Literature DB >> 16013721

The effect of z overscanning on patient effective dose from multidetector helical computed tomography examinations.

A Tzedakis1, J Damilakis, K Perisinakis, J Stratakis, N Gourtsoyiannis.   

Abstract

z overscanning in multidetector (MD) helical CT scanning is prerequisite for the interpolation of acquired data required during image reconstruction and refers to the exposure of tissues beyond the boundaries of the volume to be imaged. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effect of z overscanning on the patient effective dose from helical MD CT examinations. The Monte Carlo N-particle radiation transport code was employed in the current study to simulate CT exposure. The validity of the Monte Carlo simulation was verified by (a) a comparison of calculated and measured standard computed tomography dose index (CTDI) dosimetric data, and (b) a comparison of calculated and measured dose profiles along the z axis. CTDI was measured using a pencil ionization chamber and head and body CT phantoms. Dose profiles along the z axis were obtained using thermoluminescence dosimeters. A commercially available mathematical anthropomorphic phantom was used for the estimation of effective doses from four standard CT examinations, i.e., head and neck, chest, abdomen and pelvis, and trunk studies. Data for both axial and helical modes of operation were obtained. In the helical mode, z overscanning was taken into account. The calculated effective dose from a CT exposure was normalized to CTDI(free in air). The percentage differences in the normalized effective dose between contiguous axial and helical scans with pitch = 1, may reach 13.1%, 35.8%, 29.0%, and 21.5%, for head and neck, chest, abdomen and pelvis, and trunk studies, respectively. Given that the same kilovoltage and tube load per rotation were used in both axial and helical scans, the above differences may be attributed to z overscanning. For helical scans with pitch = 1, broader beam collimation is associated with increased z overscanning and consequently higher normalized effective dose value, when other scanning parameters are held constant. For a given beam collimation, the selection of a higher value of reconstructed image slice width increases the normalized effective dose. In conclusion, z overscanning may significantly affect the patient effective dose from CT examinations performed on MD CT scanners. Therefore, an estimation of the patient effective dose from MD helical CT examinations should always take into consideration the effect of z overscanning.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16013721     DOI: 10.1118/1.1924309

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  34 in total

Review 1.  Imaging of advanced renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Ullrich G Mueller-Lisse; Ulrike L Mueller-Lisse
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2010-05-11       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  Reduction of the unnecessary dose from the over-range area with a spiral dynamic z-collimator: comparison of beam pitch and detector coverage with 128-detector row CT.

Authors:  Takashi Shirasaka; Yoshinori Funama; Mutsukazu Hayashi; Shinichi Awamoto; Masatoshi Kondo; Yasuhiko Nakamura; Masamitsu Hatakenaka; Hiroshi Honda
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2011-10-15

3.  The feasibility of a scanner-independent technique to estimate organ dose from MDCT scans: using CTDIvol to account for differences between scanners.

Authors:  Adam C Turner; Maria Zankl; John J DeMarco; Chris H Cagnon; Di Zhang; Erin Angel; Dianna D Cody; Donna M Stevens; Cynthia H McCollough; Michael F McNitt-Gray
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Image quality and radiation exposure in 320-row temporal bone computed tomography.

Authors:  H C Bauknecht; E Siebert; A Dannenberg; G Bohner; C Jach; S Diekmann; C Scheurig; R Klingebiel
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 2.419

5.  Radiation dose reduction in computed tomography: techniques and future perspective.

Authors:  Lifeng Yu; Xin Liu; Shuai Leng; James M Kofler; Juan C Ramirez-Giraldo; Mingliang Qu; Jodie Christner; Joel G Fletcher; Cynthia H McCollough
Journal:  Imaging Med       Date:  2009-10

6.  Quantitative assessment of selective in-plane shielding of tissues in computed tomography through evaluation of absorbed dose and image quality.

Authors:  J Geleijns; M Salvadó Artells; W J H Veldkamp; M López Tortosa; A Calzado Cantera
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-04-08       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Dose reduction in multidetector CT of the urinary tract. Studies in a phantom model.

Authors:  E Coppenrath; T Meindl; P Herzog; R Khalil; U Mueller-Lisse; L Krenn; M Reiser; U G Mueller-Lisse
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-03-28       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  Effective radiation doses in CT colonography: results of an inventory among research institutions.

Authors:  Sebastiaan Jensch; Rogier E van Gelder; Henk W Venema; Johannes B Reitsma; Patrick M M Bossuyt; Johan S Laméris; Jaap Stoker
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-01-18       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  Validation of a Monte Carlo tool for patient-specific dose simulations in multi-slice computed tomography.

Authors:  Paul Deak; Marcel van Straten; Paul C Shrimpton; Maria Zankl; Willi A Kalender
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2007-12-08       Impact factor: 5.315

10.  Evaluation of an adaptive detector collimation for prospectively ECG-triggered coronary CT angiography with third-generation dual-source CT.

Authors:  Michael Messerli; Patricia Dewes; Jan-Erik Scholtz; Christophe Arendt; Simon Wildermuth; Thomas J Vogl; Ralf W Bauer
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-12-07       Impact factor: 5.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.