Literature DB >> 20835405

Recognition memory reveals just how CONTRASTIVE contrastive accenting really is.

Scott H Fraundorf1, Duane G Watson, Aaron S Benjamin.   

Abstract

The effects of pitch accenting on memory were investigated in three experiments. Participants listened to short recorded discourses that contained contrast sets with two items (e.g. British scientists and French scientists); a continuation specified one item from the set. Pitch accenting on the critical word in the continuation was manipulated between non-contrastive (H* in the ToBI system) and contrastive (L+H*). On subsequent recognition memory tests, the L+H* accent increased hits to correct statements and correct rejections of the contrast item (Experiments 1-3), but did not impair memory for other parts of the discourse (Experiment 2). L+H* also did not facilitate correct rejections of lures not in the contrast set (Experiment 3), indicating that contrastive accents do not simply strengthen the representation of the target item. These results suggest comprehenders use pitch accenting to encode and update information about multiple elements in a contrast set.

Entities:  

Year:  2010        PMID: 20835405      PMCID: PMC2935187          DOI: 10.1016/j.jml.2010.06.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mem Lang        ISSN: 0749-596X            Impact factor:   3.059


  19 in total

1.  Depth of processing in language comprehension: not noticing the evidence.

Authors:  Anthony Sanford; Patrick Sturt
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2002-09-01       Impact factor: 20.229

2.  Finding referents in time: eye-tracking evidence for the role of contrastive accents.

Authors:  Andrea Weber; Bettina Braun; Matthew W Crocker
Journal:  Lang Speech       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 1.500

3.  Functions for traditional and multilevel approaches to signal detection theory.

Authors:  Daniel B Wright; Ruth Horry; Elin M Skagerberg
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2009-05

4.  The Psychophysics Toolbox.

Authors:  D H Brainard
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  1997

5.  The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies.

Authors:  D G Pelli
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  1997

6.  Partial matching in the Moses illusion: response bias not sensitivity.

Authors:  E N Kamas; L M Reder; M S Ayers
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1996-11

7.  Semantic focus and sentence comprehension.

Authors:  A Cutler; J A Fodor
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1979-03

8.  Integration of visual and linguistic information in spoken language comprehension.

Authors:  M K Tanenhaus; M J Spivey-Knowlton; K M Eberhard; J C Sedivy
Journal:  Science       Date:  1995-06-16       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Change blindness.

Authors:  D J Simons; D T Levin
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 20.229

10.  Experimental and theoretical advances in prosody: A review.

Authors:  Michael Wagner; Duane G Watson
Journal:  Lang Cogn Process       Date:  2010-01-01
View more
  19 in total

1.  The effects of age on the strategic use of pitch accents in memory for discourse: a processing-resource account.

Authors:  Scott H Fraundorf; Duane G Watson; Aaron S Benjamin
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2011-05-30

2.  Effects of pitch accents in attachment ambiguity resolution.

Authors:  Eun-Kyung Lee; Duane G Watson
Journal:  Lang Cogn Process       Date:  2011

3.  Listeners consider alternative speaker productions in discourse comprehension and memory: Evidence from beat gesture and pitch accenting.

Authors:  Laura M Morett; Scott H Fraundorf
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2019-11

4.  Individual differences in syntactic processing: Is there evidence for reader-text interactions?

Authors:  Ariel N James; Scott H Fraundorf; Eun-Kyung Lee; Duane G Watson
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2018-06-27       Impact factor: 3.059

5.  What happened (and what didn't): Discourse constraints on encoding of plausible alternatives.

Authors:  Scott H Fraundorf; Aaron S Benjamin; Duane G Watson
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2013-10-01       Impact factor: 3.059

6.  The influences of valence and arousal on judgments of learning and on recall.

Authors:  Kathleen L Hourihan; Scott H Fraundorf; Aaron S Benjamin
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2017-01

7.  Effects of contrastive accents on children's discourse comprehension.

Authors:  Eun-Kyung Lee; Jesse Snedeker
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-10

8.  Prediction in the Processing of Repair Disfluencies.

Authors:  Matthew W Lowder; Fernanda Ferreira
Journal:  Lang Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2015-04-21       Impact factor: 2.331

9.  Reduction in Prosodic Prominence Predicts Speakers' Recall: Implications for Theories of Prosody.

Authors:  Scott H Fraundorf; Duane G Watson; Aaron S Benjamin
Journal:  Lang Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2014-09-24       Impact factor: 2.331

10.  Hungarian Structural Focus: Accessibility to Focused Elements and Their Alternatives in Working Memory and Delayed Recognition Memory.

Authors:  Tamás Káldi; Ágnes Szöllösi; Anna Babarczy
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-04-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.