Literature DB >> 33717312

Can dynamic consent facilitate the protection of biomedical big data in biobanking in Malaysia?

Mohammad Firdaus Abdul Aziz1, Aimi Nadia Mohd Yusof2.   

Abstract

As with many other countries, Malaysia is also developing and promoting biomedical research to increase the understanding of human diseases and possible interventions. To facilitate this development, there is a significant growth of biobanks in the country to ensure continuous collection of biological samples for future research, which contain extremely important personal information and health data of the participants involved. Given the vast amount of samples and data accumulated by biobanks, they can be considered as reservoirs of precious biomedical big data. It is therefore imperative for biobanks to have in place regulatory measures to ensure ethical use of the biomedical big data. Malaysia has yet to introduce specific legislation for the field of biobanking. However, it can be argued that its existing Personal Data Protection Act 2010 (PDPA) has laid down legal principles that can be enforced to protect biomedical big data generated by the biobanks. Consent is a mechanism to enable data subjects to exercise their autonomy by determining how their data can be used and ensure compliance with legal principles. However, there are two main concerns surrounding the current practice of consent in biomedical big data in Malaysia. First, it is uncertain that the current practice would be able to respect the underlying notion of autonomy, and second, it is not in accordance with the legal principles of the PDPA. Scholars have deliberated on different strategies of informed consent, and a more interactive approach has recently been introduced: dynamic consent. It is argued that a dynamic consent approach would be able to address these concerns. © National University of Singapore and Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Autonomy; Biobanking; Data protection; Dynamic consent; Informed consent

Year:  2019        PMID: 33717312      PMCID: PMC7747242          DOI: 10.1007/s41649-019-00086-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Asian Bioeth Rev        ISSN: 1793-9453


  22 in total

Review 1.  Human genetic research, DNA banking and consent: a question of 'form'?

Authors:  M Deschênes; G Cardinal; B M Knoppers; K C Glass
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 4.438

2.  Clinical research. Company plans to bank human DNA profiles.

Authors:  E Marshall
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-01-26       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 3.  From patients to partners: participant-centric initiatives in biomedical research.

Authors:  Jane Kaye; Liam Curren; Nick Anderson; Kelly Edwards; Stephanie M Fullerton; Nadja Kanellopoulou; David Lund; Daniel G MacArthur; Deborah Mascalzoni; James Shepherd; Patrick L Taylor; Sharon F Terry; Stefan F Winter
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2012-04-03       Impact factor: 53.242

4.  Bridging consent: from toll bridges to lift bridges?

Authors:  Isabelle Budin-Ljøsne; Anne Marie Tassé; Bartha Maria Knoppers; Jennifer R Harris
Journal:  BMC Med Genomics       Date:  2011-10-04       Impact factor: 3.063

5.  GOVERNING GENETIC DATABASES: COLLECTION, STORAGE AND USE.

Authors:  Susan M C Gibbons; Jane Kaye
Journal:  Kings Law J       Date:  2007

Review 6.  Biobanking past, present and future: responsibilities and benefits.

Authors:  Yvonne G De Souza; John S Greenspan
Journal:  AIDS       Date:  2013-01-28       Impact factor: 4.177

7.  Broad consent versus dynamic consent in biobank research: is passive participation an ethical problem?

Authors:  Kristin Solum Steinsbekk; Bjørn Kåre Myskja; Berge Solberg
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2013-01-09       Impact factor: 4.246

8.  Dynamic consent: a possible solution to improve patient confidence and trust in how electronic patient records are used in medical research.

Authors:  Hawys Williams; Karen Spencer; Caroline Sanders; David Lund; Edgar A Whitley; Jane Kaye; William G Dixon
Journal:  JMIR Med Inform       Date:  2015-01-13

9.  Equitable Participation in Biobanks: The Risks and Benefits of a "Dynamic Consent" Approach.

Authors:  Megan Prictor; Harriet J A Teare; Jane Kaye
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2018-09-05

10.  Cohort Profile: The Malaysian Cohort (TMC) project: a prospective study of non-communicable diseases in a multi-ethnic population.

Authors:  Rahman Jamal; Syed Zulkifli Syed Zakaria; Mohd Arman Kamaruddin; Nazihah Abd Jalal; Norliza Ismail; Norkhamiwati Mohd Kamil; Noraidatulakma Abdullah; Norhafizah Baharudin; Noor Hamidah Hussin; Hanita Othman; Nor Muhammad Mahadi
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2014-04-11       Impact factor: 7.196

View more
  1 in total

1.  Current Status and Future Challenges of Biobank Research in Malaysia.

Authors:  Latifah Amin; Angelina Olesen; Zurina Mahadi; Maznah Ibrahim
Journal:  Asian Bioeth Rev       Date:  2021-03-31
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.