Literature DB >> 27921197

Counselees' Perspectives of Genomic Counseling Following Online Receipt of Multiple Actionable Complex Disease and Pharmacogenomic Results: a Qualitative Research Study.

Kevin Sweet1, Shelly Hovick2, Amy C Sturm3,4, Tara Schmidlen5, Erynn Gordon6, Barbara Bernhardt7, Lisa Wawak5, Karen Wernke3, Joseph McElroy8, Laura Scheinfeldt5,9, Amanda E Toland3, J S Roberts10, Michael Christman5.   

Abstract

Genomic applications raise multiple challenges including the optimization of genomic counseling (GC) services as part of the results delivery process. More information on patients' motivations, preferences, and informational needs are essential to guide the development of new, more efficient practice delivery models that capitalize on the existing strengths of a limited genetic counseling workforce. Semi-structured telephone interviews were conducted with a subset of counselees from the Coriell Personalized Medicine Collaborative following online receipt of multiple personalized genomic test reports. Participants previously had either in-person GC (chronic disease cohort, n = 20; mean age 60 years) or telephone GC (community cohort, n = 31; mean age 46.8 years). Transcripts were analyzed using a Grounded Theory framework. Major themes that emerged from the interviews include 1) primary reasons for seeking GC were to clarify results, put results into perspective relative to other health-related concerns, and to receive personalized recommendations; 2) there is need for a more participant driven approach in terms of mode of GC communication (in-person, phone, video), and refining the counseling agenda pre-session; and 3) there was strong interest in the option of follow up GC. By clarifying counselees' expectations, views and desired outcomes, we have uncovered a need for a more participant-driven GC model when potentially actionable genomic results are received online.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Complex disease; Counseling; Genetic; Genomic; Practice models; Qualitative interviews; Service delivery

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27921197      PMCID: PMC5459668          DOI: 10.1007/s10897-016-0044-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Genet Couns        ISSN: 1059-7700            Impact factor:   2.537


  42 in total

1.  The prospect of genome-guided preventive medicine: a need and opportunity for genetic counselors.

Authors:  Julianne M O'Daniel
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2010-05-04       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  Coming full circle: a reciprocal-engagement model of genetic counseling practice.

Authors:  Patricia McCarthy Veach; Dianne M Bartels; Bonnie S Leroy
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2007-10-13       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 3.  Global implementation of genomic medicine: We are not alone.

Authors:  Teri A Manolio; Marc Abramowicz; Fahd Al-Mulla; Warwick Anderson; Rudi Balling; Adam C Berger; Steven Bleyl; Aravinda Chakravarti; Wasun Chantratita; Rex L Chisholm; Vajira H W Dissanayake; Michael Dunn; Victor J Dzau; Bok-Ghee Han; Tim Hubbard; Anne Kolbe; Bruce Korf; Michiaki Kubo; Paul Lasko; Erkki Leego; Surakameth Mahasirimongkol; Partha P Majumdar; Gert Matthijs; Howard L McLeod; Andres Metspalu; Pierre Meulien; Satoru Miyano; Yaakov Naparstek; P Pearl O'Rourke; George P Patrinos; Heidi L Rehm; Mary V Relling; Gad Rennert; Laura Lyman Rodriguez; Dan M Roden; Alan R Shuldiner; Sukdeb Sinha; Patrick Tan; Mats Ulfendahl; Robyn Ward; Marc S Williams; John E L Wong; Eric D Green; Geoffrey S Ginsburg
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2015-06-03       Impact factor: 17.956

4.  mHealth plus community health worker interventions: the future research agenda.

Authors:  Shiva Raj Mishra; Dinesh Neupane; Tom G Briffa; Per Kallestrup
Journal:  Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 32.069

5.  EMR documentation of physician-patient communication following genomic counseling for actionable complex disease and pharmacogenomic results.

Authors:  K Sweet; A C Sturm; T Schmidlen; S Hovick; J Peng; K Manickam; A Salikhova; J McElroy; L Scheinfeldt; A E Toland; J S Roberts; M Christman
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  2016-07-28       Impact factor: 4.438

6.  "It's not like judgment day": public understanding of and reactions to personalized genomic risk information.

Authors:  Erynn S Gordon; Georgia Griffin; Lisa Wawak; Hauchie Pang; Sarah E Gollust; Barbara A Bernhardt
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2011-12-17       Impact factor: 2.537

7.  Personalized genomic results: analysis of informational needs.

Authors:  Tara J Schmidlen; Lisa Wawak; Rachel Kasper; J Felipe García-España; Michael F Christman; Erynn S Gordon
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2014-02-03       Impact factor: 2.537

8.  Patients' understanding of and responses to multiplex genetic susceptibility test results.

Authors:  Kimberly A Kaphingst; Colleen M McBride; Christopher Wade; Sharon Hensley Alford; Robert Reid; Eric Larson; Andreas D Baxevanis; Lawrence C Brody
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 8.822

9.  Moving toward NextGenetic counseling.

Authors:  Myra I Roche
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2012-07-12       Impact factor: 8.822

Review 10.  The impact of communicating genetic risks of disease on risk-reducing health behaviour: systematic review with meta-analysis.

Authors:  Gareth J Hollands; David P French; Simon J Griffin; A Toby Prevost; Stephen Sutton; Sarah King; Theresa M Marteau
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2016-03-15
View more
  7 in total

1.  Operationalizing the Reciprocal Engagement Model of Genetic Counseling Practice: a Framework for the Scalable Delivery of Genomic Counseling and Testing.

Authors:  Tara Schmidlen; Amy C Sturm; Shelly Hovick; Laura Scheinfeldt; J Scott Roberts; Lindsey Morr; Joseph McElroy; Amanda E Toland; Michael Christman; Julianne M O'Daniel; Erynn S Gordon; Barbara A Bernhardt; Kelly E Ormond; Kevin Sweet
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2018-02-19       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  Clinician-Stakeholders' Perspectives on Using Patient Portals to Return Lynch Syndrome Screening Results.

Authors:  Diane M Korngiebel; Kathleen M West; Wylie Burke
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2017-11-21       Impact factor: 2.537

3.  A stepwise approach to implementing pharmacogenetic testing in the primary care setting.

Authors:  Kristin Wiisanen Weitzel; Benjamin Q Duong; Meghan J Arwood; Aniwaa Owusu-Obeng; Noura S Abul-Husn; Barbara A Bernhardt; Brian Decker; Joshua C Denny; Eric Dietrich; John Gums; Ebony B Madden; Toni I Pollin; Rebekah Ryanne Wu; Susanne B Haga; Carol R Horowitz
Journal:  Pharmacogenomics       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 2.533

Review 4.  Genetic Counseling, Personalized Medicine, and Precision Health.

Authors:  Erica Ramos
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 5.159

5.  Implementation outcomes of Humanwide: integrated precision health in team-based family practice primary care.

Authors:  Cati G Brown-Johnson; Nadia Safaeinili; Juliana Baratta; Latha Palaniappan; Megan Mahoney; Lisa G Rosas; Marcy Winget
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2021-02-02       Impact factor: 2.497

6.  Early Outcome Data Assessing Utility of a Post-Test Genomic Counseling Framework for the Scalable Delivery of Precision Health.

Authors:  Amy C Sturm; Tara Schmidlen; Laura Scheinfeldt; Shelly Hovick; Joseph P McElroy; Amanda E Toland; J Scott Roberts; Kevin Sweet
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2018-07-25

7.  Research participants' experiences with return of genetic research results and preferences for web-based alternatives.

Authors:  Jill B Gaieski; Linda Patrick-Miller; Brian L Egleston; Kara N Maxwell; Sarah Walser; Laura DiGiovanni; Jamie Brower; Dominique Fetzer; Amanda Ganzak; Danielle McKenna; Jessica M Long; Jacquelyn Powers; Jill E Stopfer; Katherine L Nathanson; Susan M Domchek; Angela R Bradbury
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomic Med       Date:  2019-08-03       Impact factor: 2.183

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.