Literature DB >> 30967078

Higher-level pattern features provide additional information to birds when recognizing and rejecting parasitic eggs.

Mary Caswell Stoddard1, Benedict G Hogan1, Martin Stevens2, Claire N Spottiswoode3,4.   

Abstract

Despite a recent explosion of research on pattern recognition, in both neuroscience and computer vision, we lack a basic understanding of how most animals perceive and respond to patterns in the wild. Avian brood parasites and their hosts provide an ideal study system for investigating the mechanisms of pattern recognition. The cuckoo finch, Anomalospiza imberbis, and its host the tawny-flanked prinia, Prinia subflava, lay highly polymorphic eggs with a great deal of variation in colour and patterning, with the cuckoo finch capable of close egg mimicry. Behavioural experiments in Zambia have previously shown that prinias use colour and multiple 'low-level' (occurring in early stages of visual processing) pattern attributes, derived from spatial frequency analysis, when rejecting foreign eggs. Here, we explore the extent to which host birds might also use 'higher-level' pattern attributes, derived from a feature detection algorithm, to make rejection decisions. Using a SIFT-based pattern recognition algorithm, NaturePatternMatch, we show that hosts are more likely to reject a foreign egg if its higher-level pattern features-which capture information about the shape and orientation of markings-differ from those of the host eggs. A revised statistical model explains about 37% variance in egg rejection behaviour, and differences in colour, low-level and higher-level pattern features all predict rejection, accounting for 42, 44 and 14% of the explained variance, respectively. Thus, higher-level pattern features provide a small but measurable improvement to the original model and may be especially useful when colour and low-level pattern features provide hosts with little information. Understanding the relative importance of low- and higher-level pattern features is a valuable goal for future work on animal coloration, especially in the contexts of mimicry, camouflage and individual recognition. This article is part of the theme issue 'The coevolutionary biology of brood parasitism: from mechanism to pattern'.

Entities:  

Keywords:  animal coloration; avian vision; brood parasitism; coevolution; mimicry; pattern recognition

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30967078      PMCID: PMC6388034          DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2018.0197

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8436            Impact factor:   6.237


  25 in total

1.  Discrimination of oriented visual textures by poultry chicks.

Authors:  C D Jones; D Osorio
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 2.  Animal Coloration Patterns: Linking Spatial Vision to Quantitative Analysis.

Authors:  Mary Caswell Stoddard; Daniel Osorio
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2019-01-16       Impact factor: 3.926

Review 3.  Colour, vision and coevolution in avian brood parasitism.

Authors:  Mary Caswell Stoddard; Mark E Hauber
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2017-07-05       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Host-parasite arms races and rapid changes in bird egg appearance.

Authors:  Claire N Spottiswoode; Martin Stevens
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2012-03-23       Impact factor: 3.926

5.  Pattern recognition algorithm reveals how birds evolve individual egg pattern signatures.

Authors:  Mary Caswell Stoddard; Rebecca M Kilner; Christopher Town
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2014-06-18       Impact factor: 14.919

6.  Nestling polymorphism in a cuckoo-host system.

Authors:  Nozomu J Sato; Keita D Tanaka; Yuji Okahisa; Masato Yamamichi; Ralph Kuehn; Roman Gula; Keisuke Ueda; Jörn Theuerkauf
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2015-12-21       Impact factor: 10.834

7.  Hosts of avian brood parasites have evolved egg signatures with elevated information content.

Authors:  Eleanor M Caves; Martin Stevens; Edwin S Iversen; Claire N Spottiswoode
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-07-07       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Quantifying camouflage: how to predict detectability from appearance.

Authors:  Jolyon Troscianko; John Skelhorn; Martin Stevens
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2017-01-06       Impact factor: 3.260

9.  Visual discrimination of polymorphic nestlings in a cuckoo-host system.

Authors:  Alfredo Attisano; Nozomu J Sato; Keita D Tanaka; Yuji Okahisa; Ralph Kuehn; Roman Gula; Keisuke Ueda; Jörn Theuerkauf
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-07-09       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Repeated targeting of the same hosts by a brood parasite compromises host egg rejection.

Authors:  Martin Stevens; Jolyon Troscianko; Claire N Spottiswoode
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 14.919

View more
  3 in total

1.  Avian egg and nestling detection in the wild: should we rely on visual models or behavioural experiments?

Authors:  Jesús M Avilés
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2020-05-18       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Visual complexity of egg patterns predicts egg rejection according to Weber's law.

Authors:  Tanmay Dixit; Andrei L Apostol; Kuan-Chi Chen; Anthony J C Fulford; Christopher P Town; Claire N Spottiswoode
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2022-07-13       Impact factor: 5.530

3.  Interclutch variability in egg characteristics in two species of rail: Is maternal identity encoded in eggshell patterns?

Authors:  Emily W Johnson; Susan B McRae
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-01-13       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.