Literature DB >> 32835821

High gamma cortical processing of continuous speech in younger and older listeners.

Joshua P Kulasingham1, Christian Brodbeck2, Alessandro Presacco3, Stefanie E Kuchinsky4, Samira Anderson5, Jonathan Z Simon6.   

Abstract

Neural processing along the ascending auditory pathway is often associated with a progressive reduction in characteristic processing rates. For instance, the well-known frequency-following response (FFR) of the auditory midbrain, as measured with electroencephalography (EEG), is dominated by frequencies from ∼100 Hz to several hundred Hz, phase-locking to the acoustic stimulus at those frequencies. In contrast, cortical responses, whether measured by EEG or magnetoencephalography (MEG), are typically characterized by frequencies of a few Hz to a few tens of Hz, time-locking to acoustic envelope features. In this study we investigated a crossover case, cortically generated responses time-locked to continuous speech features at FFR-like rates. Using MEG, we analyzed responses in the high gamma range of 70-200 Hz to continuous speech using neural source-localized reverse correlation and the corresponding temporal response functions (TRFs). Continuous speech stimuli were presented to 40 subjects (17 younger, 23 older adults) with clinically normal hearing and their MEG responses were analyzed in the 70-200 Hz band. Consistent with the relative insensitivity of MEG to many subcortical structures, the spatiotemporal profile of these response components indicated a cortical origin with ∼40 ms peak latency and a right hemisphere bias. TRF analysis was performed using two separate aspects of the speech stimuli: a) the 70-200 Hz carrier of the speech, and b) the 70-200 Hz temporal modulations in the spectral envelope of the speech stimulus. The response was dominantly driven by the envelope modulation, with a much weaker contribution from the carrier. Age-related differences were also analyzed to investigate a reversal previously seen along the ascending auditory pathway, whereby older listeners show weaker midbrain FFR responses than younger listeners, but, paradoxically, have stronger cortical low frequency responses. In contrast to both these earlier results, this study did not find clear age-related differences in high gamma cortical responses to continuous speech. Cortical responses at FFR-like frequencies shared some properties with midbrain responses at the same frequencies and with cortical responses at much lower frequencies.
Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aging, speech encoding; Auditory spectrogram; Spectrotemporal; Volume source localization

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32835821      PMCID: PMC7736126          DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.117291

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  83 in total

1.  Rapid Transformation from Auditory to Linguistic Representations of Continuous Speech.

Authors:  Christian Brodbeck; L Elliot Hong; Jonathan Z Simon
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2018-11-29       Impact factor: 10.834

2.  Right hemispheric laterality of human 40 Hz auditory steady-state responses.

Authors:  B Ross; A T Herdman; C Pantev
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2005-03-16       Impact factor: 5.357

3.  Age-related differences in identification and discrimination of temporal cues in speech segments.

Authors:  Sandra Gordon-Salant; Grace H Yeni-Komshian; Peter J Fitzgibbons; Jessica Barrett
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Multichannel recordings of the human brainstem frequency-following response: scalp topography, source generators, and distinctions from the transient ABR.

Authors:  Gavin M Bidelman
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2015-02-07       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  Musicians at the Cocktail Party: Neural Substrates of Musical Training During Selective Listening in Multispeaker Situations.

Authors:  Sebastian Puschmann; Sylvain Baillet; Robert J Zatorre
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2019-07-22       Impact factor: 5.357

6.  Evidence of degraded representation of speech in noise, in the aging midbrain and cortex.

Authors:  Alessandro Presacco; Jonathan Z Simon; Samira Anderson
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-08-17       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Mutual information analysis of neural representations of speech in noise in the aging midbrain.

Authors:  Peng Zan; Alessandro Presacco; Samira Anderson; Jonathan Z Simon
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2019-10-09       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Simultaneous EEG and MEG recordings reveal vocal pitch elicited cortical gamma oscillations in young and older adults.

Authors:  Bernhard Ross; Kelly L Tremblay; Claude Alain
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2019-10-07       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  The phase of thalamic alpha activity modulates cortical gamma-band activity: evidence from resting-state MEG recordings.

Authors:  Frédéric Roux; Michael Wibral; Wolf Singer; Jaan Aru; Peter J Uhlhaas
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-11-06       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Functional organization of human auditory cortex: investigation of response latencies through direct recordings.

Authors:  Kirill V Nourski; Mitchell Steinschneider; Bob McMurray; Christopher K Kovach; Hiroyuki Oya; Hiroto Kawasaki; Matthew A Howard
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2014-07-12       Impact factor: 6.556

View more
  4 in total

1.  Subcortical rather than cortical sources of the frequency-following response (FFR) relate to speech-in-noise perception in normal-hearing listeners.

Authors:  Gavin M Bidelman; Sara Momtaz
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2021-01-23       Impact factor: 3.046

2.  Neural Measures of Pitch Processing in EEG Responses to Running Speech.

Authors:  Florine L Bachmann; Ewen N MacDonald; Jens Hjortkjær
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2021-12-21       Impact factor: 4.677

3.  The neural response at the fundamental frequency of speech is modulated by word-level acoustic and linguistic information.

Authors:  Mikolaj Kegler; Hugo Weissbart; Tobias Reichenbach
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2022-07-22       Impact factor: 5.152

4.  Cortical tracking of voice pitch in the presence of multiple speakers depends on selective attention.

Authors:  Christian Brodbeck; Jonathan Z Simon
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2022-08-08       Impact factor: 5.152

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.