Literature DB >> 25216703

Replication fork recovery and regulation of common fragile sites stability.

Annapaola Franchitto1, Pietro Pichierri.   

Abstract

The acquisition of genomic instability is a triggering factor in cancer development, and common fragile sites (CFS) are the preferential target of chromosomal instability under conditions of replicative stress in the human genome. Although the mechanisms leading to CFS expression and the cellular factors required to suppress CFS instability remain largely undefined, it is clear that DNA becomes more susceptible to breakage when replication is impaired. The models proposed so far to explain how CFS instability arises imply that replication fork progression along these regions is perturbed due to intrinsic features of fragile sites and events that directly affect DNA replication. The observation that proteins implicated in the safe recovery of stalled forks or in engaging recombination at collapsed forks increase CFS expression when downregulated or mutated suggests that the stabilization and recovery of perturbed replication forks are crucial to guarantee CFS integrity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25216703     DOI: 10.1007/s00018-014-1718-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci        ISSN: 1420-682X            Impact factor:   9.261


  95 in total

Review 1.  Cell cycle checkpoint signaling through the ATM and ATR kinases.

Authors:  R T Abraham
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2001-09-01       Impact factor: 11.361

2.  Chk1 promotes replication fork progression by controlling replication initiation.

Authors:  Eva Petermann; Mick Woodcock; Thomas Helleday
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-08-30       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  An AT-rich sequence in human common fragile site FRA16D causes fork stalling and chromosome breakage in S. cerevisiae.

Authors:  Haihua Zhang; Catherine H Freudenreich
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2007-08-03       Impact factor: 17.970

Review 4.  Break-induced replication: what is it and what is it for?

Authors:  Bertrand Llorente; Catherine E Smith; Lorraine S Symington
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2008-01-14       Impact factor: 4.534

5.  DNA polymerase alpha inhibition by aphidicolin induces gaps and breaks at common fragile sites in human chromosomes.

Authors:  T W Glover; C Berger; J Coyle; B Echo
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 4.132

6.  Continued primer synthesis at stalled replication forks contributes to checkpoint activation.

Authors:  Christopher Van; Shan Yan; W Matthew Michael; Shou Waga; Karlene A Cimprich
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2010-04-12       Impact factor: 10.539

7.  Claspin inhibition leads to fragile site expression.

Authors:  Maria Luisa Focarelli; Samuela Soza; Linda Mannini; Marianna Paulis; Alessandra Montecucco; Antonio Musio
Journal:  Genes Chromosomes Cancer       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 5.006

8.  The RecQ helicase WRN is required for normal replication fork progression after DNA damage or replication fork arrest.

Authors:  Julia M Sidorova; Nianzhen Li; Albert Folch; Raymond J Monnat
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2008-01-04       Impact factor: 4.534

Review 9.  Chromosome fragile sites.

Authors:  Sandra G Durkin; Thomas W Glover
Journal:  Annu Rev Genet       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 16.830

10.  Chk1 regulates the density of active replication origins during the vertebrate S phase.

Authors:  Apolinar Maya-Mendoza; Eva Petermann; David A F Gillespie; Keith W Caldecott; Dean A Jackson
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2007-05-10       Impact factor: 11.598

View more
  13 in total

1.  WRNIP1 protects stalled forks from degradation and promotes fork restart after replication stress.

Authors:  Giuseppe Leuzzi; Veronica Marabitti; Pietro Pichierri; Annapaola Franchitto
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2016-05-30       Impact factor: 11.598

2.  Human CST Facilitates Genome-wide RAD51 Recruitment to GC-Rich Repetitive Sequences in Response to Replication Stress.

Authors:  Megan Chastain; Qing Zhou; Olga Shiva; Maria Fadri-Moskwik; Leanne Whitmore; Pingping Jia; Xueyu Dai; Chenhui Huang; Ping Ye; Weihang Chai
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2016-08-02       Impact factor: 9.423

Review 3.  Order from clutter: selective interactions at mammalian replication origins.

Authors:  Mirit I Aladjem; Christophe E Redon
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2016-11-21       Impact factor: 53.242

Review 4.  Making Choices: DNA Replication Fork Recovery Mechanisms.

Authors:  Christine M Kondratick; M Todd Washington; Maria Spies
Journal:  Semin Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2020-10-22       Impact factor: 7.499

5.  DNA secondary structure at chromosomal fragile sites in human disease.

Authors:  Ryan G Thys; Christine E Lehman; Levi C T Pierce; Yuh-Hwa Wang
Journal:  Curr Genomics       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 2.236

6.  The WRN exonuclease domain protects nascent strands from pathological MRE11/EXO1-dependent degradation.

Authors:  Chiara Iannascoli; Valentina Palermo; Ivana Murfuni; Annapaola Franchitto; Pietro Pichierri
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2015-08-14       Impact factor: 16.971

7.  SLX4 Prevents GEN1-Dependent DSBs During DNA Replication Arrest Under Pathological Conditions in Human Cells.

Authors:  Eva Malacaria; Annapaola Franchitto; Pietro Pichierri
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-03-14       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Alterations in Synthesis and Repair of DNA during the Development of Loach Misgurnus fossilis.

Authors:  Leonid V Gening; Andrei V Lakhin; Irina V Makarova; Valentina V Nenasheva; Ludmila E Andreeva; Vyacheslav Z Tarantul
Journal:  J Dev Biol       Date:  2016-01-27

9.  RAD51 and mitotic function of mus81 are essential for recovery from low-dose of camptothecin in the absence of the WRN exonuclease.

Authors:  Francesca Antonella Aiello; Anita Palma; Eva Malacaria; Li Zheng; Judith L Campbell; Binghui Shen; Annapaola Franchitto; Pietro Pichierri
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2019-07-26       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  Inducible SMARCAL1 knockdown in iPSC reveals a link between replication stress and altered expression of master differentiation genes.

Authors:  Giusj Monia Pugliese; Federico Salaris; Valentina Palermo; Veronica Marabitti; Nicolò Morina; Alessandro Rosa; Annapaola Franchitto; Pietro Pichierri
Journal:  Dis Model Mech       Date:  2019-10-17       Impact factor: 5.758

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.