Literature DB >> 25843949

Multicenter study on the use of patient-specific CAD/CAM reconstruction plates for mandibular reconstruction.

Frank Wilde1, Henning Hanken2, Florian Probst3, Alexander Schramm4, Max Heiland2, Carl-Peter Cornelius3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: For the new generation of mandibular reconstruction, patient-specific mandible reconstruction plates (PSMPs) have been developed which are milled from titanium after preoperative computer planning using CAD/CAM procedures. Resection margins and plate position are determined by surgical guides. In addition, length and shape of the plate and the number and angulation of the screw holes can be planned.
METHODS: 30 patients received such PSMP. Indication ranged from stabilization osteosynthesis, single alloplastic stand-alone reconstruction to microvascular reconstructions. Time for planning, fit of surgical guides and plates, pre-/postoperative occlusion, radiological position of the temporo mandibular joint and complications were recorded.
RESULTS: The median time for online planning was 35 min. The results concerning fit and handling of the PSMP and the surgical guides were mainly very positive. In six cases, the plan had to be adapted to the intraoperative clinical needs. The postoperative position of the condyles in the temporo mandibular fossae was regular in 28 cases. The evaluation of the occlusion was not representative due to not clearly identifiable occlusion in 2/3 of the cases. Nevertheless, complications like postoperative extraoral plate exposure, infection, graft and flap necrosis or difficulties to position the guides or the plate during surgery occurred.
CONCLUSIONS: Mandibular reconstruction with PSMP offers a broad range of opportunities and benefits compared with standard procedures and can be recommended for all kind of mandibular reconstructions. It is not yet foreseeable whether PSMP will in future become routine clinical practice for mandibular reconstruction or will be confined to selected isolated cases.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CAD/CAM; Computer-assisted surgery; Mandibular reconstruction; Patient-specific implants; Patient-specific mandible reconstruction plates; Surgical guides

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25843949     DOI: 10.1007/s11548-015-1193-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg        ISSN: 1861-6410            Impact factor:   2.924


  19 in total

Review 1.  Immediate reconstruction of continuity defects of the mandible after tumor surgery.

Authors:  A Baker; J McMahon; S Parmar
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 1.895

2.  Delayed reconstruction of continuity defects of the mandible after tumor surgery.

Authors:  S R Schimmele
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 1.895

Review 3.  Condylar axis position, as determined by the occlusion and measured by the CPI instrument, and signs and symptoms of temporomandibular dysfunction.

Authors:  S D Crawford
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 2.079

4.  A new method for computer-aided operation planning for extensive mandibular reconstruction.

Authors:  Wock Hallermann; Sigbjørn Olsen; Thibaut Bardyn; Farhan Taghizadeh; Andrej Banic; Tateyuki Iizuka
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 4.730

Review 5.  Complete rehabilitation of the mandible following segmental resection.

Authors:  Christiaan Schrag; Yang-Ming Chang; Chi-Ying Tsai; Fu-Chan Wei
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2006-11-01       Impact factor: 3.454

6.  Mandibular reconstruction with the titanium hollow screw reconstruction plate (THORP) system: evaluation of 62 cases.

Authors:  T Vuillemin; J Raveh; F Sutter
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 4.730

7.  Titanium-coated hollow screw and reconstruction plate system (THORP) in mandibular reconstruction.

Authors:  S Hellem; J Olofsson
Journal:  J Craniomaxillofac Surg       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 2.078

8.  Mandible reconstruction using patient-specific pre-bent reconstruction plates: comparison of standard and transfer key methods.

Authors:  Frank Wilde; Karsten Winter; Katharina Kletsch; Kai Lorenz; Alexander Schramm
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2014-05-09       Impact factor: 2.924

9.  Computer-assisted versus conventional free fibula flap technique for craniofacial reconstruction: an outcomes comparison.

Authors:  Mitchel Seruya; Mark Fisher; Eduardo D Rodriguez
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 4.730

10.  Feasibility of preoperative planning using anatomical facsimile models for mandibular reconstruction.

Authors:  Corrado Toro; Massimo Robiony; Fabio Costa; Nicoletta Zerman; Massimo Politi
Journal:  Head Face Med       Date:  2007-01-15       Impact factor: 2.151

View more
  30 in total

1.  Planning of skull reconstruction based on a statistical shape model combined with geometric morphometrics.

Authors:  Marc Anton Fuessinger; Steffen Schwarz; Carl-Peter Cornelius; Marc Christian Metzger; Edward Ellis; Florian Probst; Wiebke Semper-Hogg; Mathieu Gass; Stefan Schlager
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2017-10-28       Impact factor: 2.924

2.  Designing CAD/CAM Surgical Guides for Maxillary Reconstruction Using an In-house Approach.

Authors:  Toshiaki Numajiri; Daiki Morita; Hiroko Nakamura; Ryo Yamochi; Shoko Tsujiko; Yoshihiro Sowa
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2018-08-24       Impact factor: 1.355

3.  Improving mandibular reconstruction by using topology optimization, patient specific design and additive manufacturing?-A biomechanical comparison against miniplates on human specimen.

Authors:  Jan J Lang; Mirjam Bastian; Peter Foehr; Michael Seebach; Jochen Weitz; Constantin von Deimling; Benedikt J Schwaiger; Carina M Micheler; Nikolas J Wilhelm; Christian U Grosse; Marco Kesting; Rainer Burgkart
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-06-08       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Biomechanical In Vitro Study on the Stability of Patient-Specific CAD/CAM Mandibular Reconstruction Plates: A Comparison Between Selective Laser Melted, Milled, and Hand-Bent Plates.

Authors:  Robin Kasper; Karsten Winter; Sebastian Pietzka; Alexander Schramm; Frank Wilde
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2020-08-28

5.  Low-cost Design and Manufacturing of Surgical Guides for Mandibular Reconstruction Using a Fibula.

Authors:  Toshiaki Numajiri; Hiroko Nakamura; Yoshihiro Sowa; Kenichi Nishino
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2016-07-15

6.  Newly designed retentive posts of mandibular reconstruction plate in oral cancer patients based on preliminary FEM study.

Authors:  Ik Jae Kwon; Mi Young Eo; Sung Jae Park; Soung Min Kim; Jong Ho Lee
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2016-11-21       Impact factor: 2.754

Review 7.  3D-printing techniques in a medical setting: a systematic literature review.

Authors:  Philip Tack; Jan Victor; Paul Gemmel; Lieven Annemans
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2016-10-21       Impact factor: 2.819

8.  Novel condylar repositioning method for 3D-printed models.

Authors:  Keisuke Sugahara; Yoshiharu Katsumi; Masahide Koyachi; Yu Koyama; Satoru Matsunaga; Kento Odaka; Shinichi Abe; Masayuki Takano; Akira Katakura
Journal:  Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2018-03-05

9.  Bioprinting on 3D Printed Titanium Scaffolds for Periodontal Ligament Regeneration.

Authors:  Ui-Lyong Lee; Seokhwan Yun; Hua-Lian Cao; Geunseon Ahn; Jin-Hyung Shim; Su-Heon Woo; Pill-Hoon Choung
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2021-05-28       Impact factor: 6.600

10.  Rib Composite Flap With Intercostal Nerve and Internal Thoracic Vessels for Mandibular Reconstruction.

Authors:  Bin Zhang; Ke-Yi Li; Li-Cheng Jiang; Zhen Meng; Xiu-Mei Wang; Fu-Zhai Cui; Ying-Nan Zhu; Ya-Ping Wu
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 1.046

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.