Literature DB >> 24082876

Neck-preserving femoral stems.

Karthig Rajakulendran1, Richard E Field.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Surgeons undertaking total hip arthroplasty (THA) routinely perform a distal femoral neck resection. It has been argued that retaining the femoral neck during THA can provide mechanical and biological advantages. PURPOSES: The objectives of this study were to review: (1) the current evidence on the advantages of femoral neck preservation during THA and (2) the clinical and radiological outcome of neck-preserving femoral stems.
METHODS: A search of the English-language literature on neck-preserving THA and on the individual neck-preserving implants was performed using PubMed, Ovid SP and Science Direct.
RESULTS: Studies have indicated that neck preservation offers superior tri-planar implant stability and allows more accurate restoration of the hip geometry and biomechanics. The trend towards tissue sparing surgery has contributed to the development of bone-conserving short-stem implants that offer variable levels of neck preservation. Despite an initial learning curve, these implants have generated promising early clinical results, with low revision rates and high outcome scores. However, radiological evaluation of some neck-preserving implants has detected a characteristic pattern of proximal femoral bone loss with distal cortical hypertrophy. The long-term implications of this finding are not yet known.
CONCLUSIONS: Preserving the femoral neck during THA has biomechanical advantages. However, long-term outcome data are needed on neck-preserving femoral stems to evaluate on-going bone remodelling and assess implant performance and survival.

Entities:  

Keywords:  femoral stems; neck preservation; total hip arthroplasty

Year:  2012        PMID: 24082876      PMCID: PMC3470665          DOI: 10.1007/s11420-012-9302-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  HSS J        ISSN: 1556-3316


  44 in total

1.  Clinical and functional outcome of the Thrust Plate Prosthesis: short- and medium-term results.

Authors:  W Steens; D Rosenbaum; C Goetze; G Gosheger; R van den Daele; J Steinbeck
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 2.063

2.  Two and a half years' experience with a vitallium intramedullary hip prosthesis.

Authors:  F R THOMPSON
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1954-06       Impact factor: 5.284

3.  Metal hip joint; a new self-locking vitallium prosthesis.

Authors:  A T MOORE
Journal:  South Med J       Date:  1952-11       Impact factor: 0.954

4.  Radiological findings and clinical results of 102 thrust-plate femoral hip prostheses: a follow-up of 2 to 8 years.

Authors:  Martin L Buergi; Karl K Stoffel; Hilaire A C Jacob; Heinz H Bereiter
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 4.757

5.  Rotational stability of noncemented total hip femoral components.

Authors:  L A Whiteside; D S McCarthy; S E White
Journal:  Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ)       Date:  1996-04

6.  Torsional stability of the femoral component of hip arthroplasty. Response to an anteriorly applied load.

Authors:  D Nunn; M A Freeman; K E Tanner; W Bonfield
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1989-05

7.  Early migration and late aseptic failure of proximal femoral prostheses.

Authors:  M A Freeman; P Plante-Bordeneuve
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1994-05

8.  Long-term results with the uncemented thrust plate prosthesis (TPP).

Authors:  A H Huggler; H A Jacob; H Bereiter; M Haferkorn; C Ryf; R Schenk
Journal:  Acta Orthop Belg       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 0.500

9.  "Modes of failure" of cemented stem-type femoral components: a radiographic analysis of loosening.

Authors:  T A Gruen; G M McNeice; H C Amstutz
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1979-06       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  A femoral component with proximal HA coating. An analysis of survival and fixation at up to ten years.

Authors:  J A Skinner; P O Kroon; S Todo; G Scott
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2003-04
View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  Hip Resurfacing: International Perspectives: Review Article.

Authors:  Julien Girard
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2016-07-15

2.  Femoral neck preservation with a short hip stem produced with powder manufacturing: mid-term results of a consecutive case series.

Authors:  Marco Schiraldi; Manuel Bondi; Lodovico Renzi Brivio
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2019-01-28

3.  Long-term follow-up of 1217 consecutive short-stem total hip arthroplasty (THA): a retrospective single-center experience.

Authors:  H Wacha; G Domsel; E Herrmann
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2018-01-17       Impact factor: 3.693

4.  30-Years of experience with the cementless implanted Alloclassic CSF screw cup total hip arthroplasty system - An ultra-long-term follow-up.

Authors:  Lorenz Pisecky; Günter Hipmair; Bernhard Schauer; Nikolaus Böhler
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2019-02-28

5.  30-years of experience with the cementless implanted Alloclassic total hip arthroplasty system-An ultra-long-term follow-up.

Authors:  Lorenz Pisecky; Günter Hipmair; Bernhard Schauer; Nikolaus Böhler
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2017-11-06

6.  Comparison of Patient-Reported Outcome from Neck-Preserving, Short-Stem Arthroplasty and Resurfacing Arthroplasty in Younger Osteoarthritis Patients.

Authors:  Marius Dettmer; Amir Pourmoghaddam; Stefan W Kreuzer
Journal:  Adv Orthop       Date:  2015-05-26

7.  Periprosthetic bone density changes after MiniHipTM cementless femoral short stem: one-year results of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry study.

Authors:  Ahmet Ercan; Sherif M Sokkar; Gebhard Schmid; Timm J Filler; Ashraf Abdelkafy; Joerg Jerosch
Journal:  SICOT J       Date:  2016-11-18

8.  Total Hip Arthroplasty by the Direct Anterior Approach Using a Neck-preserving Stem: Safety, efficacy and learning curve.

Authors:  Aditya Khemka; Omar Mograby; Sarah J Lord; Zelda Doyle; Munjed Al Muderis
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2018 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.251

9.  Straight stem and threaded cup in patients under 60 years of age: 28.8-30.2 years of follow-up.

Authors:  L Pisecky; J Allerstorfer; B Schauer; G Hipmair; R Hochgatterer; N Böhler; T Gotterbarm; M C Klotz
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2020-11-26       Impact factor: 2.359

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.