Literature DB >> 15866962

Results of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty at a minimum of ten years of follow-up.

Richard A Berger1, R Michael Meneghini, Joshua J Jacobs, Mitchell B Sheinkop, Craig J Della Valle, Aaron G Rosenberg, Jorge O Galante.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There is a renewed interest in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. The present report describes the minimum ten-year results associated with a unicompartmental knee arthroplasty design that is in current use.
METHODS: Sixty-two consecutive unicompartmental knee arthroplasties that were performed with cemented modular Miller-Galante implants in fifty-one patients were studied prospectively both clinically and radiographically. All patients had isolated unicompartmental disease without patellofemoral symptoms. No patient was lost to follow-up. Thirteen patients (thirteen knees) died after less than ten years of follow-up, leaving thirty-eight patients (forty-nine knees) with a minimum of ten years of follow-up. The average duration of follow-up was twelve years.
RESULTS: The mean Hospital for Special Surgery knee score improved from 55 points preoperatively to 92 points at the time of the final follow-up. Thirty-nine knees (80%) had an excellent result, six (12%) had a good result, and four (8%) had a fair result. At the time of the final follow-up, thirty-nine knees (80%) had flexion to at least 120 degrees . Two patients (two knees) with well-fixed components underwent revision to total knee arthroplasty, at seven and eleven years, because of progression of patellofemoral arthritis. At the time of the final follow-up, no component was loose radiographically and there was no evidence of periprosthetic osteolysis. Radiographic evidence of progressive loss of joint space was observed in the opposite compartment of nine knees (18%) and in the patellofemoral space of seven knees (14%). Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed a survival rate of 98.0% +/- 2.0% at ten years and of 95.7% +/- 4.3% at thirteen years, with revision or radiographic loosening as the end point. The survival rate was 100% at thirteen years with aseptic loosening as the end point.
CONCLUSIONS: After a minimum duration of follow-up of ten years, this cemented modular unicompartmental knee design was associated with excellent clinical and radiographic results. Although the ten-year survival rate was excellent, radiographic signs of progression of osteoarthritis in the other compartments continued at a slow rate. With appropriate indications and technique, this unicompartmental knee design can yield excellent results into the beginning of the second decade of use.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15866962     DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.C.00568

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  78 in total

1.  Influence of bi- and tri-compartmental knee arthroplasty on the kinematics of the knee joint.

Authors:  Markus Wünschel; Jiahsuan Lo; Torsten Dilger; Nikolaus Wülker; Otto Müller
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2011-01-27       Impact factor: 2.362

2.  Is the medial wall of the intercondylar notch useful for tibial rotational reference in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty?

Authors:  Shinya Kawahara; Shuichi Matsuda; Ken Okazaki; Yasutaka Tashiro; Yukihide Iwamoto
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-10-21       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Early migration of the cemented tibial component of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a radiostereometry study.

Authors:  Andrea Ensini; Paolo Barbadoro; Alberto Leardini; Fabio Catani; Sandro Giannini
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-06-04       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  [The bicompartmental knee joint prosthesis Journey Deuce: failure analysis and optimization strategies].

Authors:  M Müller; G Matziolis; R Falk; H Hommel
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 1.087

5.  Tibial baseplate positioning in robotic-assisted and conventional unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Katherine P MacCallum; Jonathan R Danoff; Jeffrey A Geller
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2015-10-06

6.  Extended sagittal saw cut significantly reduces fracture load in cementless unicompartmental knee arthroplasty compared to cemented tibia plateaus: an experimental cadaver study.

Authors:  J B Seeger; D Haas; S Jäger; E Röhner; S Tohtz; M Clarius
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-10-15       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  The clinical outcome of revision knee replacement after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty versus primary total knee arthroplasty: 8-17 years follow-up study of 49 patients.

Authors:  Jaakko Järvenpää; Jukka Kettunen; Hannu Miettinen; Heikki Kröger
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2009-05-27       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  Proximal tibial bone density is preserved after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Bradley I Richmond; Simon V Hadlow; Tim G Lynskey; Cameron G Walker; Jacob T Munro
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-01-17       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 9.  [Modern unicondylar knee arthroplasty. Tips and tricks].

Authors:  F von Knoch; U Munzinger
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 1.087

10.  Does knee replacement surgery for osteoarthritis improve survival? The jury is still out.

Authors:  Devyani Misra; Na Lu; David Felson; Hyon K Choi; John Seeger; Thomas Einhorn; Tuhina Neogi; Yuqing Zhang
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2016-05-17       Impact factor: 19.103

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.