Literature DB >> 22096265

Accent detection is a slippery slope: Direction and rate of F0 change drives listeners' comprehension.

Angela M Isaacs1, Duane G Watson.   

Abstract

The present study tests whether listeners use F0, duration, or some combination of the two to identify the presence of an accented word in a short discourse. Participants' eye movements to previously mentioned and new objects were monitored as participants listened to instructions to move objects in a display. The name of the target object on critical trials was resynthesized from naturally-produced utterances so that it had either high or low F0 and either long or short duration. Fixations to the new object were highest when there was a steep rise in F0. Fixations to the previously mentioned object were highest when there was a steep drop in F0. These results suggest that listeners use F0 slope to make decisions about the presence of an accent, and that F0 and duration by themselves do not solely determine accent interpretation.

Entities:  

Year:  2010        PMID: 22096265      PMCID: PMC3216043          DOI: 10.1080/01690961003783699

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lang Cogn Process        ISSN: 0169-0965


  13 in total

1.  Constant "segmental anchoring" of F0 movements under changes in speech rate.

Authors:  D R Ladd; D Faulkner; H Faulkner; A Schepman
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Loudness predicts prominence: fundamental frequency lends little.

Authors:  G Kochanski; E Grabe; J Coleman; B Rosner
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Finding referents in time: eye-tracking evidence for the role of contrastive accents.

Authors:  Andrea Weber; Bettina Braun; Matthew W Crocker
Journal:  Lang Speech       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 1.500

4.  Connecting intonation labels to mathematical descriptions of fundamental frequency.

Authors:  Esther Grabe; Greg Kochanski; John Coleman
Journal:  Lang Speech       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 1.500

5.  Tic Tac Toe: effects of predictability and importance on acoustic prominence in language production.

Authors:  Duane G Watson; Jennifer E Arnold; Michael K Tanenhaus
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2007-08-13

6.  Functional parallelism in spoken word-recognition.

Authors:  W D Marslen-Wilson
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1987-03

7.  Integration of visual and linguistic information in spoken language comprehension.

Authors:  M K Tanenhaus; M J Spivey-Knowlton; K M Eberhard; J C Sedivy
Journal:  Science       Date:  1995-06-16       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 8.  Eye movements as a window into real-time spoken language comprehension in natural contexts.

Authors:  K M Eberhard; M J Spivey-Knowlton; J C Sedivy; M K Tanenhaus
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  1995-11

9.  A standardized set of 260 pictures: norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity.

Authors:  J G Snodgrass; M Vanderwart
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Learn       Date:  1980-03

10.  THE BACON not the bacon: how children and adults understand accented and unaccented noun phrases.

Authors:  Jennifer E Arnold
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2008-03-20
View more
  6 in total

1.  Effects of distributional information on categorization of prosodic contours.

Authors:  Chigusa Kurumada; Meredith Brown; Michael K Tanenhaus
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-06

2.  Repetition is easy: why repeated referents have reduced prominence.

Authors:  Tuan Q Lam; Duane G Watson
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2010-12

3.  Using prosody to infer discourse prominence in cochlear-implant users and normal-hearing listeners.

Authors:  Yi Ting Huang; Rochelle S Newman; Allison Catalano; Matthew J Goupell
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2017-06-01

4.  Experimental and theoretical advances in prosody: A review.

Authors:  Michael Wagner; Duane G Watson
Journal:  Lang Cogn Process       Date:  2010-01-01

Review 5.  Voice Stress Analysis: A New Framework for Voice and Effort in Human Performance.

Authors:  Martine Van Puyvelde; Xavier Neyt; Francis McGlone; Nathalie Pattyn
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-11-20

6.  Correction by Focus: Cleft Constructions and the Cross-Linguistic Variation in Phonological Form.

Authors:  Markus Greif; Stavros Skopeteas
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-11-29
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.