Literature DB >> 21317883

53BP1 nuclear bodies form around DNA lesions generated by mitotic transmission of chromosomes under replication stress.

Claudia Lukas1, Velibor Savic, Simon Bekker-Jensen, Carsten Doil, Beate Neumann, Ronni Sølvhøj Pedersen, Merete Grøfte, Kok Lung Chan, Ian David Hickson, Jiri Bartek, Jiri Lukas.   

Abstract

Completion of genome duplication is challenged by structural and topological barriers that impede progression of replication forks. Although this can seriously undermine genome integrity, the fate of DNA with unresolved replication intermediates is not known. Here, we show that mild replication stress increases the frequency of chromosomal lesions that are transmitted to daughter cells. Throughout G1, these lesions are sequestered in nuclear compartments marked by p53-binding protein 1 (53BP1) and other chromatin-associated genome caretakers. We show that the number of such 53BP1 nuclear bodies increases after genetic ablation of BLM, a DNA helicase associated with dissolution of entangled DNA. Conversely, 53BP1 nuclear bodies are partially suppressed by knocking down SMC2, a condensin subunit required for mechanical stability of mitotic chromosomes. Finally, we provide evidence that 53BP1 nuclear bodies shield chromosomal fragile sites sequestered in these compartments against erosion. Together, these data indicate that restoration of DNA or chromatin integrity at loci prone to replication problems requires mitotic transmission to the next cell generations.
© 2011 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21317883     DOI: 10.1038/ncb2201

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Cell Biol        ISSN: 1465-7392            Impact factor:   28.824


  50 in total

1.  DNA damage foci in mitosis are devoid of 53BP1.

Authors:  Glyn Nelson; Matthias Buhmann; Thomas von Zglinicki
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2009-10-19       Impact factor: 4.534

2.  Phenotypic profiling of the human genome by time-lapse microscopy reveals cell division genes.

Authors:  Beate Neumann; Thomas Walter; Jean-Karim Hériché; Jutta Bulkescher; Holger Erfle; Christian Conrad; Phill Rogers; Ina Poser; Michael Held; Urban Liebel; Cihan Cetin; Frank Sieckmann; Gregoire Pau; Rolf Kabbe; Annelie Wünsche; Venkata Satagopam; Michael H A Schmitz; Catherine Chapuis; Daniel W Gerlich; Reinhard Schneider; Roland Eils; Wolfgang Huber; Jan-Michael Peters; Anthony A Hyman; Richard Durbin; Rainer Pepperkok; Jan Ellenberg
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2010-04-01       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  BubR1- and Polo-coated DNA tethers facilitate poleward segregation of acentric chromatids.

Authors:  Anne Royou; Mary E Gagou; Roger Karess; William Sullivan
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2010-01-22       Impact factor: 41.582

4.  Essential global role of CDC14 in DNA synthesis revealed by chromosome underreplication unrecognized by checkpoints in cdc14 mutants.

Authors:  Stanimir Dulev; Christelle de Renty; Rajvi Mehta; Ivan Minkov; Etienne Schwob; Alexander Strunnikov
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-08-07       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  DNA damage response as a candidate anti-cancer barrier in early human tumorigenesis.

Authors:  Jirina Bartkova; Zuzana Horejsí; Karen Koed; Alwin Krämer; Frederic Tort; Karsten Zieger; Per Guldberg; Maxwell Sehested; Jahn M Nesland; Claudia Lukas; Torben Ørntoft; Jiri Lukas; Jiri Bartek
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2005-04-14       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Chromatin relaxation in response to DNA double-strand breaks is modulated by a novel ATM- and KAP-1 dependent pathway.

Authors:  Yael Ziv; Dana Bielopolski; Yaron Galanty; Claudia Lukas; Yoichi Taya; David C Schultz; Jiri Lukas; Simon Bekker-Jensen; Jiri Bartek; Yosef Shiloh
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2006-07-23       Impact factor: 28.824

7.  53BP1-dependent robust localized KAP-1 phosphorylation is essential for heterochromatic DNA double-strand break repair.

Authors:  Angela T Noon; Atsushi Shibata; Nicole Rief; Markus Löbrich; Grant S Stewart; Penelope A Jeggo; Aaron A Goodarzi
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2010-01-17       Impact factor: 28.824

8.  DNA damage signaling in response to double-strand breaks during mitosis.

Authors:  Simona Giunta; Rimma Belotserkovskaya; Stephen P Jackson
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2010-07-26       Impact factor: 10.539

9.  BLM is required for faithful chromosome segregation and its localization defines a class of ultrafine anaphase bridges.

Authors:  Kok-Lung Chan; Phillip S North; Ian D Hickson
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2007-06-28       Impact factor: 11.598

Review 10.  Chromosome fragile sites.

Authors:  Sandra G Durkin; Thomas W Glover
Journal:  Annu Rev Genet       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 16.830

View more
  342 in total

1.  Nucleoporin NUP153 guards genome integrity by promoting nuclear import of 53BP1.

Authors:  P Moudry; C Lukas; L Macurek; B Neumann; J-K Heriche; R Pepperkok; J Ellenberg; Z Hodny; J Lukas; J Bartek
Journal:  Cell Death Differ       Date:  2011-11-11       Impact factor: 15.828

Review 2.  Making a long story short: noncoding RNAs and chromosome change.

Authors:  J D Brown; S E Mitchell; R J O'Neill
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2011-11-09       Impact factor: 3.821

3.  Thresholds of replication stress signaling in cancer development and treatment.

Authors:  Jiri Bartek; Martin Mistrik; Jirina Bartkova
Journal:  Nat Struct Mol Biol       Date:  2012-01-05       Impact factor: 15.369

Review 4.  Insights into phosphorylation-dependent mechanisms regulating USP1 protein stability during the cell cycle.

Authors:  Xiomaris M Cotto-Rios; Mathew J K Jones; Tony T Huang
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2011-12-01       Impact factor: 4.534

5.  Molecular profiling of common fragile sites in human fibroblasts.

Authors:  Benoî Le Tallec; Bernard Dutrillaux; Anne-Marie Lachages; Gael Armel Millot; Olivier Brison; Michelle Debatisse
Journal:  Nat Struct Mol Biol       Date:  2011-11-06       Impact factor: 15.369

Review 6.  More than just a focus: The chromatin response to DNA damage and its role in genome integrity maintenance.

Authors:  Jiri Lukas; Claudia Lukas; Jiri Bartek
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2011-10-03       Impact factor: 28.824

7.  Disruption of CDK-resistant chromatin association by pRB causes DNA damage, mitotic errors, and reduces Condensin II recruitment.

Authors:  Charles A Ishak; Courtney H Coschi; Michael V Roes; Frederick A Dick
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2017-07-19       Impact factor: 4.534

8.  Competing memories of mitogen and p53 signalling control cell-cycle entry.

Authors:  Hee Won Yang; Mingyu Chung; Takamasa Kudo; Tobias Meyer
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2017-09-06       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 9.  53BP1: pro choice in DNA repair.

Authors:  Michal Zimmermann; Titia de Lange
Journal:  Trends Cell Biol       Date:  2013-10-04       Impact factor: 20.808

10.  microRNA-34a promotes DNA damage and mitotic catastrophe.

Authors:  Alexander V Kofman; Jungeun Kim; So Yeon Park; Evan Dupart; Christopher Letson; Yongde Bao; Kai Ding; Quan Chen; David Schiff; James Larner; Roger Abounader
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2013-09-19       Impact factor: 4.534

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.