Literature DB >> 25304711

Optimizing CT radiation dose based on patient size and image quality: the size-specific dose estimate method.

David B Larson1.   

Abstract

The principle of ALARA (dose as low as reasonably achievable) calls for dose optimization rather than dose reduction, per se. Optimization of CT radiation dose is accomplished by producing images of acceptable diagnostic image quality using the lowest dose method available. Because it is image quality that constrains the dose, CT dose optimization is primarily a problem of image quality rather than radiation dose. Therefore, the primary focus in CT radiation dose optimization should be on image quality. However, no reliable direct measure of image quality has been developed for routine clinical practice. Until such measures become available, size-specific dose estimates (SSDE) can be used as a reasonable image-quality estimate. The SSDE method of radiation dose optimization for CT abdomen and pelvis consists of plotting SSDE for a sample of examinations as a function of patient size, establishing an SSDE threshold curve based on radiologists' assessment of image quality, and modifying protocols to consistently produce doses that are slightly above the threshold SSDE curve. Challenges in operationalizing CT radiation dose optimization include data gathering and monitoring, managing the complexities of the numerous protocols, scanners and operators, and understanding the relationship of the automated tube current modulation (ATCM) parameters to image quality. Because CT manufacturers currently maintain their ATCM algorithms as secret for proprietary reasons, prospective modeling of SSDE for patient populations is not possible without reverse engineering the ATCM algorithm and, hence, optimization by this method requires a trial-and-error approach.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25304711     DOI: 10.1007/s00247-014-3077-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Radiol        ISSN: 0301-0449


  15 in total

Review 1.  X-ray imaging physics for nuclear medicine technologists. Part 1: Basic principles of x-ray production.

Authors:  J Anthony Seibert
Journal:  J Nucl Med Technol       Date:  2004-09

2.  Quality initiatives: CT radiation dose reduction: how to implement change without sacrificing diagnostic quality.

Authors:  Eric P Tamm; X John Rong; Dianna D Cody; Randy D Ernst; Nancy E Fitzgerald; Vikas Kundra
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2011-10-03       Impact factor: 5.333

3.  Dose optimization in pediatric CT: current technology and future innovations.

Authors:  Christoph Suess; Xiaoyan Chen
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2002-08-29

Review 4.  CT dosimetry: comparison of measurement techniques and devices.

Authors:  John A Bauhs; Thomas J Vrieze; Andrew N Primak; Michael R Bruesewitz; Cynthia H McCollough
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2008 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.333

5.  Comparison of different body size parameters for individual dose adaptation in body CT of adults.

Authors:  Jan Menke
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  A prospective evaluation of dose reduction and image quality in chest CT using adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction.

Authors:  Jonathon Leipsic; Giang Nguyen; Jaqueline Brown; Don Sin; John R Mayo
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 7.  Strategies for CT radiation dose optimization.

Authors:  Mannudeep K Kalra; Michael M Maher; Thomas L Toth; Leena M Hamberg; Michael A Blake; Jo-Anne Shepard; Sanjay Saini
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2004-01-22       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 8.  Strategies for reducing radiation dose in CT.

Authors:  Cynthia H McCollough; Andrew N Primak; Natalie Braun; James Kofler; Lifeng Yu; Jodie Christner
Journal:  Radiol Clin North Am       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 2.303

9.  System for verifiable CT radiation dose optimization based on image quality. part I. Optimization model.

Authors:  David B Larson; Lily L Wang; Daniel J Podberesky; Marilyn J Goske
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2013-06-19       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  System for verifiable CT radiation dose optimization based on image quality. part II. process control system.

Authors:  David B Larson; Remo J Malarik; Seth M Hall; Daniel J Podberesky
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2013-06-19       Impact factor: 11.105

View more
  6 in total

1.  Size-based quality-informed framework for quantitative optimization of pediatric CT.

Authors:  Ehsan Samei; Xiang Li; Donald P Frush
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2017-08-21

2.  Radiation intensity (CTDIvol) and visibility of anatomical structures in head CT examinations.

Authors:  Sameer Tipnis; Rajesh Thampy; Zoran Rumboldt; Maria Spampinato; Gisele Matheus; Walter Huda
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2016-01-08       Impact factor: 2.102

3.  Can Patient's Body Weight Represent Body Diameter for Pediatric Size-Specific Dose Estimate in Thoracic and Abdominal Computed Tomography?

Authors:  Supika Kritsaneepaiboon; Suwadee Eng-Chuan; Saowapark Yoykaew
Journal:  J Clin Imaging Sci       Date:  2019-05-24

4.  An Improved Method of Automated Noise Measurement System in CT Images.

Authors:  Choirul Anam; Idam Arif; Freddy Haryanto; Fauzia P Lestari; Rena Widita; Wahyu S Budi; Heri Sutanto; Kusworo Adi; Toshioh Fujibuchi; Geoff Dougherty
Journal:  J Biomed Phys Eng       Date:  2021-04-01

5.  Real-time fully automated dosimetric computation for CT images in the clinical workflow: A feasibility study.

Authors:  Massimiliano Porzio; Choirul Anam
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-08-11       Impact factor: 5.738

6.  Comparison of central, peripheral, and weighted size-specific dose in CT.

Authors:  Choirul Anam; Dwi Adhianto; Heri Sutanto; Kusworo Adi; Mohd Hanafi Ali; William Ian Duncombe Rae; Toshioh Fujibuchi; Geoff Dougherty
Journal:  J Xray Sci Technol       Date:  2020       Impact factor: 1.535

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.