Literature DB >> 28800370

The Effect of Dynamic Pitch on Speech Recognition in Temporally Modulated Noise.

Jing Shen1, Pamela E Souza1.   

Abstract

Purpose: This study investigated the effect of dynamic pitch in target speech on older and younger listeners' speech recognition in temporally modulated noise. First, we examined whether the benefit from dynamic-pitch cues depends on the temporal modulation of noise. Second, we tested whether older listeners can benefit from dynamic-pitch cues for speech recognition in noise. Last, we explored the individual factors that predict the amount of dynamic-pitch benefit for speech recognition in noise. Method: Younger listeners with normal hearing and older listeners with varying levels of hearing sensitivity participated in the study, in which speech reception thresholds were measured with sentences in nonspeech noise.
Results: The younger listeners benefited more from dynamic pitch for speech recognition in temporally modulated noise than unmodulated noise. Older listeners were able to benefit from the dynamic-pitch cues but received less benefit from noise modulation than the younger listeners. For those older listeners with hearing loss, the amount of hearing loss strongly predicted the dynamic-pitch benefit for speech recognition in noise. Conclusions: Dynamic-pitch cues aid speech recognition in noise, particularly when noise has temporal modulation. Hearing loss negatively affects the dynamic-pitch benefit to older listeners with significant hearing loss.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28800370      PMCID: PMC5831627          DOI: 10.1044/2017_JSLHR-H-16-0389

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res        ISSN: 1092-4388            Impact factor:   2.297


  56 in total

1.  Frequency and temporal resolution in elderly listeners with good and poor word recognition.

Authors:  S L Phillips; S Gordon-Salant; P J Fitzgibbons; G Yeni-Komshian
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 2.297

2.  Contributions of temporal encodings of voicing, voicelessness, fundamental frequency, and amplitude variation to audio-visual and auditory speech perception.

Authors:  A Faulkner; S Rosen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  The role of sequential stream segregation and frequency selectivity in the perception of simultaneous sentences by listeners with sensorineural hearing loss.

Authors:  C L Mackersie; T L Prida; D Stiles
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 2.297

4.  Brain potentials indicate immediate use of prosodic cues in natural speech processing.

Authors:  K Steinhauer; K Alter; A D Friederici
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 24.884

Review 5.  Effects of aging on auditory processing of speech.

Authors:  M Kathleen Pichora-Fuller; Pamela E Souza
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 2.117

6.  Estimation of Signal-to-Noise Ratios in Realistic Sound Scenarios.

Authors:  Karolina Smeds; Florian Wolters; Martin Rung
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 1.664

7.  Speech-reception threshold for sentences as a function of age and noise level.

Authors:  R Plomp; A M Mimpen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1979-11       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Frequency selectivity and psychoacoustic tuning curves in old age.

Authors:  R G Matschke
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol Suppl       Date:  1990

9.  Identification of intonation contours by normally hearing and profoundly hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  K W Grant
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 10.  Hearing loss and aging: new research findings and clinical implications.

Authors:  Sandra Gordon-Salant
Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev       Date:  2005 Jul-Aug
View more
  7 in total

1.  Recognition of foreign-accented speech in noise: The interplay between talker intelligibility and linguistic structure.

Authors:  Dorina Strori; Ann R Bradlow; Pamela E Souza
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 2.  The Physiologic and Psychophysical Consequences of Severe-to-Profound Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Pamela Souza; Eric Hoover
Journal:  Semin Hear       Date:  2018-10-26

3.  The ability to glimpse dynamic pitch in noise by younger and older listeners.

Authors:  Jing Shen; Pamela E Souza
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Selecting auditory alerting stimuli for eagles on the basis of auditory evoked potentials.

Authors:  Benjamin Goller; Patrice Baumhardt; Ernesto Dominguez-Villegas; Todd Katzner; Esteban Fernández-Juricic; Jeffrey R Lucas
Journal:  Conserv Physiol       Date:  2022-09-16       Impact factor: 3.252

5.  Do Older Listeners With Hearing Loss Benefit From Dynamic Pitch for Speech Recognition in Noise?

Authors:  Jing Shen; Pamela E Souza
Journal:  Am J Audiol       Date:  2017-10-12       Impact factor: 1.493

6.  Older Listeners' Perception of Speech With Strengthened and Weakened Dynamic Pitch Cues in Background Noise.

Authors:  Jing Shen
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2021-01-13       Impact factor: 2.297

7.  On Dynamic Pitch Benefit for Speech Recognition in Speech Masker.

Authors:  Jing Shen; Pamela E Souza
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-10-22
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.