

Review 5.  The functional performance of the Argus II retinal prosthesis.

Authors:  H Christiaan Stronks; Gislin Dagnelie
Journal:  Expert Rev Med Devices       Date:  2013-11-22       Impact factor: 3.166

6.  Glow in the dark: Using a heat-sensitive camera for blind individuals with prosthetic vision.

Authors:  Roksana Sadeghi; Arathy Kartha; Michael P Barry; Chris Bradley; Paul Gibson; Avi Caspi; Arup Roy; Gislin Dagnelie
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2021-03-26       Impact factor: 1.984

7.  Integration and binding in rehabilitative sensory substitution: Increasing resolution using a new Zooming-in approach.

Authors:  Galit Buchs; Shachar Maidenbaum; Shelly Levy-Tzedek; Amir Amedi
Journal:  Restor Neurol Neurosci       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 2.406

8.  Human umbilical cord blood stem cells and brain-derived neurotrophic factor for optic nerve injury: a biomechanical evaluation.

Authors:  Zhong-Jun Zhang; Ya-Jun Li; Xiao-Guang Liu; Feng-Xiao Huang; Tie-Jun Liu; Dong-Mei Jiang; Xue-Man Lv; Min Luo
Journal:  Neural Regen Res       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 5.135

9.  Human umbilical cord blood-derived stem cells and brain-derived neurotrophic factor protect injured optic nerve: viscoelasticity characterization.

Authors:  Xue-Man Lv; Yan Liu; Fei Wu; Yi Yuan; Min Luo
Journal:  Neural Regen Res       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 5.135

Review 10.  Other ways of seeing: From behavior to neural mechanisms in the online "visual" control of action with sensory substitution.

Authors:  Michael J Proulx; James Gwinnutt; Sara Dell'Erba; Shelly Levy-Tzedek; Alexandra A de Sousa; David J Brown
Journal:  Restor Neurol Neurosci       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 2.406

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.