Literature DB >> 16941666

The Genetic Counseling Video Project (GCVP): models of practice.

D Roter1, L Ellington, L Hamby Erby, S Larson, W Dudley.   

Abstract

Genetic counseling is conceptualized as having both "teaching" and "counseling" functions; however, little is known about how these functions are articulated in routine practice. This study addresses the question by documenting, on videotape, the practices of a national sample of prenatal and cancer genetic counselors (GCs) providing routine pre-test counseling to simulated clients (SCs). One hundred and seventy-seven GCs recruited at two annual conferences of the National Society of Genetic Counselors (NSGC) were randomly assigned to counsel one of six female SCs of varying ethnicity, with or without a spouse, in their specialty. One hundred and fifty-two videotapes were coded with the Roter Interaction Analysis System (RIAS) and both GCs and SCs completed evaluative questionnaires. Two teaching and two counseling patterns of practice emerged from cluster analysis. The teaching patterns included: (1) clinical teaching (31%) characterized by low psychosocial, emotional and facilitative talk, high levels of clinical exchange, and high verbal dominance; and (2) psycho-educational teaching (27%) characterized by high levels of both clinical and psychosocial exchange, low levels of emotional and facilitative talk, and higher verbal dominance. The counseling patterns included: (1) supportive counseling (33%) characterized by low psychosocial and clinical exchange, high levels of emotional and facilitative talk, and low verbal dominance; and (2) psychosocial counseling (9%) with high emotional and facilitative talk, low clinical and high psychosocial exchange, and the lowest verbal dominance. SCs ratings of satisfaction with communication, the counselor's affective demeanor, and the counselor's use of non-verbal skills were highest for the counseling model sessions. Both the teaching and counseling models seem to be represented in routine practice and predict variation in client satisfaction, affective demeanor, and nonverbal effectiveness. (c) 2006 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16941666      PMCID: PMC2766799          DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.c.30094

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet        ISSN: 1552-4868            Impact factor:   3.908


  23 in total

Review 1.  The enduring and evolving nature of the patient-physician relationship.

Authors:  D Roter
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2000-01

Review 2.  Genetic testing and counseling for hereditary forms of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  G M Petersen; J D Brensinger; K A Johnson; F M Giardiello
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1999-12-01       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  Practice-based competencies for accreditation of and training in graduate programs in genetic counseling.

Authors:  B A Fine; D L Baker; M B Fiddler
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 4.  Meta-analysis of correlates of provider behavior in medical encounters.

Authors:  J A Hall; D L Roter; N R Katz
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 2.983

5.  Communication of affect between patient and physician.

Authors:  J A Hall; D L Roter; C S Rand
Journal:  J Health Soc Behav       Date:  1981-03

6.  Psychological aspects of genetic counseling: analysis of a transcript.

Authors:  S Kessler
Journal:  Am J Med Genet       Date:  1981

7.  Communication patterns of primary care physicians.

Authors:  D L Roter; M Stewart; S M Putnam; M Lipkin; W Stiles; T S Inui
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1997 Jan 22-29       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Communication patterns of primary care physicians in the United States and the Netherlands.

Authors:  Jozien M Bensing; Debra L Roter; Robert L Hulsman
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 5.128

9.  Communication in cancer genetic counselling: does it reflect counselees' previsit needs and preferences?

Authors:  A H Pieterse; A M van Dulmen; M G E M Ausems; F A Beemer; J M Bensing
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2005-05-09       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Tailoring communication in consultations with women from high risk breast cancer families.

Authors:  E A Lobb; P N Butow; B Meiser; A Barratt; C Gaff; M A Young; J Kirk; G K Suthers; K Tucker
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2002-08-27       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  46 in total

1.  A new definition of Genetic Counseling: National Society of Genetic Counselors' Task Force report.

Authors:  Robert Resta; Barbara Bowles Biesecker; Robin L Bennett; Sandra Blum; Susan Estabrooks Hahn; Michelle N Strecker; Janet L Williams
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  Genetic counseling communication with an African American BRCA1 kindred.

Authors:  Lee Ellington; Amiee Maxwel; Bonnie J Baty; Debra Roter; William N Dudley; Anita Y Kinney
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2006-11-01       Impact factor: 4.634

3.  Examination of standardized patient performance: accuracy and consistency of six standardized patients over time.

Authors:  Lori A H Erby; Debra L Roter; Barbara B Biesecker
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2010-11-20

4.  Coming full circle: a reciprocal-engagement model of genetic counseling practice.

Authors:  Patricia McCarthy Veach; Dianne M Bartels; Bonnie S Leroy
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2007-10-13       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 5.  Assessment of the content and process of genetic counseling: a critical review of empirical studies.

Authors:  Bettina Meiser; Jennifer Irle; Elizabeth Lobb; Kristine Barlow-Stewart
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2008-09-13       Impact factor: 2.537

6.  Preferences regarding targeted education and risk assessment in people with a family history of major depressive disorder.

Authors:  Veronica Quinn; Bettina Meiser; Alex Wilde; Zoe Cousins; Kristine Barlow-Stewart; Philip B Mitchell; Peter R Schofield
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2014-01-10       Impact factor: 2.537

7.  An exploration of genetic counselors' needs and experiences with prenatal chromosomal microarray testing.

Authors:  Barbara A Bernhardt; Katherine Kellom; Alexandra Barbarese; W Andrew Faucett; Ronald J Wapner
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2014-02-27       Impact factor: 2.537

8.  Disclosing genetic risk of Alzheimer's disease to cognitively impaired patients and visit companions: Findings from the REVEAL Study.

Authors:  Yue Guan; Debra L Roter; Lori H Erby; Jennifer L Wolff; Laura N Gitlin; J Scott Roberts; Robert C Green; Kurt D Christensen
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2016-12-14

Review 9.  More than an information service: are counselling skills needed by genetics professionals in the genomic era?

Authors:  Heather Skirton
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2018-05-22       Impact factor: 4.246

10.  Cancer Genetic Counseling and Testing in an Era of Rapid Change.

Authors:  Gillian W Hooker; Keelia Rhoads Clemens; John Quillin; Kristen J Vogel Postula; Pia Summerour; Rebecca Nagy; Adam H Buchanan
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2017-04-22       Impact factor: 2.537

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.