Literature DB >> 14597270

The role of prosodic boundaries in the resolution of lexical embedding in speech comprehension.

Anne Pier Salverda1, Delphine Dahan, James M McQueen.   

Abstract

Participants' eye movements were monitored as they heard sentences and saw four pictured objects on a computer screen. Participants were instructed to click on the object mentioned in the sentence. There were more transitory fixations to pictures representing monosyllabic words (e.g. ham) when the first syllable of the target word (e.g. hamster) had been replaced by a recording of the monosyllabic word than when it came from a different recording of the target word. This demonstrates that a phonemically identical sequence can contain cues that modulate its lexical interpretation. This effect was governed by the duration of the sequence, rather than by its origin (i.e. which type of word it came from). The longer the sequence, the more monosyllabic-word interpretations it generated. We argue that cues to lexical-embedding disambiguation, such as segmental lengthening, result from the realization of a prosodic boundary that often but not always follows monosyllabic words, and that lexical candidates whose word boundaries are aligned with prosodic boundaries are favored in the word-recognition process.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14597270     DOI: 10.1016/s0010-0277(03)00139-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cognition        ISSN: 0010-0277


  62 in total

1.  Decreased sensitivity to phonemic mismatch in spoken word processing in adult developmental dyslexia.

Authors:  Esther Janse; Elise de Bree; Susanne Brouwer
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2010-12

2.  Phonological Knowledge Guides Two-year-olds' and Adults' Interpretation of Salient Pitch Contours in Word Learning.

Authors:  Carolyn Quam; Daniel Swingley
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2010-02-01       Impact factor: 3.059

3.  Individual differences in language ability are related to variation in word recognition, not speech perception: evidence from eye movements.

Authors:  Bob McMurray; Cheyenne Munson; J Bruce Tomblin
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 2.297

4.  Prosodic cues for morphological complexity: the case of Dutch plural nouns.

Authors:  Rachèl J J K Kemps; Mirjam Ernestus; Robert Schreuder; R Harald Baayen
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2005-04

5.  Effects of prosodically modulated sub-phonetic variation on lexical competition.

Authors:  Anne Pier Salverda; Delphine Dahan; Michael K Tanenhaus; Katherine Crosswhite; Mikhail Masharov; Joyce McDonough
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2007-11

6.  Cue-integration and context effects in speech: evidence against speaking-rate normalization.

Authors:  Joseph C Toscano; Bob McMurray
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 7.  Language processing in the natural world.

Authors:  Michael K Tanenhaus; Sarah Brown-Schmidt
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2008-03-12       Impact factor: 6.237

8.  The modulation of lexical competition by segment duration.

Authors:  Keren B Shatzman; James M McQueen
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2006-12

9.  Form-to-expectation matching effects on first-pass eye movement measures during reading.

Authors:  Thomas A Farmer; Shaorong Yan; Klinton Bicknell; Michael K Tanenhaus
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2015-04-27       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Lexical activation during sentence comprehension in adolescents with history of Specific Language Impairment.

Authors:  Arielle Borovsky; Erin Burns; Jeffrey L Elman; Julia L Evans
Journal:  J Commun Disord       Date:  2013-09-18       Impact factor: 2.288

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.