Literature DB >> 21969662

Quality initiatives: CT radiation dose reduction: how to implement change without sacrificing diagnostic quality.

Eric P Tamm1, X John Rong, Dianna D Cody, Randy D Ernst, Nancy E Fitzgerald, Vikas Kundra.   

Abstract

The risks and benefits of using computed tomography (CT) as opposed to another imaging modality to accomplish a particular clinical goal should be weighed carefully. To accurately assess radiation risks and keep radiation doses as low as reasonably achievable, radiologists must be knowledgeable about the doses delivered during various types of CT studies performed at their institutions. The authors of this article propose a process improvement approach that includes the estimation of effective radiation dose levels, formulation of dose reduction goals, modification of acquisition protocols, assessment of effects on image quality, and implementation of changes necessary to ensure quality. A first step toward developing informed radiation dose reduction goals is to become familiar with the radiation dose values and radiation-associated health risks reported in the literature. Next, to determine the baseline dose values for a CT study at a particular institution, dose data can be collected from the CT scanners, interpreted, tabulated, and graphed. CT protocols can be modified to reduce overall effective dose by using techniques such as automated exposure control and iterative reconstruction, as well as by decreasing the number of scanning phases, increasing the section thickness, and adjusting the peak voltage (kVp setting), tube current-time product (milliampere-seconds), and pitch. Last, PDSA (plan, do, study, act) cycles can be established to detect and minimize negative effects of dose reduction methods on image quality.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21969662     DOI: 10.1148/rg.317115027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiographics        ISSN: 0271-5333            Impact factor:   5.333


  28 in total

1.  Short- and long-term effects of clinical audits on compliance with procedures in CT scanning.

Authors:  Antonio Oliveri; Nigel Howarth; Pierre Alain Gevenois; Denis Tack
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-11-14       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Comparison of iterative model, hybrid iterative, and filtered back projection reconstruction techniques in low-dose brain CT: impact of thin-slice imaging.

Authors:  Takeshi Nakaura; Yuji Iyama; Masafumi Kidoh; Koichi Yokoyama; Seitaro Oda; Shinichi Tokuyasu; Kazunori Harada; Yasuyuki Yamashita
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2015-12-29       Impact factor: 2.804

3.  Optimizing radiation dose by using advanced modelled iterative reconstruction in high-pitch coronary CT angiography.

Authors:  Sonja Gordic; Lotus Desbiolles; Martin Sedlmair; Robert Manka; André Plass; Bernhard Schmidt; Daniela B Husarik; Francesco Maisano; Simon Wildermuth; Hatem Alkadhi; Sebastian Leschka
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-06-03       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Normalizing Heterogeneous Medical Imaging Data to Measure the Impact of Radiation Dose.

Authors:  Luís A Bastião Silva; Luís S Ribeiro; Milton Santos; Nuno Neves; Dulce Francisco; Carlos Costa; José Luis Oliveira
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 4.056

5.  Multidetector CT and three-dimensional CT angiography of upper extremity arterial injury.

Authors:  Jan Fritz; David T Efron; Elliot K Fishman
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2014-12-11

6.  "Hyperdense artery sign" in early ischemic stroke: diagnostic value of model-based reconstruction approach in comparison with standard hybrid iterative reconstruction algorithm.

Authors:  Sophie Lombardi; Luca Riva; Mirko Patassini; Paolo Remida; Cristina Capraro; Francesco Canonico; Cammillo Talei Franzesi; Davide Ippolito
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2018-09-08       Impact factor: 2.804

7.  Computed tomography of the cervical spine: comparison of image quality between a standard-dose and a low-dose protocol using filtered back-projection and iterative reconstruction.

Authors:  Fabio Becce; Yosr Ben Salah; Francis R Verdun; Bruno C Vande Berg; Frederic E Lecouvet; Reto Meuli; Patrick Omoumi
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2013-01-29       Impact factor: 2.199

8.  Can a revised paediatric radiation dose reduction CT protocol be applied and still maintain anatomical delineation, diagnostic confidence and overall imaging quality?

Authors:  S Kritsaneepaiboon; P Siriwanarangsun; P Tanaanantarak; A Krisanachinda
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2014-06-24       Impact factor: 3.039

9.  Optimizing CT radiation dose based on patient size and image quality: the size-specific dose estimate method.

Authors:  David B Larson
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2014-10-11

10.  Optimization of computed tomography (CT) arthrography of hip for the visualization of cartilage: an in vitro study.

Authors:  Paolo Simoni; Pierre-Philippe Leyder; Adelin Albert; Françoise Malchair; Carole Maréchal; Laura Scarciolla; Bruno Beomonte Zobel; Victoria Alvarez Miezentseva; Philippe Gillet
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2013-11-27       Impact factor: 2.199

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.