| Literature DB >> 33780753 |
Roksana Sadeghi1, Arathy Kartha2, Michael P Barry3, Chris Bradley2, Paul Gibson4, Avi Caspi5, Arup Roy3, Gislin Dagnelie2.
Abstract
To date, retinal implants are the only available treatment for blind individuals with retinal degenerations such as retinitis pigmentosa. Argus II is the only visual implant with FDA approval, with more than 300 users worldwide. Argus II stimulation is based on a grayscale image coming from a head-mounted visible-light camera. Normally, the 11°×19° field of view of the Argus II user is full of objects that may elicit similar phosphenes. The prosthesis cannot meaningfully convey so much visual information, and the percept is reduced to an ambiguous impression of light. This study is aimed at investigating the efficacy of simplifying the video input in real-time using a heat-sensitive camera. Data were acquired from four Argus II users in 5 stationary tasks with either hot objects or human targets as stimuli. All tasks were of m-alternative forced choice design where precisely one of the m≥2 response alternatives was defined to be "correct" by the experimenter. To compare performance with heat-sensitive and normal cameras across all tasks, regardless of m, we used an extension of signal detection theory to latent variables, estimating person ability and item difficulty in d' units. Results demonstrate that subject performance was significantly better across all tasks with the thermal camera compared to the regular Argus II camera. The future addition of thermal imaging to devices with very poor spatial resolution may have significant real-life benefits for orientation, personal safety, and social interactions, thereby improving quality of life.Entities:
Keywords: Activities of daily living; M-alternative forced choice; Performance measures; Psychophysics; Retinal implant; Thermal camera
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33780753 PMCID: PMC8137663 DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2021.02.009
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Vision Res ISSN: 0042-6989 Impact factor: 1.984