Literature DB >> 67025

Sources of frequency following responses (FFR) in man.

H Sohmer, H Pratt, R Kinarti.   

Abstract

In order to study the sources and pathways which are responsible for the frequency following response (FFR), records were made in control subjects and in patients with special types of lesion and response. It has already been shown that the FFR in normal subjects to tone bursts with single onset phases is made up of a short latency cochlear microphonic potential (CM) and a longer latency neural component (neural FFR). No neural FFR could be recorded in patients with upper brain-stem lesions (absence of click-evoked responses from the inferior colliculus along with clinical signs of such a lesion). Their FFR was exclusively a cochlear microphonic potential, thus demonstrating that the neural FFR with a latency of 6 msec is generated in the region of the inferior colliculus. Also in subjects with large post-auricular muscle (PAM) responses, the PAM can contribute to the FFR, with a latency of 10 msec. In patients with high-tone hearing loss due to acoustic trauma, no CM could be recorded while a neural FFR with a latency of 6 msec was present. This indicates that the CM recorded by this technique may be generated in the basal turn. It also demonstrates that the pathway of the neural FFR begins in the apical turn of the cochlea.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1977        PMID: 67025     DOI: 10.1016/0013-4694(77)90282-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0013-4694


  38 in total

1.  Musicians and tone-language speakers share enhanced brainstem encoding but not perceptual benefits for musical pitch.

Authors:  Gavin M Bidelman; Jackson T Gandour; Ananthanarayan Krishnan
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2011-08-10       Impact factor: 2.310

2.  Auditory midbrain representation of a break in interaural correlation.

Authors:  Qian Wang; Liang Li
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-08-12       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Novelty detection in the human auditory brainstem.

Authors:  Lavinia Slabu; Sabine Grimm; Carles Escera
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-01-25       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Seasonal variation in avian auditory evoked responses to tones: a comparative analysis of Carolina chickadees, tufted titmice, and white-breasted nuthatches.

Authors:  Jeffrey R Lucas; Todd M Freeberg; Glenis R Long; Ananthanarayan Krishnan
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2006-10-26       Impact factor: 1.836

5.  A comparison of spectral magnitude and phase-locking value analyses of the frequency-following response to complex tones.

Authors:  Li Zhu; Hari Bharadwaj; Jing Xia; Barbara Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Frequency-following response among neonates with progressive moderate hyperbilirubinemia.

Authors:  Gabriella Musacchia; Jiong Hu; Vinod K Bhutani; Ronald J Wong; Mei-Ling Tong; Shuping Han; Nikolas H Blevins; Matthew B Fitzgerald
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2019-07-01       Impact factor: 2.521

7.  Inherent auditory skills rather than formal music training shape the neural encoding of speech.

Authors:  Kelsey Mankel; Gavin M Bidelman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-12-03       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Hidden Markov modeling of frequency-following responses to Mandarin lexical tones.

Authors:  Fernando Llanos; Zilong Xie; Bharath Chandrasekaran
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2017-08-12       Impact factor: 2.390

9.  Rapid acquisition of auditory subcortical steady state responses using multichannel recordings.

Authors:  Hari M Bharadwaj; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2014-01-29       Impact factor: 3.708

10.  Aging alters the perception and physiological representation of frequency: evidence from human frequency-following response recordings.

Authors:  Christopher G Clinard; Kelly L Tremblay; Ananthanarayan R Krishnan
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2009-11-26       Impact factor: 3.208

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.