Literature DB >> 23426677

Unstable representation of sound: a biological marker of dyslexia.

Jane Hornickel1, Nina Kraus.   

Abstract

Learning to read proceeds smoothly for most children, yet others struggle to translate verbal language into its written form. Poor readers often have a host of auditory, linguistic, and attention deficits, including abnormal neural representation of speech and inconsistent performance on psychoacoustic tasks. We hypothesize that this constellation of deficits associated with reading disorders arises from the human auditory system failing to respond to sound in a consistent manner, and that this inconsistency impinges upon the ability to relate phonology and orthography during reading. In support of this hypothesis, we show that poor readers have significantly more variable auditory brainstem responses to speech than do good readers, independent of resting neurophysiological noise levels. Thus, neural variability may be an underlying biological contributor to well established behavioral and neural deficits found in poor readers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23426677      PMCID: PMC3599785          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4205-12.2013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  40 in total

1.  Brainstem correlates of temporal auditory processing in children with specific language impairment.

Authors:  Madhavi Basu; Ananthanarayan Krishnan; Christine Weber-Fox
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2010-01-01

2.  Language-universal sensory deficits in developmental dyslexia: English, Spanish, and Chinese.

Authors:  Usha Goswami; H-L Sharon Wang; Alicia Cruz; Tim Fosker; Natasha Mead; Martina Huss
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2010-02-10       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Psychophysical evidence for a general temporal processing deficit in children with dyslexia.

Authors:  M Van Ingelghem; A van Wieringen; J Wouters; E Vandenbussche; P Onghena; P Ghesquière
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2001-11-16       Impact factor: 1.837

4.  Neural timing is linked to speech perception in noise.

Authors:  Samira Anderson; Erika Skoe; Bharath Chandrasekaran; Nina Kraus
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-04-07       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Music, rhythm, rise time perception and developmental dyslexia: perception of musical meter predicts reading and phonology.

Authors:  Martina Huss; John P Verney; Tim Fosker; Natasha Mead; Usha Goswami
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2010-08-05       Impact factor: 4.027

6.  Auditory brainstem measures predict reading and speech-in-noise perception in school-aged children.

Authors:  Jane Hornickel; Bharath Chandrasekaran; Steve Zecker; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2010-09-06       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Nature of auditory processing disorder in children.

Authors:  David R Moore; Melanie A Ferguson; A Mark Edmondson-Jones; Sonia Ratib; Alison Riley
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2010-07-26       Impact factor: 7.124

8.  Speech-perception-in-noise deficits in dyslexia.

Authors:  Johannes C Ziegler; Catherine Pech-Georgel; Florence George; Christian Lorenzi
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2009-09

9.  Auditory neurophysiologic responses and discrimination deficits in children with learning problems.

Authors:  N Kraus; T J McGee; T D Carrell; S G Zecker; T G Nicol; D B Koch
Journal:  Science       Date:  1996-08-16       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Discrimination of speech sounds by children with dyslexia: comparisons with chronological age and reading level controls.

Authors:  C Bogliotti; W Serniclaes; S Messaoud-Galusi; L Sprenger-Charolles
Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol       Date:  2008-05-06
View more
  94 in total

1.  The neural encoding of formant frequencies contributing to vowel identification in normal-hearing listeners.

Authors:  Jong Ho Won; Kelly Tremblay; Christopher G Clinard; Richard A Wright; Elad Sagi; Mario Svirsky
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 2.  Neural Noise Hypothesis of Developmental Dyslexia.

Authors:  Roeland Hancock; Kenneth R Pugh; Fumiko Hoeft
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2017-04-08       Impact factor: 20.229

3.  Neural stability: A reflection of automaticity in reading.

Authors:  Silvia Siu-Yin Lam; Travis White-Schwoch; Steven G Zecker; Jane Hornickel; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2017-07-21       Impact factor: 3.139

4.  Music training alters the course of adolescent auditory development.

Authors:  Adam T Tierney; Jennifer Krizman; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-07-20       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Beat synchronization predicts neural speech encoding and reading readiness in preschoolers.

Authors:  Kali Woodruff Carr; Travis White-Schwoch; Adam T Tierney; Dana L Strait; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-09-22       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Environmental acoustic enrichment promotes recovery from developmentally degraded auditory cortical processing.

Authors:  Xiaoqing Zhu; Fang Wang; Huifang Hu; Xinde Sun; Michael P Kilgard; Michael M Merzenich; Xiaoming Zhou
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-04-16       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Neurobiological Bases of Reading Disorder Part II: The Importance of Developmental Considerations in Typical and Atypical Reading.

Authors:  Jessica M Black; Zhichao Xia; Fumiko Hoeft
Journal:  Lang Linguist Compass       Date:  2017-09-26

8.  Detection and identification of speech sounds using cortical activity patterns.

Authors:  T M Centanni; A M Sloan; A C Reed; C T Engineer; R L Rennaker; M P Kilgard
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2013-11-26       Impact factor: 3.590

9.  The ability to move to a beat is linked to the consistency of neural responses to sound.

Authors:  Adam Tierney; Nina Kraus
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-09-18       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Stable auditory processing underlies phonological awareness in typically developing preschoolers.

Authors:  Silvia Bonacina; Sebastian Otto-Meyer; Jennifer Krizman; Travis White-Schwoch; Trent Nicol; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2019-07-30       Impact factor: 2.381

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.