Literature DB >> 19659851

Reconsidering the value of consent in biobank research.

Judy Allen1, Beverley McNamara.   

Abstract

Biobanks for long-term research pose challenges to the legal and ethical validity of consent to participate. Different models of consent have been proposed to answer some of these challenges. This paper contributes to this discussion by considering the meaning and value of consent to participants in biobanks. Empirical data from a qualitative study is used to provide a participant view of the consent process and to demonstrate that, despite limited understanding of the research, consent provides the research participants with some level of control and a form of self determination that they value. Participation is framed as a moral act of a responsible citizen providing reinforcement of self identity. Consent symbolizes the trust invested in researchers and research institutions to use the biobank for the public good. The paper argues that consent continues to play an important role in biobank participation and that a participant view should inform proposals to modify consent processes.
© 2009 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 19659851     DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8519.2009.01749.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioethics        ISSN: 0269-9702            Impact factor:   1.898


  24 in total

1.  Can Broad Consent be Informed Consent?

Authors:  Mark Sheehan
Journal:  Public Health Ethics       Date:  2011-08-03       Impact factor: 1.940

2.  Big Data in medical research and EU data protection law: challenges to the consent or anonymise approach.

Authors:  Menno Mostert; Annelien L Bredenoord; Monique C I H Biesaart; Johannes J M van Delden
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2015-11-11       Impact factor: 4.246

3.  Public perspectives on biospecimen procurement: what biorepositories should consider.

Authors:  Jamie L'Heureux; Jeffrey C Murray; Elizabeth Newbury; Laura Shinkunas; Christian M Simon
Journal:  Biopreserv Biobank       Date:  2013-05-29       Impact factor: 2.300

Review 4.  Biobanking residual tissues.

Authors:  Peter H J Riegman; Evert-Ben van Veen
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2011-08-04       Impact factor: 4.132

Review 5.  The Bio-PIN: a concept to improve biobanking.

Authors:  J J Nietfeld; Jeremy Sugarman; Jan-Eric Litton
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2011-03-17       Impact factor: 60.716

6.  The ethics of biobanking: key issues and controversies.

Authors:  Heather Widdows; Sean Cordell
Journal:  Health Care Anal       Date:  2011-09

Review 7.  Ethical and deontological issues in Transfusion Medicine.

Authors:  Dario Sacchini; Giancarlo Maria Liumbruno; Gennaro Bruno; Chiara Liumbruno; Daniela Rafanelli; Roberta Minacori; Pietro Refolo; Antonio G Spagnolo
Journal:  Blood Transfus       Date:  2012-09-19       Impact factor: 3.443

8.  Withdrawal from biobank research: considerations and the way forward.

Authors:  Kristina Hug; Göran Hermerén; Mats Johansson
Journal:  Stem Cell Rev Rep       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 5.739

9.  Instrumentalist analyses of the functions of ethics concept-principles: a proposal for synergetic empirical and conceptual enrichment.

Authors:  Eric Racine; M Ariel Cascio; Marjorie Montreuil; Aline Bogossian
Journal:  Theor Med Bioeth       Date:  2019-08

10.  An Assessment of a Shortened Consent Form for the Storage and Research Use of Residual Newborn Screening Blood Spots.

Authors:  Erin Rothwell; Aaron Goldenberg; Erin Johnson; Naomi Riches; Beth Tarini; Jeffrey R Botkin
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2017-10-26       Impact factor: 1.742

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.