Literature DB >> 22056772

Molecular profiling of common fragile sites in human fibroblasts.

Benoî Le Tallec1, Bernard Dutrillaux, Anne-Marie Lachages, Gael Armel Millot, Olivier Brison, Michelle Debatisse.   

Abstract

Common fragile sites have been mapped primarily in lymphocytes, but recent analyses show that the setting of these sites relies on cell type-dependent replication programs. Using a new approach, we molecularly mapped common fragile sites in human fibroblasts and showed that commitment to fragility depends on similar replication features in fibroblasts and lymphocytes, although different loci are committed in each cell type. Notably, the common fragile sites that we identified overlapped heretofore unexplained deletion clusters observed in tumors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22056772     DOI: 10.1038/nsmb.2155

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Struct Mol Biol        ISSN: 1545-9985            Impact factor:   15.369


  16 in total

Review 1.  Space and time in the nucleus: developmental control of replication timing and chromosome architecture.

Authors:  D M Gilbert; S-I Takebayashi; T Ryba; J Lu; B D Pope; K A Wilson; I Hiratani
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol       Date:  2010-12-07

Review 2.  Eukaryotic DNA replication origins: many choices for appropriate answers.

Authors:  Marcel Méchali
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 94.444

3.  Premature condensation induces breaks at the interface of early and late replicating chromosome bands bearing common fragile sites.

Authors:  Eliane El Achkar; Michelle Gerbault-Seureau; Martine Muleris; Bernard Dutrillaux; Michelle Debatisse
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-12-05       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Common fragile sites are conserved features of human and mouse chromosomes and relate to large active genes.

Authors:  Anne Helmrich; Karen Stout-Weider; Klaus Hermann; Evelin Schrock; Thomas Heiden
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2006-09-05       Impact factor: 9.043

Review 5.  Large common fragile site genes and cancer.

Authors:  David I Smith; Sarah McAvoy; Yu Zhu; Damon S Perez
Journal:  Semin Cancer Biol       Date:  2006-10-26       Impact factor: 15.707

6.  53BP1 nuclear bodies form around DNA lesions generated by mitotic transmission of chromosomes under replication stress.

Authors:  Claudia Lukas; Velibor Savic; Simon Bekker-Jensen; Carsten Doil; Beate Neumann; Ronni Sølvhøj Pedersen; Merete Grøfte; Kok Lung Chan; Ian David Hickson; Jiri Bartek; Jiri Lukas
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2011-02-13       Impact factor: 28.824

Review 7.  Roles of FHIT and WWOX fragile genes in cancer.

Authors:  Dimitrios Iliopoulos; Gulnur Guler; Shuang-Yin Han; Teresa Druck; Michelle Ottey; Kelly A McCorkell; Kay Huebner
Journal:  Cancer Lett       Date:  2005-10-12       Impact factor: 8.679

8.  Signatures of mutation and selection in the cancer genome.

Authors:  Graham R Bignell; Chris D Greenman; Helen Davies; Adam P Butler; Sarah Edkins; Jenny M Andrews; Gemma Buck; Lina Chen; David Beare; Calli Latimer; Sara Widaa; Jonathon Hinton; Ciara Fahey; Beiyuan Fu; Sajani Swamy; Gillian L Dalgliesh; Bin T Teh; Panos Deloukas; Fengtang Yang; Peter J Campbell; P Andrew Futreal; Michael R Stratton
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2010-02-18       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Replication stress induces sister-chromatid bridging at fragile site loci in mitosis.

Authors:  Kok Lung Chan; Timea Palmai-Pallag; Songmin Ying; Ian D Hickson
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2009-05-24       Impact factor: 28.824

Review 10.  Chromosome fragile sites.

Authors:  Sandra G Durkin; Thomas W Glover
Journal:  Annu Rev Genet       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 16.830

View more
  57 in total

Review 1.  DNA replication stress: from molecular mechanisms to human disease.

Authors:  Sergio Muñoz; Juan Méndez
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2016-01-21       Impact factor: 4.316

2.  Oncogenes create a unique landscape of fragile sites.

Authors:  Karin Miron; Tamar Golan-Lev; Raz Dvir; Eyal Ben-David; Batsheva Kerem
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2015-05-11       Impact factor: 14.919

Review 3.  The role of fork stalling and DNA structures in causing chromosome fragility.

Authors:  Simran Kaushal; Catherine H Freudenreich
Journal:  Genes Chromosomes Cancer       Date:  2019-01-29       Impact factor: 5.006

Review 4.  The impact of replication stress on replication dynamics and DNA damage in vertebrate cells.

Authors:  Hervé Técher; Stéphane Koundrioukoff; Alain Nicolas; Michelle Debatisse
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2017-07-17       Impact factor: 53.242

Review 5.  Replication stress and mechanisms of CNV formation.

Authors:  Martin F Arlt; Thomas E Wilson; Thomas W Glover
Journal:  Curr Opin Genet Dev       Date:  2012-02-23       Impact factor: 5.578

Review 6.  Impediments to replication fork movement: stabilisation, reactivation and genome instability.

Authors:  Sarah Lambert; Antony M Carr
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2013-02-28       Impact factor: 4.316

Review 7.  Transcription and recombination: when RNA meets DNA.

Authors:  Andrés Aguilera; Hélène Gaillard
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2014-08-01       Impact factor: 10.005

Review 8.  Replication fork recovery and regulation of common fragile sites stability.

Authors:  Annapaola Franchitto; Pietro Pichierri
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2014-09-13       Impact factor: 9.261

Review 9.  Interplay between genetic and epigenetic factors governs common fragile site instability in cancer.

Authors:  Efrat Ozeri-Galai; Michal Tur-Sinai; Assaf C Bester; Batsheva Kerem
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2014-10-09       Impact factor: 9.261

10.  Selectivity of ORC binding sites and the relation to replication timing, fragile sites, and deletions in cancers.

Authors:  Benoit Miotto; Zhe Ji; Kevin Struhl
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-07-19       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.