Literature DB >> 10951921

Genetics services in a social, ethical and policy context: a collaboration between consumers and providers.

D C Wertz1, R Gregg.   

Abstract

We report a unique, collaborative effort by users and providers of genetic services to arrive at outlines for optimal ethics and clinical practice. Using focus groups of consumers (users) and providers (held separately), a provider-consumer project team developed 1) a consumer wish list, 2) an experientially based ethical overview of situations arising in practice, and 3) detailed suggestions for consumer-provider interactions in clinical settings. Consumers were primarily interested in accurate information, respect for persons, a smoothly functioning team, with the consumer as an equal member of the team, family integrity, and providers who knew the limits of their knowledge and were willing to refer. "Non-directive" counselling and privacy were not major issues in consumer focus groups; some thought providers should openly state their own opinions. Providers had a rather different list of priorities. Books and papers on clinical ethics usually originate from bioethicists and physicians. This pilot project is unique in including consumers and providers equally.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Genetics and Reproduction

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10951921      PMCID: PMC1733266          DOI: 10.1136/jme.26.4.261

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Ethics        ISSN: 0306-6800            Impact factor:   2.903


  4 in total

1.  Genetic medicine: an experiment in community-expert interaction.

Authors:  R Schibeci; I Barns; R Shaw; A Davison
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 2.903

2.  The difficulties of recruiting minorities to studies of ethics and values in genetics.

Authors:  Dorothy C Wertz
Journal:  Community Genet       Date:  1998

Review 3.  The rise of doctor-patient working groups.

Authors:  C Williamson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-11-14

Review 4.  Society and the not-so-new genetics: what are we afraid of? Some future predictions from a social scientist.

Authors:  D C Wertz
Journal:  J Contemp Health Law Policy       Date:  1997
  4 in total
  6 in total

1.  Community involvement in developing policies for genetic testing: assessing the interests and experiences of individuals affected by genetic conditions.

Authors:  Sarah E Gollust; Kira Apse; Barbara P Fuller; Paul Steven Miller; Barbara B Biesecker
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 2.  The relationship between the genetic counseling profession and the disability community: a commentary.

Authors:  Anne C Madeo; Barbara B Biesecker; Campbell Brasington; Lori H Erby; Kathryn F Peters
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2011-05-12       Impact factor: 2.802

3.  What is a "balanced" description? Insight from parents of individuals with down syndrome.

Authors:  Catriona Hippman; Angela Inglis; Jehannine Austin
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2011-12-20       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 4.  The complexity and challenges of genetic counseling and testing for inflammatory bowel disease.

Authors:  Shelly A Cummings; David T Rubin
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 2.537

5.  Are good intentions good enough? Informed consent without trained interpreters.

Authors:  Linda M Hunt; Katherine B de Voogd
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2007-03-02       Impact factor: 5.128

6.  Attitudes toward Genetic Testing for Hypertension among African American Women and Girls.

Authors:  Jacquelyn Y Taylor; Bronwen Peternell; Jennifer A Smith
Journal:  Nurs Res Pract       Date:  2013-11-02
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.