Literature DB >> 21968330

Pre-operative planning for mandibular reconstruction - a full digital planning workflow resulting in a patient specific reconstruction.

Harald Essig1, Majeed Rana1, Horst Kokemueller1, Constantin von See1, Martin Ruecker1, Frank Tavassol1, Nils-Claudius Gellrich1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Reconstruction of large mandiblular defects following ablative oncologic surgery could be done by using vascularized bone transfer or, more often, primarily with simultaneous or delayed bone grafting, using load bearing reconstruction plates. Bending of these reconstruction plates is typically directed along the outer contour of the original mandible. Simultaneously or in a second operation vascularized or non-vascularized bone is fixed to the reconstruction plate. However, the prosthodontic-driven backward planning to ease bony reconstruction of the mandible in terms of dental rehabilitation using implant-retained overdentures might be an eligible solution. The purpose of this work was to develop, establish and clinically evaluate a novel 3D planning procedure for mandibular reconstruction.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three patients with tumors involving the mandible, which included squamous cell carcinoma in the floor of the mouth and keratocystic odontogenic tumor, were treated surgically by hemimandibulectomy.
RESULTS: In primary alloplastic mandible reconstruction, shape and size of the reconstruction plate could be predefined and prebent prior to surgery. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This study provides modern treatment strategies for mandibular reconstruction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21968330      PMCID: PMC3195208          DOI: 10.1186/1758-3284-3-45

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Head Neck Oncol        ISSN: 1758-3284


  23 in total

1.  Oral rehabilitation after mandibular reconstruction using an osteocutaneous fibula free flap with endosseous implants. Factors affecting the functional outcome in patients with oral cancer.

Authors:  Tateyuki Iizuka; Jörg Häfliger; Ichiro Seto; Akram Rahal; Regina Mericske-Stern; Koord Smolka
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 5.977

2.  Accuracy of treatment planning based on stereolithography in computer assisted surgery.

Authors:  Kurt Schicho; Michael Figl; Rudolf Seemann; Rolf Ewers; J Thomas Lambrecht; Arne Wagner; Franz Watzinger; Arnulf Baumann; Franz Kainberger; Julia Fruehwald; Clemens Klug
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Virtual planning of composite mandibular reconstruction with free fibula bone graft.

Authors:  André Eckardt; Gwen R J Swennen
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 1.046

4.  Vascularized bone flaps versus nonvascularized bone grafts for mandibular reconstruction: an outcome analysis of primary bony union and endosseous implant success.

Authors:  R D Foster; J P Anthony; A Sharma; M A Pogrel
Journal:  Head Neck       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 3.147

5.  Comparison of the late results of mandibular reconstruction using nonvascularized or vascularized grafts and dental implants.

Authors:  H Schliephake; R Schmelzeisen; H Husstedt; L U Schmidt-Wondera
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 1.895

6.  Prosthodontic rehabilitation of oral function in head-neck cancer patients with dental implants placed simultaneously during ablative tumour surgery: an assessment of treatment outcomes and quality of life.

Authors:  P J Schoen; G M Raghoebar; J Bouma; H Reintsema; F R Burlage; J L N Roodenburg; A Vissink
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2007-09-04       Impact factor: 2.789

7.  Point-to-point computer-assisted navigation for precise transfer of planned zygoma osteotomies from the stereolithographic model into reality.

Authors:  Clemens Klug; Kurt Schicho; Oliver Ploder; Kaan Yerit; Franz Watzinger; Rolf Ewers; Arnulf Baumann; Arne Wagner
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 1.895

8.  A comparison of vascularized fibular flap and iliac crest flap for mandibular reconstruction.

Authors:  Mustafa Yilmaz; Haluk Vayvada; Adnan Menderes; Cenk Demirdover; Ali Kizilkaya
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 1.046

9.  Use of the AO plate for immediate mandibular reconstruction in cancer patients.

Authors:  M A Schusterman; G P Reece; S S Kroll; M E Weldon
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 4.730

10.  Functional mandibular reconstruction of patients with oral cancer.

Authors:  D Buchbinder; M L Urken; C Vickery; H Weinberg; A Sheiner; H Biller
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol       Date:  1989-10
View more
  11 in total

1.  Multicenter study on the use of patient-specific CAD/CAM reconstruction plates for mandibular reconstruction.

Authors:  Frank Wilde; Henning Hanken; Florian Probst; Alexander Schramm; Max Heiland; Carl-Peter Cornelius
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2015-04-07       Impact factor: 2.924

Review 2.  [Computer-aided reconstruction of the facial skeleton : Planning and implementation in clinical routine].

Authors:  F Wilde; A Schramm
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 1.284

Review 3.  Computer-Assisted Mandibular Reconstruction using a Patient-Specific Reconstruction Plate Fabricated with Computer-Aided Design and Manufacturing Techniques.

Authors:  Frank Wilde; Carl-Peter Cornelius; Alexander Schramm
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2014-02-25

4.  Mandible reconstruction using patient-specific pre-bent reconstruction plates: comparison of standard and transfer key methods.

Authors:  Frank Wilde; Karsten Winter; Katharina Kletsch; Kai Lorenz; Alexander Schramm
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2014-05-09       Impact factor: 2.924

5.  A haptics-assisted cranio-maxillofacial surgery planning system for restoring skeletal anatomy in complex trauma cases.

Authors:  Pontus Olsson; Fredrik Nysjö; Jan-Michaél Hirsch; Ingrid B Carlbom
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2013-04-21       Impact factor: 2.924

6.  The Parametric Model of the Human Mandible Coronoid Process Created by Method of Anatomical Features.

Authors:  Nikola Vitković; Jelena Mitić; Miodrag Manić; Miroslav Trajanović; Karim Husain; Slađana Petrović; Stojanka Arsić
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2015-05-06       Impact factor: 2.238

7.  Comparison of pre-bent titanium mesh versus polyethylene implants in patient specific orbital reconstructions.

Authors:  Marcin Kozakiewicz; Piotr Szymor
Journal:  Head Face Med       Date:  2013-10-29       Impact factor: 2.151

8.  Patient-specific mental rehearsal with interactive visual aids: a path worth exploring?

Authors:  Marina Yiasemidou; Raffaele Galli; Daniel Glassman; Matthew Tang; Rahoz Aziz; David Jayne; Danilo Miskovic
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-08-24       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Patient-Specific Mandibular Reconstruction Plates Increase Accuracy and Long-Term Stability in Immediate Alloplastic Reconstruction of Segmental Mandibular Defects.

Authors:  A N Zeller; M T Neuhaus; L V M Weissbach; M Rana; A Dhawan; F M Eckstein; N C Gellrich; R M Zimmerer
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2020-01-03

10.  3D printed models in mandibular reconstruction with bony free flaps.

Authors:  Banaszewski Jacek; Pabiszczak Maciej; Pastusiak Tomasz; Buczkowska Agata; Kuczko Wiesław; Wichniarek Radosław; Górski Filip
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2018-02-02       Impact factor: 3.896

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.