Literature DB >> 34383151

How visual system configuration can play a role in individual recognition: a visual modeling study.

Rebecca Trapp1, Esteban Fernández-Juricic2.   

Abstract

Many species rely on individual recognition (i.e., the use of individual signals to identify and remember a conspecific) to tune their social interactions. However, little is known about how the configuration of the sensory system may affect the perception of individual recognition signals over space. Utilizing a visual modeling approach, we quantified (1) the threshold distance between the receiver and the signaler at which individual recognition can no longer accurately occur, and (2) the regions of the head most likely to contain the individual recognition signals. We used chickens (Gallus gallus) as our study species, as they use visual individual recognition and additionally have a well-studied visual system. We took pictures of different individuals and followed a visual modeling approach considering color vision, visual acuity, and pattern processing of the receiver. We found that distance degrades the quality of information in potential individual recognition signals. We estimated that the neighbor distance at which a receiver may have difficulty recognizing a conspecific was between 0.25 and 0.30 m in chickens, which may be related to a decrease in available features of the potential signal. This signal perception threshold closely matches the recognition distance predicted by previous behavioral approaches. Additionally, we found that certain regions of the head (beak, cheek, comb, eye) may be good candidates for individual recognition signals. Overall, our findings support that recognition in chickens occurs at short distances due to constraints imposed by their visual system, which can affect the costs and benefits associated with social spacing in groups.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Individual recognition; Neighbor distances; Social behavior; Visual modeling; Visual signals

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34383151     DOI: 10.1007/s10071-021-01548-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anim Cogn        ISSN: 1435-9448            Impact factor:   3.084


  20 in total

Review 1.  The visual ecology of avian photoreceptors.

Authors:  N S Hart
Journal:  Prog Retin Eye Res       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 21.198

2.  Long-term vocal recognition in the northern fur seal.

Authors:  S J Insley
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-07-27       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Visual pigments of chicken and pigeon.

Authors:  V I Govardovskiĭ; L V Zueva
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1977       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 4.  The dominance-submission hierarchy in the social behavior of the domestic chicken.

Authors:  R F Gottier
Journal:  J Genet Psychol       Date:  1968-06       Impact factor: 1.509

5.  Discriminability of facial regions used by the domestic chicken in maintaining the social dominance order.

Authors:  D K Candland
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1969-10

Review 6.  Parting self from others: Individual and self-recognition in birds.

Authors:  Katharina F Brecht; Andreas Nieder
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2020-06-11       Impact factor: 8.989

7.  Spectral sensitivity, spatial resolution and temporal resolution and their implications for conspecific signalling in cleaner shrimp.

Authors:  Eleanor M Caves; Tamara M Frank; Sönke Johnsen
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2016-01-08       Impact factor: 3.312

8.  Signaling individual identity versus quality: a model and case studies with ruffs, queleas, and house finches.

Authors:  J Dale; D B Lank; H K Reeve
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 3.926

9.  Mice: individual recognition by olfactory cues.

Authors:  J M Bowers; B K Alexander
Journal:  Science       Date:  1967-12-01       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  The coefficient of determination R2 and intra-class correlation coefficient from generalized linear mixed-effects models revisited and expanded.

Authors:  Shinichi Nakagawa; Paul C D Johnson; Holger Schielzeth
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2017-09-13       Impact factor: 4.118

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.