Literature DB >> 15480545

[Medial unicompartmental knee replacement using the "Oxford Uni" meniscal bearing knee].

P R Aldinger1, M Clarius, D W Murray, J W Goodfellow, S J Breusch.   

Abstract

Medial unicompartmental knee replacement (UKR) has many advantages over total replacement (TKR) including better function and reduced morbidity. However, the long-term failure rates of fixed-bearing UKR are high, especially because of polyethylene wear. The fully congruent mobile bearing of the Oxford UKR exhibits minimal polyethylene wear, failure from this cause does not seem to occur before 10 years. The instrumentation allows precise implantation to restore isometric function of the ligaments. During its 20 years development, the limits of usefulness of the implant have been established and found to include about one in four knees requiring replacement for osteoarthritis. In an independent series, using these criteria, the 15 year survival was 94%. Since 1998, the phase 3 implant has been used with modified instruments through a small incision, avoiding damage to the extensor mechanism. Patients now recover about three times faster than after TKR, and regain much better flexion (mean 135 degrees ). The current evidence supports that the minimally invasive Oxford UKR should be seriously considered as primary treatment for anteromedial compartment osteoarthritis-provided the appropriate surgical expertise is available.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15480545     DOI: 10.1007/s00132-004-0712-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthopade        ISSN: 0085-4530            Impact factor:   1.087


  16 in total

1.  Oxford medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. A survival analysis of an independent series.

Authors:  U C Svärd; A J Price
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2001-03

2.  Rapid recovery after oxford unicompartmental arthroplasty through a short incision.

Authors:  A J Price; J Webb; H Topf; C A Dodd; J W Goodfellow; D W Murray
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 4.757

3.  The anterior cruciate ligament in knee arthroplasty. A risk-factor with unconstrained meniscal prostheses.

Authors:  J Goodfellow; J O'Connor
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Polyethylene wear in meniscal knee replacement. A one to nine-year retrieval analysis of the Oxford knee.

Authors:  J N Argenson; J J O'Connor
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1992-03

5.  Anteromedial osteoarthritis of the knee.

Authors:  S H White; P F Ludkowski; J W Goodfellow
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1991-07

6.  Unicompartmental or total knee replacement? Five-year results of a prospective, randomised trial of 102 osteoarthritic knees with unicompartmental arthritis.

Authors:  J H Newman; C E Ackroyd; N A Shah
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1998-09

7.  Stress radiography in degenerative arthritis of the knee.

Authors:  P H Gibson; J W Goodfellow
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1986-08

8.  Oxford meniscal bearing knee versus the Marmor knee in unicompartmental arthroplasty for arthrosis. A Swedish multicenter survival study.

Authors:  S Lewold; S Goodman; K Knutson; O Robertsson; L Lidgren
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 4.757

9.  Accelerated recovery for unicompartmental knee replacement--a feasibility study.

Authors:  D J Beard; D W Murray; J L Rees; A J Price; C A F Dodd
Journal:  Knee       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 2.199

10.  A comparison of tricompartmental and unicompartmental arthroplasty for the treatment of gonarthrosis.

Authors:  B T Rougraff; D A Heck; A E Gibson
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 4.176

View more
  15 in total

1.  [The bicompartmental knee joint prosthesis Journey Deuce: failure analysis and optimization strategies].

Authors:  M Müller; G Matziolis; R Falk; H Hommel
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 1.087

2.  Extended sagittal saw cut significantly reduces fracture load in cementless unicompartmental knee arthroplasty compared to cemented tibia plateaus: an experimental cadaver study.

Authors:  J B Seeger; D Haas; S Jäger; E Röhner; S Tohtz; M Clarius
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-10-15       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  [Minimally invasive implantation in unicondylar arthroplasty].

Authors:  R Hube; M Keim
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 1.087

4.  Free bone cement fragments after minimally invasive unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: an underappreciated problem.

Authors:  S M Hauptmann; P Weber; C Glaser; C Birkenmaier; V Jansson; P E Müller
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2008-05-31       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Correlation of positioning and clinical results in Oxford UKA.

Authors:  Michael Clarius; Christian Hauck; Joern B Seeger; Maria Pritsch; Christian Merle; Peter R Aldinger
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2009-10-09       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Improved accuracy in computer-assisted unicondylar knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Patrick Weber; Alexander Crispin; Florian Schmidutz; Sandra Utzschneider; Matthias F Pietschmann; Volkmar Jansson; Peter E Müller
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-01-23       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  The influence of third-body particles on wear rate in unicondylar knee arthroplasty: a wear simulator study with bone and cement debris.

Authors:  Christian Schroeder; Thomas M Grupp; Bernhard Fritz; Christoph Schilling; Yan Chevalier; Sandra Utzschneider; Volkmar Jansson
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2013-02-17       Impact factor: 3.896

8.  [Unicompartimental joint (Oxford III) with mobile bearing : Minimally invasive implantation of a in the medial compartiment].

Authors:  W Petersen; S Metzlaff; P Forkel; A Achtnich; K Schmoranzer; P Hertel
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 1.154

9.  Sports activities before and after medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty using the new Heidelberg Sports Activity Score.

Authors:  Alexander Jahnke; Johannes Karl Mende; Gerrit Steffen Maier; Gafar Adam Ahmed; Bernd Alexander Ishaque; Holger Schmitt; Markus Rickert; Michael Clarius; Jörn Bengt Seeger
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-09-26       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 10.  [Experiences with lateral unicondylar prostheses].

Authors:  P R Aldinger; T Walker; T Gotterbarm
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 1.087

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.