W J Lee1, S Chong, J S Seo, H J Shim. 1. Department of Radiology, Chung-Ang University Medical Center, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Seoul Republic of Korea.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of our study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of transthoracic fine-needle aspiration biopsy (TFNAB) using a C-arm cone-beam CT (CBCT) system and to assess risk factors for immediate post-procedural complications in patients with lung lesions. METHODS: From October 2007 to April 2009, 94 TFNAB procedures using a C-arm system were studied in 91 patients with pulmonary lesions a chest CT scans. We retrospectively reviewed the patients' radiological and histopathological findings. We evaluated the lesion size, lesion abutted to pleura and presence or absence of emphysema along the needle path, lesion depth, visibility of target lesion and patient's position. Pneumothorax and pulmonary haemorrhage were assessed after TFNAB. Overall diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) were analysed. RESULTS: In 94 TFNAB procedures, 58 lesions were malignant and 36 were benign. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV and overall diagnostic accuracy rate of TFNAB were 93.1%, 100%, 100%, 90% and 97.9%, respectively. Pneumothorax was developed in 24 procedures. None of the parameters showed significant impact on the frequency of the pneumothorax. Overall haemorrhage occurred in 43 procedures. The incidence of overall haemorrhage was higher in patients with smaller lesions, longer pleural distance and pleural abutted lesions (p<0.05). Differences in visibility at projection radiographs were statistically significant between patients with or without perilesional haemorrhage (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: Transthoracic fine-needle aspiration biopsy using a C-arm CBCT system is feasible for imaging guidance of lung lesion and early detection of the procedural-related complications.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of our study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of transthoracic fine-needle aspiration biopsy (TFNAB) using a C-arm cone-beam CT (CBCT) system and to assess risk factors for immediate post-procedural complications in patients with lung lesions. METHODS: From October 2007 to April 2009, 94 TFNAB procedures using a C-arm system were studied in 91 patients with pulmonary lesions a chest CT scans. We retrospectively reviewed the patients' radiological and histopathological findings. We evaluated the lesion size, lesion abutted to pleura and presence or absence of emphysema along the needle path, lesion depth, visibility of target lesion and patient's position. Pneumothorax and pulmonary haemorrhage were assessed after TFNAB. Overall diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) were analysed. RESULTS: In 94 TFNAB procedures, 58 lesions were malignant and 36 were benign. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV and overall diagnostic accuracy rate of TFNAB were 93.1%, 100%, 100%, 90% and 97.9%, respectively. Pneumothorax was developed in 24 procedures. None of the parameters showed significant impact on the frequency of the pneumothorax. Overall haemorrhage occurred in 43 procedures. The incidence of overall haemorrhage was higher in patients with smaller lesions, longer pleural distance and pleural abutted lesions (p<0.05). Differences in visibility at projection radiographs were statistically significant between patients with or without perilesional haemorrhage (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: Transthoracic fine-needle aspiration biopsy using a C-arm CBCT system is feasible for imaging guidance of lung lesion and early detection of the procedural-related complications.
Authors: Kwang Nam Jin; Chang Min Park; Jin Mo Goo; Hyun Ju Lee; Youkyung Lee; Jung Im Kim; So Young Choi; Hyo-Cheol Kim Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2010-09 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Michael J Wallace; Michael D Kuo; Craig Glaiberman; Christoph A Binkert; Robert C Orth; Gilles Soulez Journal: J Vasc Interv Radiol Date: 2008-04-10 Impact factor: 3.464
Authors: J P Ko; J O Shepard; E A Drucker; S L Aquino; A Sharma; B Sabloff; E Halpern; T C McLoud Journal: Radiology Date: 2001-02 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Christoph M Heyer; Stefanie Reichelt; Soeren A Peters; Joerg W Walther; Klaus-Michael Müller; Volkmar Nicolas Journal: Acad Radiol Date: 2008-08 Impact factor: 3.173
Authors: Hamid Pahlevaninezhad; Anthony M D Lee; Alexander Ritchie; Tawimas Shaipanich; Wei Zhang; Diana N Ionescu; Geoffrey Hohert; Calum MacAulay; Stephen Lam; Pierre Lane Journal: Biomed Opt Express Date: 2015-09-30 Impact factor: 3.732
Authors: W M H Busser; S J Braak; J J Fütterer; M J L van Strijen; Y L Hoogeveen; F de Lange; L J Schultze Kool Journal: Br J Radiol Date: 2013-08-02 Impact factor: 3.039
Authors: Simon Veldhoen; Maximilian Schöllchen; H Hanken; C Precht; F O Henes; G Schön; H D Nagel; U Schumacher; M Heiland; G Adam; M Regier Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2016-05-11 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: De Chao Jiao; Teng Fei Li; Xin Wei Han; Gang Wu; Ji Ma; Ming Ti Fu; Qi Sun; Janina Beilner Journal: Diagn Interv Radiol Date: 2014-11 Impact factor: 2.630