Literature DB >> 21935621

Bone remodelling around the Metha short stem in total hip arthroplasty: a prospective dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry study.

Matthias Lerch1, Annelene von der Haar-Tran, Henning Windhagen, Bernd A Behrens, Patrick Wefstaedt, Christina M Stukenborg-Colsman.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: On the basis of positive clinical results with mid- and long-term follow-up using the Mayo short stem, the Metha neck-preserving stem (BBraun, Aesculap, Tuttlingen, Germany) was introduced. The purpose of this study was to validate the implant design by direct acquisition of bone remodelling data from total hip arthroplasty (THA) recipients using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA).
METHODS: After power analysis, 25 patients were included in this prospective study. Patients were examined clinically and underwent DEXA examinations preoperatively and postoperatively at one week, six months and one and two years after THA. Gruen zones were adapted to the short stem design (R1-R7).
RESULTS: The Harris Hip Score (HHS) increased significantly by 31 points. No stem had to be revised. Bone mineral density (BMD) in the greater trochanter decreased significantly from 0.78 g/cm(2) postoperatively to 0.72 g/cm(2) two years after surgery. Marginal changes were seen in the lateral distal regions (R4-R5). In the minor trochanter region, BMD increased significantly after two years by 12.9%. In the calcar region, BMD exceeded the baseline value by 6.1% two years after implantation.
CONCLUSIONS: Stress shielding seems to occur at the greater trochanter due to the vast cross-section of the implant. However, the aim of proximal load transfer of the Metha stem seems to be partially achieved. DEXA analysis revealed a concentrated load distribution on the medial portion of the femur, which is an important region to guarantee long-term implant survival.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21935621      PMCID: PMC3291759          DOI: 10.1007/s00264-011-1361-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.075


  24 in total

1.  Changes in bone mineral density in the proximal femur after cementless total hip arthroplasty. A five-year longitudinal study.

Authors:  W Brodner; P Bitzan; F Lomoschitz; P Krepler; R Jankovsky; S Lehr; F Kainberger; F Gottsauner-Wolf
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2004-01

2.  Influence of changes in stem positioning on femoral loading after THR using a short-stemmed hip implant.

Authors:  Andrew D Speirs; Markus O Heller; William R Taylor; Georg N Duda; Carsten Perka
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2007-02-01       Impact factor: 2.063

3.  Modular short-stem prosthesis in total hip arthroplasty: implant positioning and the influence of navigation.

Authors:  Arnim Braun; Djordje Lazovic; Rasmus Zigan
Journal:  Orthopedics       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 1.390

4.  Femoral bone density changes after total hip arthroplasty with uncemented taper-design stem: a five year follow-up study.

Authors:  Rocco P Pitto; Annabel Hayward; Cameron Walker; Vickie B Shim
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2009-11-28       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Effect of a stemless femoral implant for total hip arthroplasty on the bone mineral density of the proximal femur. A prospective longitudinal study.

Authors:  E Munting; P Smitz; N Van Sante; C Nagant de Deuxchaisnes; A Vincent; J P Devogelaer
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 4.757

6.  Accuracy of DEXA measurement of bone mineral density after total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  B Cohen; N Rushton
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1995-05

7.  Effect of rotation on periprosthetic bone mineral measurements in a hip phantom.

Authors:  E S Mortimer; L Rosenthall; I Paterson; J D Bobyn
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Effect of femoral stiffness on bone remodeling after uncemented arthroplasty.

Authors:  C J Sychterz; L D Topoleski; M Sacco; C A Engh
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  A conservative femoral replacement for total hip arthroplasty. A prospective study.

Authors:  B F Morrey; R A Adams; M Kessler
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2000-09

10.  Course of bone mineral content changes around cementless Zweymueller total hip arthroplasty. A 4-year follow-up study.

Authors:  P Korovessis; P Droutsas; G Piperos; A Michael; A Baikousis; M Stamatakis
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 3.067

View more
  39 in total

1.  Numeric simulation of bone remodelling patterns after implantation of a cementless straight stem.

Authors:  Matthias Lerch; Henning Windhagen; Christina M Stukenborg-Colsman; Agnes Kurtz; Bernd A Behrens; Amer Almohallami; Anas Bouguecha
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-08-31       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Neck-preserving femoral stems.

Authors:  Karthig Rajakulendran; Richard E Field
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2012-09-07

3.  Development of periprosthetic bone mass density around the cementless Metha® short hip stem during three year follow up-a prospective radiological and clinical study.

Authors:  Laura Augustin; Sarah Boller; Cathrein Bobach; Alexander Jahnke; Gafar Adam Ahmed; Markus Rickert; Bernd Alexander Ishaque
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-09-03       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Densitometric evaluation of periprosthetic bone remodeling.

Authors:  Paolo Domenico Parchi; Valentina Cervi; Nicola Piolanti; Gianluca Ciapini; Lorenzo Andreani; Iacopo Castellini; Andrea Poggetti; Michele Lisanti
Journal:  Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab       Date:  2014-09

5.  Biomechanical reconstruction of the hip: comparison between modular short-stem hip arthroplasty and conventional total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Florian Schmidutz; Marc Beirer; Patrick Weber; Farhad Mazoochian; Andreas Fottner; Volkmar Jansson
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2012-01-20       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  The accuracy of digital templating: a comparison of short-stem total hip arthroplasty and conventional total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Florian Schmidutz; Arnd Steinbrück; Lorenz Wanke-Jellinek; Matthias Pietschmann; Volkmar Jansson; Andreas Fottner
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2012-04-04       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  [Differences between short stem prostheses].

Authors:  J Jerosch
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 1.087

8.  Changes of periprosthetic bone density after a cementless short hip stem: a clinical and radiological analysis.

Authors:  Alexander Jahnke; Sandra Engl; Corinna Altmeyer; Eike Jakubowitz; Jörn Bengt Seeger; Markus Rickert; Bernd Alexander Ishaque
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-06-11       Impact factor: 3.075

9.  Periprosthetic bone remodelling of short-stem total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review.

Authors:  Shuang G Yan; Patrick Weber; Arnd Steinbrück; Xingyi Hua; Volkmar Jansson; Florian Schmidutz
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2017-11-27       Impact factor: 3.075

10.  Bone mineral density as a marker of hip implant longevity: a prospective assessment of a cementless stem with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry at twenty years.

Authors:  Giuseppe Sessa; Luciano Costarella; Calogero Puma Pagliarello; Antonio Di Stefano; Andrea Sessa; Gianluca Testa; Vito Pavone
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-10-03       Impact factor: 3.075

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.