Literature DB >> 24810111

Mandible reconstruction using patient-specific pre-bent reconstruction plates: comparison of standard and transfer key methods.

Frank Wilde1, Karsten Winter, Katharina Kletsch, Kai Lorenz, Alexander Schramm.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Mandible reconstruction with reconstruction plates requires bending the plates during the operation and fixation using the "standard method" (ST-method). The ST-method is limited when a pathological process has perforated the mandibular outer cortex. A transfer key method (TK-method) was developed where plates are pre-bent using a patient-specific mandible model and positioned on the mandible with the help of transfer keys. The ST-method and TK-method were compared in a clinical trial.
METHODS: Mandibular reconstruction was performed on 42 patients in this study: 22 were performed using the TK-method and 20 using the ST-method. Pre- and postoperative CT scans were evaluated by measuring the distances between six corresponding landmarks on the mandibular condyles and rami. The difference between pre- and postoperative distances was used to evaluate reconstruction accuracy.
RESULTS: The median deviation of the unsigned/ absolute values of all six distances was 1.07 mm for the TK-method and 1.67 mm for the ST-method. The TK-method showed significantly better results. For the signed values, the median deviation of the six distances was -0.6 mm for the TK-method and -1.47 mm for the ST-method, indicating that the mandibles became narrower with both methods. This width difference was not statistically significant.
CONCLUSION: The TK-method was more accurate than the ST-method in a clinical trial. The TK-method was effective and accurate for mandible reconstruction using pre-bent fixation plates.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24810111     DOI: 10.1007/s11548-014-1065-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg        ISSN: 1861-6410            Impact factor:   2.924


  25 in total

1.  Delayed reconstruction of continuity defects of the mandible after tumor surgery.

Authors:  S R Schimmele
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 1.895

2.  Temporary intraoperative external fixation in mandibular reconstruction.

Authors:  Feodor Ung; James W Rocco; Daniel G Deschler
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 3.325

3.  Use of an external fixator to stabilise the proximal mandibular segments during reconstruction.

Authors:  P J Ameerally; P Hollows
Journal:  Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 1.651

4.  Temporary mandibular stabilisation during reconstruction: an alternative technique.

Authors:  Aneesh Mohindra; Manuel M Blanco-Guzman
Journal:  Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2008-11-22       Impact factor: 1.651

Review 5.  Complete rehabilitation of the mandible following segmental resection.

Authors:  Christiaan Schrag; Yang-Ming Chang; Chi-Ying Tsai; Fu-Chan Wei
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2006-11-01       Impact factor: 3.454

Review 6.  Use of the AO mandibular reconstruction plate for bridging of mandibular defects.

Authors:  R M Kellman; P J Gullane
Journal:  Otolaryngol Clin North Am       Date:  1987-08       Impact factor: 3.346

7.  Definitive mandibular replacement using reconstruction plates.

Authors:  J R Saunders; R M Hirata; D A Jaques
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 2.565

8.  External pin fixation for stabilization of the mandible--comeback of a method: historical review and first experiences with the 'mandible external fixator'.

Authors:  Carl-Peter Cornelius; Jens Bolko Augustin; Leif-Konradin Sailer
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2009-03

9.  AO/ASIF plate for mandibular reconstruction in tumor surgery: results in 20 cases.

Authors:  D Birt; J S Gruss; R A Pollock
Journal:  J Otolaryngol       Date:  1988-10

10.  Feasibility of preoperative planning using anatomical facsimile models for mandibular reconstruction.

Authors:  Corrado Toro; Massimo Robiony; Fabio Costa; Nicoletta Zerman; Massimo Politi
Journal:  Head Face Med       Date:  2007-01-15       Impact factor: 2.151

View more
  12 in total

1.  Multicenter study on the use of patient-specific CAD/CAM reconstruction plates for mandibular reconstruction.

Authors:  Frank Wilde; Henning Hanken; Florian Probst; Alexander Schramm; Max Heiland; Carl-Peter Cornelius
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2015-04-07       Impact factor: 2.924

Review 2.  3D-printing techniques in a medical setting: a systematic literature review.

Authors:  Philip Tack; Jan Victor; Paul Gemmel; Lieven Annemans
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2016-10-21       Impact factor: 2.819

Review 3.  Review of surgical resection and reconstruction in head and neck cancer. Traditional versus current concepts.

Authors:  Afnan F Alfouzan
Journal:  Saudi Med J       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 1.484

4.  Computer guided temporomandibular joint reconstruction of Kaban III hemifacial microsomia with anotia: A case report.

Authors:  Mamdouh Ahmed; Sherif Ali
Journal:  Int J Surg Case Rep       Date:  2019-03-16

5.  Validation study of 3D-printed anatomical models using 2 PLA printers for preoperative planning in trauma surgery, a human cadaver study.

Authors:  Lars Brouwers; Arno Teutelink; Fiek A J B van Tilborg; Mariska A C de Jongh; Koen W W Lansink; Mike Bemelman
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2018-06-11       Impact factor: 3.693

6.  Patient-Specific Mandibular Reconstruction Plates Increase Accuracy and Long-Term Stability in Immediate Alloplastic Reconstruction of Segmental Mandibular Defects.

Authors:  A N Zeller; M T Neuhaus; L V M Weissbach; M Rana; A Dhawan; F M Eckstein; N C Gellrich; R M Zimmerer
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2020-01-03

7.  Three-Dimensionally Printed Patient-Specific Surgical Plates Increase Accuracy of Oncologic Head and Neck Reconstruction Versus Conventional Surgical Plates: A Comparative Study.

Authors:  Wei-Fa Yang; Wing Shan Choi; May Chun-Mei Wong; Warit Powcharoen; Wang-Yong Zhu; James Kit-Hon Tsoi; Marco Chow; Ka-Wai Kwok; Yu-Xiong Su
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-06-22       Impact factor: 5.344

8.  Virtual reconstruction of orbital floor defects using a statistical shape model.

Authors:  Mathieu Gass; Marc Anton Füßinger; Marc Christian Metzger; Steffen Schwarz; Johannes Daniel Bähr; Leonard Brandenburg; Julia Weingart; Stefan Schlager
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2021-10-17       Impact factor: 2.610

9.  Soft Tissue Dehiscence Associated with a Titanium Patient-Specific Implant: A Prosthetic Solution as an Alternative to Soft Tissue Grafting.

Authors:  Sharaf Eldeen M Abbas; Mohamed A ELKhashab
Journal:  Case Rep Dent       Date:  2021-12-21

10.  Impact of Periosteal Branches and Septo-Cutaneous Perforators on Free Fibula Flap Outcome: A Retrospective Analysis of Computed Tomography Angiography Scans in Virtual Surgical Planning.

Authors:  Michael Knitschke; Anna Katrin Baumgart; Christina Bäcker; Christian Adelung; Fritz Roller; Daniel Schmermund; Sebastian Böttger; Philipp Streckbein; Hans-Peter Howaldt; Sameh Attia
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-01-19       Impact factor: 6.244

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.