Literature DB >> 22002301

Extended sagittal saw cut significantly reduces fracture load in cementless unicompartmental knee arthroplasty compared to cemented tibia plateaus: an experimental cadaver study.

J B Seeger1, D Haas, S Jäger, E Röhner, S Tohtz, M Clarius.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Periprosthetic tibial plateau fractures represent a rare but serious complication in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty and are associated with extended sagittal tibial bone cuts. These can occur during the surgery, weaken the posterior cortex of the tibia and are associated with periprosthetic tibial plateau fractures. Although excellent long-term results have been reported with cemented unicompartmental knee arthroplasty, there is high interest in cementless fixation. The aim of the study was to compare fracture loads of cementless and cemented unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.
METHODS: Tibial components of the Oxford Uni were implanted in six paired fresh-frozen tibiae with a defined extended saw cut (10°) at the dorsal cortex of each specimen. In one set, surgery was performed with cement fixation, and in the other, cementless components were implanted. Vertical loads were then applied under standardised conditions to fracture the specimens.
RESULTS: Median loads of 3.7 (0.7-6.9) kN led to fractures in the cemented group, whereas cementless fixated tibiae fractured with a median load of 1.6 (0.2-4.3) kN (P = 0.02).
CONCLUSION: The loading capacity in tibiae with cementless components is significantly less compared to cemented fixation. The results show that in case of an extended sagittal bone cut patients especially those with poor bone quality who are treated with a cementless unicompartmental knee arthroplasty are at higher risk for periprosthetic tibial fractures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22002301     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-011-1698-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  21 in total

1.  Oxford medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. A survival analysis of an independent series.

Authors:  U C Svärd; A J Price
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2001-03

2.  [Medial unicompartmental knee replacement using the "Oxford Uni" meniscal bearing knee].

Authors:  P R Aldinger; M Clarius; D W Murray; J W Goodfellow; S J Breusch
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 1.087

3.  [Periprosthetic fractures in older patients].

Authors:  Marc Thomsen; Eike Jakubowitz; Jörn Seeger; Christoph Lee; Michael Clarius
Journal:  Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb       Date:  2006 Sep-Oct

4.  Yearly incidence of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in the United States.

Authors:  Daniel L Riddle; William A Jiranek; Fred J McGlynn
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2007-11-26       Impact factor: 4.757

5.  Saw cuts in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: an analysis of Sawbone preparations.

Authors:  Michael Clarius; Peter R Aldinger; Thomas Bruckner; Joern B Seeger
Journal:  Knee       Date:  2009-02-04       Impact factor: 2.199

6.  Primary stability of tibial components in TKA: in vitro comparison of two cementing techniques.

Authors:  Adrian Skwara; J Figiel; T Knott; J R J Paletta; S Fuchs-Winkelmann; C O Tibesku
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2009-07-02       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Minimally invasive unicompartmental knee replacement: retrospective clinical and radiographic evaluation of 83 patients.

Authors:  Danilo Bruni; Francesco Iacono; Alessandro Russo; Stefano Zaffagnini; Giulio Maria Marcheggiani Muccioli; Simone Bignozzi; Laura Bragonzoni; Maurilio Marcacci
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2009-09-18       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  Effects of postmortem storage by freezing on ligament tensile behavior.

Authors:  S L Woo; C A Orlando; J F Camp; W H Akeson
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 2.712

9.  Medial tibial plateau fracture complicating unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Grzegorz Rudol; Mark P Jackson; Stephen E James
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2006-04-17       Impact factor: 4.757

10.  Results of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty at a minimum of ten years of follow-up.

Authors:  Richard A Berger; R Michael Meneghini; Joshua J Jacobs; Mitchell B Sheinkop; Craig J Della Valle; Aaron G Rosenberg; Jorge O Galante
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 5.284

View more
  15 in total

Review 1.  Periprosthetic fractures: concepts of biomechanical in vitro investigations.

Authors:  Eike Jakubowitz; Jörn Bengt Seeger
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-08-21       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 2.  [Revision after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty].

Authors:  G Mohr; J Martin; M Clarius
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 3.  Cementless fixation in medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a systematic review.

Authors:  S Campi; H G Pandit; C A F Dodd; D W Murray
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-07-19       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Impact of keel saw blade design and thickness on the incidence of tibial plateau fracture and tibial implant-loosening in cementless medial UKR.

Authors:  Lena Keppler; Steffen Klingbeil; Alexander Martin Keppler; Johannes Becker; Christian Fulghum; Björn Michel; Kilian Voigts; Wolfgang Reng
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-06-21       Impact factor: 2.562

Review 5.  [Modern unicondylar knee arthroplasty. Tips and tricks].

Authors:  F von Knoch; U Munzinger
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 1.087

6.  Five-year experience of cementless Oxford unicompartmental knee replacement.

Authors:  H G Pandit; S Campi; T W Hamilton; O D Dada; S Pollalis; C Jenkins; C A F Dodd; D W Murray
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-11-26       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Regional five-year clinical outcomes of 289 consecutive cementless oxford uni-compartmental knee replacements at a non-inventor centre.

Authors:  R Nandra; H D Rajgor; C Winkworth; N Aslam
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2021-03-20

8.  Cemented versus Uncemented Oxford Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty: Is There a Difference?

Authors:  Burak Akan; Dogac Karaguven; Berk Guclu; Tugrul Yildirim; Alper Kaya; Mehmet Armangil; Ilker Cetin
Journal:  Adv Orthop       Date:  2013-12-09

9.  Valgus subsidence of the tibial component in cementless Oxford unicompartmental knee replacement.

Authors:  A D Liddle; H G Pandit; C Jenkins; P Lobenhoffer; W F M Jackson; C A F Dodd; D W Murray
Journal:  Bone Joint J       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 5.082

10.  Cementless unicompartmental knee replacement allows early return to normal activity.

Authors:  Benjamin Panzram; Ines Bertlich; Tobias Reiner; Tilman Walker; Sébastien Hagmann; Tobias Gotterbarm
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2018-01-17       Impact factor: 2.362

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.