Literature DB >> 22183831

What is a "balanced" description? Insight from parents of individuals with down syndrome.

Catriona Hippman1, Angela Inglis, Jehannine Austin.   

Abstract

Genetic counselors and parents of individuals with Down syndrome (DS) agree that descriptions of DS in prenatal settings should be "balanced." However, there is no consensus regarding what constitutes a balanced description of DS. A survey was designed in collaboration with, and sent to the membership of, the British Columbia based Lower Mainland Down Syndrome Society (N = 260). Respondents were asked how they would describe DS to a couple who have just received a prenatal diagnosis of the condition. We rated the descriptions provided for positivity/negativity. Completed surveys were returned by 101 members, the majority of whom were Caucasian (87%) and female (79%). Participants' descriptions of DS ranged from entirely positive (n = 5; 10%) to entirely negative (n = 4; 7%) in nature. Deriving a description of DS that would broadly be perceived as "balanced" may be impossible. Instead, it may be more important to explore the range of possibilities regarding the family experience of raising a child with DS using nonjudgmental terminology, and to help families evaluate these possibilities in the context of their own values, coping strategies, and support networks.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22183831      PMCID: PMC3706329          DOI: 10.1007/s10897-011-9417-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Genet Couns        ISSN: 1059-7700            Impact factor:   2.537


  19 in total

1.  Descriptive information about Down syndrome: a content analysis of serum screening leaflets.

Authors:  L D Bryant; J Murray; J M Green; J Hewison; I Sehmi; A Ellis
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 3.050

2.  Genetics services in a social, ethical and policy context: a collaboration between consumers and providers.

Authors:  D C Wertz; R Gregg
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 2.903

3.  Psychosocial genetic counseling in the post-nondirective era: a point of view.

Authors:  Jon Weil
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 2.537

4.  The Genetic Counseling Video Project (GCVP): models of practice.

Authors:  D Roter; L Ellington; L Hamby Erby; S Larson; W Dudley
Journal:  Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet       Date:  2006-11-15       Impact factor: 3.908

5.  Practice guidelines for communicating a prenatal or postnatal diagnosis of Down syndrome: recommendations of the national society of genetic counselors.

Authors:  Kathryn B Sheets; Blythe G Crissman; Cori D Feist; Susan L Sell; Lisa R Johnson; Kelly C Donahue; Diane Masser-Frye; Gail S Brookshire; Amanda M Carre; Danielle Lagrave; Campbell K Brasington
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2011-05-27       Impact factor: 2.537

6.  Prenatal diagnosis of Down syndrome: mothers' reflections on supports needed from diagnosis to birth.

Authors:  D T Helm; S Miranda; N A Chedd
Journal:  Ment Retard       Date:  1998-02

Review 7.  The relationship between the genetic counseling profession and the disability community: a commentary.

Authors:  Anne C Madeo; Barbara B Biesecker; Campbell Brasington; Lori H Erby; Kathryn F Peters
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2011-05-12       Impact factor: 2.802

Review 8.  Supporting the family of the newborn with Down syndrome.

Authors:  W C Cooley
Journal:  Compr Ther       Date:  1993

9.  What constitutes 'balanced' information in the practitioners' portrayals of Down's syndrome?

Authors:  Clare Williams; Priscilla Alderson; Bobbie Farsides
Journal:  Midwifery       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 2.372

10.  Prenatally diagnosed Down syndrome: mothers who continued their pregnancies evaluate their health care providers.

Authors:  Brian G Skotko
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 8.661

View more
  7 in total

1.  Community-engagement strategies of the developmental disabilities practice-based research network (DD-PBRN).

Authors:  Carl V Tyler; James J Werner
Journal:  J Am Board Fam Med       Date:  2014 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.657

2.  Family Sense-Making After a Down Syndrome Diagnosis.

Authors:  Lauren Clark; Heather E Canary; Kyle McDougle; Rebekah Perkins; Ruth Tadesse; Avery E Holton
Journal:  Qual Health Res       Date:  2020-07-03

3.  Using ethnodrama to support parents in sense-making after prenatal or neonatal diagnosis of a child's disabling condition.

Authors:  Jacqueline Eaton; Sydney Cheek-O'Donnell; Erin Johnson; Lauren Clark
Journal:  J Appl Res Intellect Disabil       Date:  2021-10-27

4.  Disability Experiences and Perspectives Regarding Reproductive Decisions, Parenting, and the Utility of Genetic Services: a Qualitative Study.

Authors:  C Roadhouse; C Shuman; K Anstey; K Sappleton; D Chitayat; E Ignagni
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2018-06-16       Impact factor: 2.537

5.  A 'cure' for Down syndrome: what do parents want?

Authors:  A Inglis; Z Lohn; J C Austin; C Hippman
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  2014-03-21       Impact factor: 4.438

6.  "Yeah that Made a Big Difference!": The Importance of the Relationship between Health Professionals and Fathers Who Have a Child with Down Syndrome.

Authors:  Freyja Docherty; Rebecca Dimond
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2017-11-20       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 7.  Non-invasive prenatal testing for fetal chromosome abnormalities: review of clinical and ethical issues.

Authors:  Jean Gekas; Sylvie Langlois; Vardit Ravitsky; François Audibert; David Gradus van den Berg; Hazar Haidar; François Rousseau
Journal:  Appl Clin Genet       Date:  2016-02-04
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.