Literature DB >> 8667300

Prosodic form and parsing commitments.

S M Watt1, W S Murray.   

Abstract

This paper examines the question of whether there are effects of prosody on the syntactic parsing of temporarily ambiguous sentences containing complement verbs. It reports the results of five experiments employing cross-modal response tasks where the visually presented target word was either an ¿appropriate' or an ¿inappropriate' continuation in terms of the prosodic form of the preceeding auditory sentence fragment. Two experiments employing cross-modal naming only showed indications of sensitivity to syntactic and appropriateness manipulations when coupled with a simultaneous appropriateness judgment task. In contrast, the experiments employing cross-modal lexical decision showed greater sensitivity to syntactic and appropriateness effects. However, while the results from these studies replicated our earlier auditory parsing results and provided support for the suggestion that there are differences in visual and auditory parsing processes and for a ¿constituent-based, ' ¿minimal commitment' type auditory parser, none of the studies demonstrated an effect of prosodic form on the parsing process.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8667300     DOI: 10.1007/bf01708575

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res        ISSN: 0090-6905


  7 in total

1.  Use of verb information in syntactic parsing: evidence from eye movements and word-by-word self-paced reading.

Authors:  F Ferreira; J M Henderson
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 3.051

2.  Prosodic influences on the resolution of temporary ambiguity during on-line sentence processing.

Authors:  H N Nagel; L P Shapiro; B Tuller; R Nawy
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  1996-03

3.  Spatial coding in the processing of anaphor by good and poor readers: evidence from eye movement analyses.

Authors:  W S Murray; A Kennedy
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  1988-11

4.  Verb-specific constraints in sentence processing: separating effects of lexical preference from garden-paths.

Authors:  J C Trueswell; M K Tanenhaus; C Kello
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 3.051

Review 5.  Processing syntactically ambiguous sentences: evidence from semantic priming.

Authors:  J L Nicol; M J Pickering
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  1993-03

6.  Lexical decision in sentences: effects of syntactic structure.

Authors:  B Wright; M Garrett
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1984-01

7.  Are lexical decisions a good measure of lexical access? The role of word frequency in the neglected decision stage.

Authors:  D A Balota; J I Chumbley
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1984-06       Impact factor: 3.332

  7 in total
  9 in total

1.  Intonational disambiguation in sentence production and comprehension.

Authors:  A J Schafer; S R Speer; P Warren; S D White
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2000-03

2.  Syntactic, prosodic, and semantic processes in the brain: evidence from event-related neuroimaging.

Authors:  A D Friederici
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2001-05

3.  Prosodic boundaries, comma rules, and brain responses: the closure positive shift in ERPs as a universal marker for prosodic phrasing in listeners and readers.

Authors:  K Steinhauer; A D Friederici
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2001-05

4.  The extraction of structure during reading: evidence from reading prosody.

Authors:  Asher Koriat; Seth N Greenberg; Hamutal Kreiner
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2002-03

5.  What can prosody tell a parser?

Authors:  J L Nicol
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  1996-03

6.  Effects and limitations of prosodic and semantic biases on syntactic disambiguation.

Authors:  Y Misono; R Mazuka; T Kondo; S Kiritani
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  1997-03

7.  Experimental and theoretical advances in prosody: A review.

Authors:  Michael Wagner; Duane G Watson
Journal:  Lang Cogn Process       Date:  2010-01-01

8.  Speech rhythm facilitates syntactic ambiguity resolution: ERP evidence.

Authors:  Maria Paula Roncaglia-Denissen; Maren Schmidt-Kassow; Sonja A Kotz
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-02-08       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Neurophysiological Correlates of Musical and Prosodic Phrasing: Shared Processing Mechanisms and Effects of Musical Expertise.

Authors:  Anastasia Glushko; Karsten Steinhauer; John DePriest; Stefan Koelsch
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-05-18       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.