Literature DB >> 17022237

Accuracy of treatment planning based on stereolithography in computer assisted surgery.

Kurt Schicho1, Michael Figl, Rudolf Seemann, Rolf Ewers, J Thomas Lambrecht, Arne Wagner, Franz Watzinger, Arnulf Baumann, Franz Kainberger, Julia Fruehwald, Clemens Klug.   

Abstract

Three-dimensional stereolithographic models (SL models), made of solid acrylic resin derived from computed-tomography (CT) data, are an established tool for preoperative treatment planning in numerous fields of medicine. An innovative approach, combining stereolithography with computer-assisted point-to-point navigation, can support the precise surgical realization of a plan that has been defined on an SL model preoperatively. The essential prerequisites for the application of such an approach are: (1) The accuracy of the SL models (including accuracy of the CT scan and correspondence of the model with the patient's anatomy) and (2) the registration method used for the transfer of the plan from the SL model to the patient (i.e., whether the applied registration markers can be added to the SL model corresponding to the markers at the patient with an accuracy that keeps the "cumulative error" at the end of the chain of errors, in the order of the accuracy of contemporary navigation systems). In this study, we focus on these two topics: By applying image-matching techniques, we fuse the original CT data of the patient with the corresponding CT data of the scanned SL model, and measure the deviations of defined parameter (e.g., distances between anatomical points). To evaluate the registration method used for the planning transfer, we apply a point-merge algorithm, using four marker points that should be located at exactly corresponding positions at the patient and at connective bars that are added to the surface of the SL model. Again, deviations at defined anatomical structures are measured and analyzed statistically. Our results prove sufficient correspondence of the two data sets and accuracy of the registration method for routine clinical application. The evaluation of the SL model accuracy revealed an arithmetic mean of the relative deviations from 0.8% to 5.4%, with an overall mean deviation of 2.2%. Mean deviations of the investigated anatomical structures ranged from 0.8 mm to 3.2 mm. An overall mean (comprising all structures) of 2.5 mm was found. The fiducial registration error of the point-merge algorithm ranged from 1.0 mm to 1.4 mm. The evaluated chain of errors showed a mean deviation of 2.5 mm. This study verifies that preoperative planning on SL models and intraoperative transfer of this plan with computer assisted navigation is a suitable and sufficiently reliable method for clinical applications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17022237     DOI: 10.1118/1.2242014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  8 in total

1.  Design and fabrication of phantoms using stereolithography for small-animal imaging systems.

Authors:  Mi-Ae Park; Robert E Zimmerman; Andrew Taberner; Michael W Kaye; Stephen C Moore
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2008-06-11       Impact factor: 3.488

2.  Use of 3-d stereolithographic models in oral and maxillofacial surgery.

Authors:  Pushkar Mehra; Jeremey Miner; Richard D'Innocenzo; Mohammed Nadershah
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2011-03-04

3.  Pre-operative planning for mandibular reconstruction - a full digital planning workflow resulting in a patient specific reconstruction.

Authors:  Harald Essig; Majeed Rana; Horst Kokemueller; Constantin von See; Martin Ruecker; Frank Tavassol; Nils-Claudius Gellrich
Journal:  Head Neck Oncol       Date:  2011-10-03

Review 4.  Clinical application of three-dimensional printing technology in craniofacial plastic surgery.

Authors:  Jong Woo Choi; Namkug Kim
Journal:  Arch Plast Surg       Date:  2015-05-14

Review 5.  Orbital Osteoblastoma: Technical Innovations in Resection and Reconstruction Using Virtual Surgery Simulation.

Authors:  Giorgio Novelli; Marco Gramegna; Gabriele Tonellini; Gabriella Valente; Pietro Boni; Alberto Bozzetti; Davide Sozzi
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2016-06-22

6.  Influence of processing parameters on mechanical properties of a 3D-printed trabecular bone microstructure.

Authors:  Morteza Amini; Andreas Reisinger; Dieter H Pahr
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater       Date:  2019-03-20       Impact factor: 3.368

7.  Vascular 3D Printing with a Novel Biological Tissue Mimicking Resin for Patient-Specific Procedure Simulations in Interventional Radiology: a Feasibility Study.

Authors:  R Kaufmann; C J Zech; M Takes; P Brantner; F Thieringer; M Deutschmann; K Hergan; B Scharinger; S Hecht; R Rezar; B Wernly; M Meissnitzer
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2022-01-07       Impact factor: 4.056

Review 8.  Three-Dimensional Printing: Basic Principles and Applications in Medicine and Radiology.

Authors:  Guk Bae Kim; Sangwook Lee; Haekang Kim; Dong Hyun Yang; Young-Hak Kim; Yoon Soo Kyung; Choung-Soo Kim; Se Hoon Choi; Bum Joon Kim; Hojin Ha; Sun U Kwon; Namkug Kim
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2016-03-02       Impact factor: 3.500

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.