Literature DB >> 25045420

Computer-Assisted Mandibular Reconstruction using a Patient-Specific Reconstruction Plate Fabricated with Computer-Aided Design and Manufacturing Techniques.

Frank Wilde1, Carl-Peter Cornelius2, Alexander Schramm1.   

Abstract

We investigated the workflow of computer-assisted mandibular reconstruction that was performed with a patient-specific mandibular reconstruction plate fabricated with computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) techniques and a fibula flap. We assessed the feasibility of this technique from virtual planning to the completion of surgery. Computed tomography (CT) scans of a cadaveric skull and fibula were obtained for the virtual simulation of mandibular resection and reconstruction using ProPlan CMF software (Materialise(®)/DePuy Synthes(®)). The virtual model of the reconstructed mandible provided the basis for the computer-aided design of a patient-specific reconstruction plate that was milled from titanium using a five-axis milling machine and CAM techniques. CAD/CAM techniques were used for producing resection guides for mandibular resection and cutting guides for harvesting a fibula flap. Mandibular reconstruction was simulated in a cadaveric wet laboratory. No problems were encountered during the procedure. The plate was fixed accurately to the residual bone without difficulty. The fibula segments were attached to the plate rapidly and reliably. The fusion of preoperative and postoperative CT datasets demonstrated high reconstruction precision. Computer-assisted mandibular reconstruction with CAD/CAM-fabricated patient-specific reconstruction plates appears to be a promising approach for mandibular reconstruction. Clinical trials are required to determine whether these promising results can be translated into successful practice and what further developments are needed.

Entities:  

Keywords:  mandibular reconstruction; patient-specific implants; patient-specific mandibular reconstruction plates

Year:  2014        PMID: 25045420      PMCID: PMC4078148          DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1371356

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr        ISSN: 1943-3875


  10 in total

1.  A simple and cost effective template for central segment reconstruction of mandible with free fibula flap.

Authors:  Prabha S Yadav; Quazi A Gazwan; Vinay K Shankhdhar; G I Nambi
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2010-11-30

Review 2.  The use of 3D imaging tools in facial plastic surgery.

Authors:  Michael R Markiewicz; R Bryan Bell
Journal:  Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 1.918

3.  Increasing bony contact and overlap with computer-designed offset cuts in free fibula mandible reconstruction.

Authors:  Nicholas T Haddock; Casian Monaco; Katherine A Weimer; David L Hirsch; Jamie P Levine; Pierre B Saadeh
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 1.046

4.  Computer-aided design and manufacturing in craniomaxillofacial surgery: the new state of the art.

Authors:  Jamie P Levine; Ashish Patel; Pierre B Saadeh; David L Hirsch
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 1.046

5.  Pre-operative planning for mandibular reconstruction - a full digital planning workflow resulting in a patient specific reconstruction.

Authors:  Harald Essig; Majeed Rana; Horst Kokemueller; Constantin von See; Martin Ruecker; Frank Tavassol; Nils-Claudius Gellrich
Journal:  Head Neck Oncol       Date:  2011-10-03

6.  Mandible reconstruction with patient-specific pre-bent reconstruction plates: comparison of a transfer key method to the standard method--results of an in vitro study.

Authors:  Frank Wilde; Marcus Plail; Christoph Riese; Alexander Schramm; Karsten Winter
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2011-05-19       Impact factor: 2.924

7.  The accuracy of virtual surgical planning in free fibula mandibular reconstruction: comparison of planned and final results.

Authors:  Steven M Roser; Srinivasa Ramachandra; Henry Blair; William Grist; Grant W Carlson; Andrew M Christensen; Katherine A Weimer; Martin B Steed
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2010-09-09       Impact factor: 1.895

8.  Titanium miniplate fixation in free flap mandible reconstruction.

Authors:  D A Hidalgo
Journal:  Ann Plast Surg       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 1.539

9.  Factors affecting the stability of screws in human cortical osteoporotic bone: a cadaver study.

Authors:  O C Thiele; C Eckhardt; B Linke; E Schneider; C A Lill
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2007-05

10.  Effects of screw and host factors on insertion torque and pullout strength.

Authors:  Ankit H Shah; Rolf G Behrents; Ki Beom Kim; Hee-Moon Kyung; Peter H Buschang
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 2.079

  10 in total
  23 in total

1.  Planning of skull reconstruction based on a statistical shape model combined with geometric morphometrics.

Authors:  Marc Anton Fuessinger; Steffen Schwarz; Carl-Peter Cornelius; Marc Christian Metzger; Edward Ellis; Florian Probst; Wiebke Semper-Hogg; Mathieu Gass; Stefan Schlager
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2017-10-28       Impact factor: 2.924

2.  Multicenter study on the use of patient-specific CAD/CAM reconstruction plates for mandibular reconstruction.

Authors:  Frank Wilde; Henning Hanken; Florian Probst; Alexander Schramm; Max Heiland; Carl-Peter Cornelius
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2015-04-07       Impact factor: 2.924

3.  Using 3D-Printed Mesh-Like Brain Cortex with Deep Structures for Planning Intracranial EEG Electrode Placement.

Authors:  Ramin Javan; Maureen Schickel; Yuanlong Zhao; Terry Agbo; Cullen Fleming; Parisa Heidari; Taha Gholipour; Donald C Shields; Mohamad Koubeissi
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 4.056

4.  Computer-aided resection and reconstruction in a case of aneurysmal bone cyst of the mandibular condylar head.

Authors:  Wenko Smolka; Ullrich Müller-Lisse; Karl Sotlar; Carl-Peter Cornelius
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2015-07-02

Review 5.  Mini-plate versus reconstruction bar fixation for oncologic mandibular reconstruction with free fibula flaps: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Nikhil Sobti; Kaleem S Ahmed; Thais Polanco; Marina Chilov; Marc A Cohen; Jay Boyle; Farooq Shahzad; Evan Matros; Jonas A Nelson; Robert J Allen
Journal:  J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg       Date:  2022-05-06       Impact factor: 3.022

6.  Mandible reconstruction using patient-specific pre-bent reconstruction plates: comparison of standard and transfer key methods.

Authors:  Frank Wilde; Karsten Winter; Katharina Kletsch; Kai Lorenz; Alexander Schramm
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2014-05-09       Impact factor: 2.924

7.  Computer-assisted versus traditional freehand technique in fibular free flap mandibular reconstruction: a morphological comparative study.

Authors:  Thibault De Maesschalck; Delphine S Courvoisier; Paolo Scolozzi
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-08-08       Impact factor: 2.503

8.  More accurate correction can be obtained using a three-dimensional printed model in open-wedge high tibial osteotomy.

Authors:  Hee-June Kim; Jaeyeong Park; Ji-Yeon Shin; Il-Hyung Park; Kyeong-Hyeon Park; Hee-Soo Kyung
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2018-03-30       Impact factor: 4.342

9.  Biomechanical In Vitro Study on the Stability of Patient-Specific CAD/CAM Mandibular Reconstruction Plates: A Comparison Between Selective Laser Melted, Milled, and Hand-Bent Plates.

Authors:  Robin Kasper; Karsten Winter; Sebastian Pietzka; Alexander Schramm; Frank Wilde
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2020-08-28

10.  Clinical Features and Treatment Modes of Mandibular Fracture at the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Shimane University Hospital, Japan.

Authors:  Hiroto Tatsumi; Eiji Nakatani; Takahiro Kanno; Yoshiki Nariai; Tatsuo Kagimura; Joji Sekine
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-09-03       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.