Literature DB >> 22002584

Reduction of the unnecessary dose from the over-range area with a spiral dynamic z-collimator: comparison of beam pitch and detector coverage with 128-detector row CT.

Takashi Shirasaka1, Yoshinori Funama, Mutsukazu Hayashi, Shinichi Awamoto, Masatoshi Kondo, Yasuhiko Nakamura, Masamitsu Hatakenaka, Hiroshi Honda.   

Abstract

Our purpose in this study was to assess the radiation dose reduction and the actual exposed scan length of over-range areas using a spiral dynamic z-collimator at different beam pitches and detector coverage. Using glass rod dosimeters, we measured the unilateral over-range scan dose between the beginning of the planned scan range and the beginning of the actual exposed scan range. Scanning was performed at detector coverage of 80.0 and 40.0 mm, with and without the spiral dynamic z-collimator. The dose-saving ratio was calculated as the ratio of the unnecessary over-range dose, with and without the spiral dynamic z-collimator. In 80.0 mm detector coverage without the spiral dynamic z-collimator, the actual exposed scan length for the over-range area was 108, 120, and 126 mm, corresponding to a beam pitch of 0.60, 0.80, and 0.99, respectively. With the spiral dynamic z-collimator, the actual exposed scan length for the over-range area was 48, 66, and 84 mm with a beam pitch of 0.60, 0.80, and 0.99, respectively. The dose-saving ratios with and without the spiral dynamic z-collimator for a beam pitch of 0.60, 0.80, and 0.99 were 35.07, 24.76, and 13.51%, respectively. With 40.0 mm detector coverage, the dose-saving ratios with and without the spiral dynamic z-collimator had the highest value of 27.23% with a low beam pitch of 0.60. The spiral dynamic z-collimator is important for a reduction in the unnecessary over-range dose and makes it possible to reduce the unnecessary dose by means of a lower beam pitch.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22002584     DOI: 10.1007/s12194-011-0135-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol        ISSN: 1865-0333


  20 in total

1.  Dose and pitch relationship for a particular multislice CT scanner.

Authors:  M Mahesh; J C Scatarige; J Cooper; E K Fishman
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 3.959

2.  Hepatic arteries in potential donors for living related liver transplantation: evaluation with multi-detector row CT angiography.

Authors:  Seung Soo Lee; Tae Kyoung Kim; Jae Ho Byun; Hyun Kwon Ha; Pyo Nyun Kim; Ah Young Kim; Sung Gyu Lee; Moon-Gyu Lee
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2003-04-03       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Potential living liver donors: evaluation with an all-in-one protocol with multi-detector row CT.

Authors:  Tobias Schroeder; Silvio Nadalin; Jörg Stattaus; Jörg F Debatin; Massimo Malagó; Stefan G Ruehm
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Primary radiation outside the imaged volume of a multislice helical CT scan.

Authors:  R Nicholson; S Fetherston
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 3.039

5.  The effect of z overscanning on patient effective dose from multidetector helical computed tomography examinations.

Authors:  A Tzedakis; J Damilakis; K Perisinakis; J Stratakis; N Gourtsoyiannis
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Radiation dose reduction to the male gonads during MDCT: the effectiveness of a lead shield.

Authors:  Christian Hohl; Andreas H Mahnken; Ernst Klotz; Marco Das; Achim Stargardt; Georg Mühlenbruch; Thorsten Schmidt; Rolf W Günther; Joachim E Wildberger
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 3.959

7.  Artifacts in CT: recognition and avoidance.

Authors:  Julia F Barrett; Nicholas Keat
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2004 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.333

8.  Aortic and hepatic enhancement and tumor-to-liver contrast: analysis of the effect of different concentrations of contrast material at multi-detector row helical CT.

Authors:  Kazuo Awai; Koichi Takada; Hiromitsu Onishi; Shinichi Hori
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Timing of parenchymal enhancement on dual-phase dynamic helical CT of the liver: how long does the hepatic arterial phase predominate?

Authors:  M G Frederick; B L McElaney; A Singer; K S Park; E K Paulson; S G McGee; R C Nelson
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 3.959

10.  Effect of contrast material injection duration and rate on aortic peak time and peak enhancement at dynamic CT involving injection protocol with dose tailored to patient weight.

Authors:  Kazuo Awai; Kumiko Hiraishi; Shinichi Hori
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 11.105

View more
  2 in total

1.  Evaluation of an adaptive detector collimation for prospectively ECG-triggered coronary CT angiography with third-generation dual-source CT.

Authors:  Michael Messerli; Patricia Dewes; Jan-Erik Scholtz; Christophe Arendt; Simon Wildermuth; Thomas J Vogl; Ralf W Bauer
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-12-07       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Efficacy of a dynamic collimator for overranging dose reduction in a second- and third-generation dual source CT scanner.

Authors:  Ronald Booij; Marcel L Dijkshoorn; Marcel van Straten
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-01-26       Impact factor: 5.315

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.