Literature DB >> 25297918

Interplay between genetic and epigenetic factors governs common fragile site instability in cancer.

Efrat Ozeri-Galai1, Michal Tur-Sinai, Assaf C Bester, Batsheva Kerem.   

Abstract

Common fragile sites (CFSs) are regions within the normal chromosomal structure that were characterized as hotspots for genomic instability in cancer almost 30 years ago. In recent years, many efforts have been made to understand the basis of CFS fragility and their involvement in the genomic signature of instability found in malignant tumors. CFSs are among the first regions to undergo genomic instability during cancer development because of their intrinsic sensitivity to replication stress conditions, which result from oncogene expression. The preferred sensitivity of CFSs to replication stress stems from various mechanisms including: replication fork arrest at AT-rich repeats, origin paucity along large genomic regions, failure in activation of dormant origins, late replication timing, collision between replication and transcription along large genes, all leading to incomplete replication of the CFS region and resulting in chromosomal instability. Here we review shared and unique characteristics of CFSs, their underlying causes and implications, particularly for the development of cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25297918     DOI: 10.1007/s00018-014-1719-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci        ISSN: 1420-682X            Impact factor:   9.261


  111 in total

1.  Collisions between replication and transcription complexes cause common fragile site instability at the longest human genes.

Authors:  Anne Helmrich; Monica Ballarino; Laszlo Tora
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2011-12-23       Impact factor: 17.970

2.  Fragile sites are preferential targets for integrations of MLV vectors in gene therapy.

Authors:  A C Bester; M Schwartz; M Schmidt; A Garrigue; S Hacein-Bey-Abina; M Cavazzana-Calvo; N Ben-Porat; C Von Kalle; A Fischer; B Kerem
Journal:  Gene Ther       Date:  2006-03-02       Impact factor: 5.250

3.  FRA3B extends over a broad region and contains a spontaneous HPV16 integration site: direct evidence for the coincidence of viral integration sites and fragile sites.

Authors:  C M Wilke; B K Hall; A Hoge; W Paradee; D I Smith; T W Glover
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 6.150

Review 4.  Large common fragile site genes and cancer.

Authors:  David I Smith; Sarah McAvoy; Yu Zhu; Damon S Perez
Journal:  Semin Cancer Biol       Date:  2006-10-26       Impact factor: 15.707

5.  The role of viral integration in the development of cervical cancer.

Authors:  Tingxi Yu; Matthew J Ferber; Tak Hong Cheung; Tong Kwok Hung Chung; Yick Fu Wong; David I Smith
Journal:  Cancer Genet Cytogenet       Date:  2005-04-01

6.  Non-transcriptional control of DNA replication by c-Myc.

Authors:  David Dominguez-Sola; Carol Y Ying; Carla Grandori; Luca Ruggiero; Brenden Chen; Muyang Li; Denise A Galloway; Wei Gu; Jean Gautier; Riccardo Dalla-Favera
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2007-06-27       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Impaired replication dynamics at the FRA3B common fragile site.

Authors:  Aparna Palakodeti; Isabelle Lucas; Yanwen Jiang; David J Young; Anthony A Fernald; Theodore Karrison; Michelle M Le Beau
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2010-01-01       Impact factor: 6.150

8.  Comparison of seven cell lines derived from human gastric carcinomas.

Authors:  T Motoyama; H Hojo; H Watanabe
Journal:  Acta Pathol Jpn       Date:  1986-01

9.  Interplay between ATM and ATR in the regulation of common fragile site stability.

Authors:  E Ozeri-Galai; M Schwartz; A Rahat; B Kerem
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2007-10-15       Impact factor: 9.867

10.  Oncogene-induced replication stress preferentially targets common fragile sites in preneoplastic lesions. A genome-wide study.

Authors:  P K Tsantoulis; A Kotsinas; P P Sfikakis; K Evangelou; M Sideridou; B Levy; L Mo; C Kittas; X-R Wu; A G Papavassiliou; V G Gorgoulis
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2007-12-17       Impact factor: 9.867

View more
  12 in total

Review 1.  Mechanisms of gene targeting in higher eukaryotes.

Authors:  Akinori Tokunaga; Hirofumi Anai; Katsuhiro Hanada
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2015-10-27       Impact factor: 9.261

Review 2.  Fragility Extraordinaire: Unsolved Mysteries of Chromosome Fragile Sites.

Authors:  Wenyi Feng; Arijita Chakraborty
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2017       Impact factor: 2.622

Review 3.  Order from clutter: selective interactions at mammalian replication origins.

Authors:  Mirit I Aladjem; Christophe E Redon
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2016-11-21       Impact factor: 53.242

4.  DNA secondary structure at chromosomal fragile sites in human disease.

Authors:  Ryan G Thys; Christine E Lehman; Levi C T Pierce; Yuh-Hwa Wang
Journal:  Curr Genomics       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 2.236

Review 5.  Tumor Suppressor Genes within Common Fragile Sites Are Active Players in the DNA Damage Response.

Authors:  Idit Hazan; Thomas G Hofmann; Rami I Aqeilan
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2016-12-15       Impact factor: 5.917

Review 6.  DNA Replication Control During Drosophila Development: Insights into the Onset of S Phase, Replication Initiation, and Fork Progression.

Authors:  Brian L Hua; Terry L Orr-Weaver
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 7.  Perturbations in the Replication Program Contribute to Genomic Instability in Cancer.

Authors:  Britny Blumenfeld; Micha Ben-Zimra; Itamar Simon
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2017-05-25       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 8.  Rescue from replication stress during mitosis.

Authors:  Michalis Fragkos; Valeria Naim
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2017-02-06       Impact factor: 4.534

9.  Dynamic changes in ORC localization and replication fork progression during tissue differentiation.

Authors:  Brian L Hua; George W Bell; Helena Kashevsky; Jessica R Von Stetina; Terry L Orr-Weaver
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2018-08-22       Impact factor: 3.969

10.  Fragile Sites of 'Valencia' Sweet Orange (Citrus sinensis) Chromosomes Are Related with Active 45s rDNA.

Authors:  Hong Lan; Chun-Li Chen; Yin Miao; Chang-Xiu Yu; Wen-Wu Guo; Qiang Xu; Xiu-Xin Deng
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-15       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.