Literature DB >> 22096220

More harm than good? The anatomy of misguided shielding of the ovaries.

S L Fawcett1, A C Gomez, S J Barter, M Ditchfield, P Set.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Popular gonad shield designs aim to provide coverage of the true pelvis, which is presumed to be the probable location of the ovaries. Shields are frequently placed inaccurately, especially in children, obscuring important orthopaedic landmarks on pelvic radiographs. We aimed to identify the position of the ovaries and asses how this may vary with age and the degree of bladder filling. We aimed to identify the position of the ovaries and asses how this may vary with age and the degree of bladder filling.
METHODS: Using MRI examinations of the pelvis in women and children, we located 594 ovaries in 306 female patients aged from birth to 59 years.
RESULTS: This study provides new evidence that bladder filling affects ovary position. A lower than expected number of patients had both ovaries within the pelvis if the bladder contained more than a moderate volume of urine. Bladder emptying should be achieved wherever practical if a shield is used. In children under the age of 7 years, more than half (19/37) had at least one ovary outside the true pelvis. There was a significant association between age and ovary position, with the percentage of patients with one or both ovaries outside the true pelvis decreasing with age (χ(2), p<0.0001).
CONCLUSION: The embryological descent of the ovaries into the pelvis would appear to continue after birth, well into childhood. Current popular shield designs are therefore inappropriate for use in young children. Given the high risk of obscuring critical landmarks, coupled with the new evidence that even accurate placement will not necessarily protect the ovaries, the use of pelvic shields in girls should be reconsidered.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22096220      PMCID: PMC3587098          DOI: 10.1259/bjr/25742247

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Radiol        ISSN: 0007-1285            Impact factor:   3.039


  24 in total

1.  Study on the use of gonadal protection shields during paediatric pelvic X-rays.

Authors:  Manoj Sikand; S Stinchcombe; P J Livesley
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 1.891

2.  [Problems in ovarian protection in roentgenography of the pelvis].

Authors:  K FOCHEM; R PAPE
Journal:  Fortschr Geb Rontgenstr Nuklearmed       Date:  1962-12

Review 3.  Embryology of the spine and associated congenital abnormalities.

Authors:  Kevin M Kaplan; Jeffrey M Spivak; John A Bendo
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2005 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.166

4.  The Physiological Descent of the Ovaries in the Human Foetus.

Authors:  D B Hart
Journal:  J Anat Physiol       Date:  1909-10

5.  Radiation dose reduction to the male gonads during MDCT: the effectiveness of a lead shield.

Authors:  Christian Hohl; Andreas H Mahnken; Ernst Klotz; Marco Das; Achim Stargardt; Georg Mühlenbruch; Thorsten Schmidt; Rolf W Günther; Joachim E Wildberger
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 3.959

6.  Radiation therapy in the management of children with gynecologic cancers.

Authors:  G J D'Angio; M Tefft
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  1967-05-10       Impact factor: 5.691

7.  Paediatric pelvic imaging: improvement in gonad shield placement by multidisciplinary audit.

Authors:  M McCarty; R Waugh; H McCallum; R J Montgomery; O M Aszkenasy
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2001-09

8.  Undescended ovary and unicornuate uterus: simplified diagnosis by the use of clomiphene citrate ovarian stimulation and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

Authors:  W Ombelet; M Grieten; Ph DeNeubourg; G Verswijvel; L Buekenhout; P Hinoul; E deJonge
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 6.918

9.  The ALARA (as low as reasonably achievable) concept in pediatric interventional and fluoroscopic imaging: striving to keep radiation doses as low as possible during fluoroscopy of pediatric patients--a white paper executive summary.

Authors:  Keith J Strauss; Sue C Kaste
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2006-09

10.  Location of the ovaries in girls from newborn to 18 years of age: reconsidering ovarian shielding.

Authors:  Dianna M E Bardo; Michelle Black; Kellie Schenk; Mario F Zaritzky
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2009-01-08
View more
  10 in total

Review 1.  Combating radiation therapy-induced damage to the ovarian environment.

Authors:  Francesca E Duncan; Bruce F Kimler; Shawn M Briley
Journal:  Future Oncol       Date:  2016-04-27       Impact factor: 3.404

2.  Size of testes, ovaries, uterus and breast buds by ultrasound in healthy full-term neonates ages 0-3 days.

Authors:  Summer L Kaplan; J Christopher Edgar; Eileen G Ford; Margaret A Adgent; Joan I Schall; Andrea Kelly; David M Umbach; Walter J Rogan; Virginia A Stallings; Kassa Darge
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2016-08-31

3.  Female gonadal shielding with automatic exposure control increases radiation risks.

Authors:  Summer L Kaplan; Dennise Magill; Marc A Felice; Rui Xiao; Sayed Ali; Xiaowei Zhu
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2017-10-18

4.  Preserving Fertility in Adolescent Girls and Young Women Requiring Craniospinal Irradiation: A Case Report and Discussion of Options to Be Considered Prior to Treatment.

Authors:  Nataniel H Lester-Coll; Christopher B Morse; Huifang A Zhai; Stefan Both; Jill P Ginsberg; Clarisa R Gracia; Robert A Lustig; Zelig Tochner; Christine E Hill-Kayser
Journal:  J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol       Date:  2014-06-01       Impact factor: 2.223

5.  Relative distribution of pertinent findings on portable neonatal abdominal radiographs: can we shield the gonads?

Authors:  Matthew Winfeld; Naomi Strubel; Lynne Pinkney; Shailee Lala; Sarah Milla; James Babb; Nancy Fefferman
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2013-05-02

6.  Gonad shielding in pelvic radiography: modern optimised X-ray systems might allow its discontinuation.

Authors:  Cécile R L P N Jeukens; Gerhard Kütterer; Pierre J Kicken; Marij J Frantzen; Jos M A van Engelshoven; Joachim E Wildberger; Gerrit J Kemerink
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2020-02-07

7.  Effect of Silicone Rubber-Lead (SR-Pb) Thickness on Dose Reduction and Image Quality as Gonad Shield.

Authors:  Zahroh F; Anam C; Sutanto H; Irdawati Y; Arifin Z; Kartikasari Y
Journal:  J Biomed Phys Eng       Date:  2020-12-01

8.  European consensus on patient contact shielding.

Authors:  Peter Hiles; Patrick Gilligan; John Damilakis; Eric Briers; Cristian Candela-Juan; Dario Faj; Shane Foley; Guy Frija; Claudio Granata; Hugo de Las Heras Gala; Ruben Pauwels; Marta Sans Merce; Georgios Simantirakis; Eliseo Vano
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2021-12-23

9.  Using patient shielding - What is the risk?

Authors:  Peter Hiles
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2021-08-04       Impact factor: 3.629

10.  Gonadal shield: is it the Albatross hanging around the neck of developmental dysplasia of the hip research?

Authors:  A Kumar; W W Chau; A L-H Hung; J K-T Wong; B K W Ng; J C Y Cheng
Journal:  J Child Orthop       Date:  2018-12-01       Impact factor: 1.548

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.