Literature DB >> 34347543

Using patient shielding - What is the risk?

Peter Hiles1.   

Abstract

The practice of placing radiation protective shielding on patients ('in contact') in order to reduce the dose to certain radiosensitive organs for diagnostic X-ray examination, has been employed for decades. However, there has been a growing body of evidence that this practice is often ineffective or even counterproductive and the use of such shielding can also overemphasise the hazards of ionising radiation in the public mind. This has led to a growing disparity in the application of patient contact shielding and culminated in several professional bodies issuing guidance and statements to provide a consistent approach to patient contact shielding. This, in turn, has led to a healthy discussion and re-evaluation of when and why patient contact shielding should be used, where the main issue centres around the criteria used to arrive at the recommendations. The decision process involves considering, among others, the reported effectiveness of the shielding and a subjective assessment of the subsequent risks from their use. In order to improve the transparency of these recommendations, it is therefore suggested that a threshold for dose and/or risk should be clearly stated, below which no protection is required. A suggested starting point for defining this threshold is discussed. This would enhance uniformity of application and provide clarity for staff, patients and the public. It would also ensure that any future research in this area could be easily incorporated into the general guidance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34347543      PMCID: PMC9328061          DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20210701

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Radiol        ISSN: 0007-1285            Impact factor:   3.629


  7 in total

1.  The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP publication 103.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ann ICRP       Date:  2007

2.  Reforming the debate around radiation risk.

Authors:  James C Ross; Dijana Vilić; Benjamin Fongenie
Journal:  J Radiol Prot       Date:  2019-04-05       Impact factor: 1.394

3.  The use of dose quantities in radiological protection: ICRP publication 147 Ann ICRP 50(1) 2021.

Authors:  J D Harrison; M Balonov; F Bochud; C J Martin; H-G Menzel; R Smith-Bindman; P Ortiz-López; J R Simmonds; R Wakeford
Journal:  J Radiol Prot       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 1.394

4.  Patient Shielding in Diagnostic Imaging: Discontinuing a Legacy Practice.

Authors:  Rebecca M Marsh; Michael Silosky
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2019-01-23       Impact factor: 3.959

5.  Patient shielding: The need for a European consensus statement.

Authors:  P Gilligan; J Damilakis
Journal:  Phys Med       Date:  2021-03-05       Impact factor: 2.685

Review 6.  Use of out-of-field contact shielding on patients in medical imaging: A review of current guidelines, recommendations and legislative documents.

Authors:  Cristian Candela-Juan; Olivera Ciraj-Bjelac; Marta Sans Merce; Jérémie Dabin; Dario Faj; Aoife Gallagher; Hugo de Las Heras Gala; Željka Knežević; Françoise Malchair; Francesca De Monte; George Simantirakis; Chrysoula Theodorakou
Journal:  Phys Med       Date:  2021-05-27       Impact factor: 2.685

7.  More harm than good? The anatomy of misguided shielding of the ovaries.

Authors:  S L Fawcett; A C Gomez; S J Barter; M Ditchfield; P Set
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2011-11-17       Impact factor: 3.039

  7 in total
  1 in total

1.  Contemporary issues in radiation protection in medical imaging: introductory editorial.

Authors:  Madan M Rehani; Zoe Brady
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2021-10       Impact factor: 3.629

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.