Literature DB >> 27525666

[Computer-aided reconstruction of the facial skeleton : Planning and implementation in clinical routine].

F Wilde1, A Schramm2.   

Abstract

In computer-aided reconstruction of the facial skeleton, a workflow has been established involving the following steps: > diagnosis → planning and simulation → surgical procedure → validation and quality control <. In addition to clinical findings, the focus of diagnosis is on three-dimensional (3D) imaging, particularly computed tomography. Planning and simulation involves creation of a virtual model of the desired surgical outcome using special planning software. The accuracy of implant fit can be virtually verified before surgery. 3D models and virtual reconstructions can be used for manufacturing patient-specific implants. During the surgical procedure, planning must be transferred to the surgical site as accurately as possible. A number of techniques are available for this purpose, e. g., closed reduction, open reduction with the placement of anatomically preformed or patient-specific implants in combination with surgical guides, and the additional use of navigation. Validation and quality control require postprocedural 3D imaging. After reconstructions of the midface, 3D imaging should be performed even before surgery is completed. Malpositions can thus be directly corrected and unnecessary open reconstructions avoided. Mobile 3D c-arms are particularly useful for intraoperative 3D imaging. Whereas intraoperative imaging makes postoperative imaging after midface reconstruction unnecessary in many cases, postoperative 3D imaging in addition to intraoperative imaging may still be recommended after complex reconstructions of the facial skeleton.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CAD/CAM; Computer-aided surgery; Computer-assisted three-dimensional imaging; Navigation; Orbital implants

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27525666     DOI: 10.1007/s00106-016-0220-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  HNO        ISSN: 0017-6192            Impact factor:   1.284


  18 in total

Review 1.  Imaging of the midfacial and orbital trauma.

Authors:  Johannes Wikner; Björn Riecke; Alexander Gröbe; Max Heiland; Henning Hanken
Journal:  Facial Plast Surg       Date:  2014-11-14       Impact factor: 1.446

2.  Navigation-aided reconstruction of medial orbital wall and floor contour in cranio-maxillofacial reconstruction.

Authors:  Rainer Schmelzeisen; Nils Claudius Gellrich; Ralf Schoen; Ralf Gutwald; Christoph Zizelmann; Alexander Schramm
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 2.586

3.  Navigational maxillofacial surgery using virtual models.

Authors:  B Hohlweg-Majert; Ralf Schön; Rainer Schmelzeisen; Nils-Claudius Gellrich; Alexander Schramm
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Dosimetry and image quality of four dental cone beam computed tomography scanners compared with multislice computed tomography scanners.

Authors:  A Suomalainen; T Kiljunen; Y Käser; J Peltola; M Kortesniemi
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 2.419

5.  Design and development of a virtual anatomic atlas of the human skull for automatic segmentation in computer-assisted surgery, preoperative planning, and navigation.

Authors:  M C Metzger; G Bittermann; L Dannenberg; R Schmelzeisen; N-C Gellrich; B Hohlweg-Majert; C Scheifele
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2013-02-17       Impact factor: 2.924

6.  Dose measurements for dental cone-beam CT: a comparison with MSCT and panoramic imaging.

Authors:  P Deman; P Atwal; C Duzenli; Y Thakur; N L Ford
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2014-05-27       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 7.  Modern concepts in computer-assisted craniomaxillofacial reconstruction.

Authors:  Michael R Markiewicz; R Bryan Bell
Journal:  Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 2.064

8.  Toward CT-based facial fracture treatment.

Authors:  P N Manson; B Markowitz; S Mirvis; M Dunham; M Yaremchuk
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 4.730

Review 9.  3D modeling, custom implants and its future perspectives in craniofacial surgery.

Authors:  Jayanthi Parthasarathy
Journal:  Ann Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2014-01

10.  Precision of posttraumatic primary orbital reconstruction using individually bent titanium mesh with and without navigation: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Harald Essig; Lars Dressel; Majeed Rana; Madiha Rana; Horst Kokemueller; Martin Ruecker; Nils-Claudius Gellrich
Journal:  Head Face Med       Date:  2013-07-02       Impact factor: 2.151

View more
  4 in total

1.  Planning of skull reconstruction based on a statistical shape model combined with geometric morphometrics.

Authors:  Marc Anton Fuessinger; Steffen Schwarz; Carl-Peter Cornelius; Marc Christian Metzger; Edward Ellis; Florian Probst; Wiebke Semper-Hogg; Mathieu Gass; Stefan Schlager
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2017-10-28       Impact factor: 2.924

2.  Development of a facescan 3D facial reconstruction technology method for quantitative evaluation of cheilitis granulomatosa.

Authors:  Chang-Qing Mu; Shi-Qin Wang; Yang Liu; Chun-Lei Li; Xiao-Sheng Hu; Hong Hua
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-05-02       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 3.  3D Printing-Encompassing the Facets of Dentistry.

Authors:  Gunpreet Oberoi; Sophie Nitsch; Michael Edelmayer; Klara Janjić; Anna Sonja Müller; Hermann Agis
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2018-11-22

4.  Impact of Periosteal Branches and Septo-Cutaneous Perforators on Free Fibula Flap Outcome: A Retrospective Analysis of Computed Tomography Angiography Scans in Virtual Surgical Planning.

Authors:  Michael Knitschke; Anna Katrin Baumgart; Christina Bäcker; Christian Adelung; Fritz Roller; Daniel Schmermund; Sebastian Böttger; Philipp Streckbein; Hans-Peter Howaldt; Sameh Attia
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-01-19       Impact factor: 6.244

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.