Literature DB >> 22113211

Subcortical representation of speech fine structure relates to reading ability.

Jane Hornickel1, Samira Anderson, Erika Skoe, Han-Gyol Yi, Nina Kraus.   

Abstract

Impaired perception of consonants by poor readers is reflected in poor subcortical encoding of speech timing and harmonics. We assessed auditory brainstem representation of higher harmonics within a consonant-vowel formant transition to identify relationships between speech fine structure and reading. Responses were analyzed in three ways: a single stimulus polarity, adding responses to inverted polarities (emphasizing low harmonics), and subtracting responses to inverted polarities (emphasizing high harmonics). Poor readers had a reduced representation of higher speech harmonics for subtracted polarities and a single polarity. No group differences were found for the fundamental frequency. These findings strengthen the evidence of subcortical encoding deficits in poor readers for speech fine structure and delineate effective strategies for capturing these neural impairments in humans.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22113211      PMCID: PMC3227738          DOI: 10.1097/WNR.0b013e32834d2ffd

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroreport        ISSN: 0959-4965            Impact factor:   1.837


  22 in total

1.  Effects of lengthened formant transition duration on discrimination and neural representation of synthetic CV syllables by normal and learning-disabled children.

Authors:  A R Bradlow; N Kraus; T G Nicol; T J McGee; J Cunningham; S G Zecker; T D Carrell
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Developmental aphasia: the perception of brief vowels and extended stop consonants.

Authors:  P Tallal; M Piercy
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1975-01       Impact factor: 3.139

3.  Allophonic mode of speech perception in dyslexia.

Authors:  Willy Serniclaes; Sandra Van Heghe; Philippe Mousty; René Carré; Liliane Sprenger-Charolles
Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol       Date:  2004-04

4.  Neurophysiological evidence for context-dependent encoding of sensory input in human auditory cortex.

Authors:  Elyse Sussman; Mitchell Steinschneider
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2006-02-03       Impact factor: 3.252

5.  A unitary model of pitch perception.

Authors:  R Meddis; L O'Mard
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Developmental aphasia: impaired rate of non-verbal processing as a function of sensory modality.

Authors:  P Tallal; M Piercy
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1973-10       Impact factor: 3.139

7.  Methods to eliminate stimulus transduction artifact from insert earphones during electroencephalography.

Authors:  Tom Campbell; Jess R Kerlin; Christopher W Bishop; Lee M Miller
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2012 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.570

8.  Electrophysiological and behavioral evidence of auditory processing deficits in children with reading disorder.

Authors:  M Sharma; S C Purdy; P Newall; K Wheldall; R Beaman; H Dillon
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2006-03-27       Impact factor: 3.708

9.  Neural temporal coding of low pitch. I. Human frequency-following responses to complex tones.

Authors:  S Greenberg; J T Marsh; W S Brown; J C Smith
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 3.208

10.  Sources of frequency following responses (FFR) in man.

Authors:  H Sohmer; H Pratt; R Kinarti
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1977-05
View more
  17 in total

1.  Why middle-aged listeners have trouble hearing in everyday settings.

Authors:  Dorea Ruggles; Hari Bharadwaj; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2012-06-21       Impact factor: 10.834

2.  A comparison of spectral magnitude and phase-locking value analyses of the frequency-following response to complex tones.

Authors:  Li Zhu; Hari Bharadwaj; Jing Xia; Barbara Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Construction of Hindi Speech Stimuli for Eliciting Auditory Brainstem Responses.

Authors:  Mohammad Shamim Ansari; R Rangasayee
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2016-07-08

4.  Speech-evoked auditory brainstem responses reflect familial and cognitive influences.

Authors:  Jane Hornickel; Deborah Lin; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2013-01

5.  Aging affects neural precision of speech encoding.

Authors:  Samira Anderson; Alexandra Parbery-Clark; Travis White-Schwoch; Nina Kraus
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-10-10       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Neural Processing of Speech Sounds in ASD and First-Degree Relatives.

Authors:  Shivani P Patel; Molly Winston; Janna Guilfoyle; Trent Nicol; Gary E Martin; Kritika Nayar; Nina Kraus; Molly Losh
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2022-06-07

7.  Unstable representation of sound: a biological marker of dyslexia.

Authors:  Jane Hornickel; Nina Kraus
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-02-20       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  The Potential Role of the cABR in Assessment and Management of Hearing Impairment.

Authors:  Samira Anderson; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Int J Otolaryngol       Date:  2013-01-30

9.  High gamma cortical processing of continuous speech in younger and older listeners.

Authors:  Joshua P Kulasingham; Christian Brodbeck; Alessandro Presacco; Stefanie E Kuchinsky; Samira Anderson; Jonathan Z Simon
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2020-08-21       Impact factor: 6.556

10.  Musical training heightens auditory brainstem function during sensitive periods in development.

Authors:  Erika Skoe; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-09-19
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.