Literature DB >> 17141751

Effects of prosodically modulated sub-phonetic variation on lexical competition.

Anne Pier Salverda1, Delphine Dahan, Michael K Tanenhaus, Katherine Crosswhite, Mikhail Masharov, Joyce McDonough.   

Abstract

Eye movements were monitored as participants followed spoken instructions to manipulate one of four objects pictured on a computer screen. Target words occurred in utterance-medial (e.g., Put the cap next to the square) or utterance-final position (e.g., Now click on the cap). Displays consisted of the target picture (e.g., a cap), a monosyllabic competitor picture (e.g., a cat), a polysyllabic competitor picture (e.g., a captain) and a distractor (e.g., a beaker). The relative proportion of fixations to the two types of competitor pictures changed as a function of the position of the target word in the utterance, demonstrating that lexical competition is modulated by prosodically conditioned phonetic variation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17141751      PMCID: PMC2435387          DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2006.10.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cognition        ISSN: 0010-0277


  15 in total

1.  Eye movements and lexical access in spoken-language comprehension: evaluating a linking hypothesis between fixations and linguistic processing.

Authors:  M K Tanenhaus; J S Magnuson; D Dahan; C Chambers
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2000-11

2.  Gradient effects of within-category phonetic variation on lexical access.

Authors:  Bob McMurray; Michael K Tanenhaus; Richard N Aslin
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2002-12

3.  The time course of spoken word learning and recognition: studies with artificial lexicons.

Authors:  James S Magnuson; Michael K Tanenhaus; Richard N Aslin; Delphine Dahan
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2003-06

4.  Segmental durations in the vicinity of prosodic phrase boundaries.

Authors:  C W Wightman; S Shattuck-Hufnagel; M Ostendorf; P J Price
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Linguistic uses of segmental duration in English: acoustic and perceptual evidence.

Authors:  D H Klatt
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1976-05       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  The TRACE model of speech perception.

Authors:  J L McClelland; J L Elman
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  The effect of position in utterance on speech segment duration in English.

Authors:  D K Oller
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1973-11       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  The effect of subphonetic differences on lexical access.

Authors:  J E Andruski; S E Blumstein; M Burton
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1994-09

9.  The articulatory kinematics of final lengthening.

Authors:  J Edwards; M E Beckman; J Fletcher
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Recognizing spoken words: the neighborhood activation model.

Authors:  P A Luce; D B Pisoni
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 3.570

View more
  25 in total

1.  Phonological Knowledge Guides Two-year-olds' and Adults' Interpretation of Salient Pitch Contours in Word Learning.

Authors:  Carolyn Quam; Daniel Swingley
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2010-02-01       Impact factor: 3.059

Review 2.  Language processing in the natural world.

Authors:  Michael K Tanenhaus; Sarah Brown-Schmidt
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2008-03-12       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  The Activation of Embedded Words in Spoken Word Recognition.

Authors:  Xujin Zhang; Arthur G Samuel
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2015 February-April       Impact factor: 3.059

4.  Cross-linguistic differences in the use of durational cues for the segmentation of a novel language.

Authors:  Mikhail Ordin; Leona Polyanskaya; Itziar Laka; Marina Nespor
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2017-07

5.  English Listeners Use Suprasegmental Cues to Lexical Stress Early During Spoken-Word Recognition.

Authors:  Alexandra Jesse; Katja Poellmann; Ying-Yee Kong
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2017-01-01       Impact factor: 2.297

6.  Low-frequency fine-structure cues allow for the online use of lexical stress during spoken-word recognition in spectrally degraded speech.

Authors:  Ying-Yee Kong; Alexandra Jesse
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Misleading Bias-Driven Expectations in Referential Processing and the Facilitative Role of Contrastive Accent.

Authors:  Inbal Itzhak; Shari R Baum
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2015-10

8.  Generalization to unfamiliar talkers in artificial language learning.

Authors:  Sara Finley
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2013-08

9.  Mechanisms of interaction in speech production.

Authors:  Melissa Baese-Berk; Matthew Goldrick
Journal:  Lang Cogn Process       Date:  2009-05-01

10.  Gradient sensitivity to within-category variation in words and syllables.

Authors:  Bob McMurray; Richard N Aslin; Michael K Tanenhaus; Michael J Spivey; Dana Subik
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 3.332

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.