Literature DB >> 12570287

Matrix method to find a new set of Zernike coefficients from an original set when the aperture radius is changed.

Charles E Campbell1.   

Abstract

A matrix method is developed that allows a new set of Zernike coefficients that describe a surface or wave front appropriate for a new aperture size to be found from an original set of Zernike coefficients that describe the same surface or wave front but use a different aperture size. The new set of coefficients, arranged as elements of a vector, is formed by multiplying the original set of coefficients, also arranged as elements of a vector, by a conversion matrix formed from powers of the ratio of the new to the original aperture and elements of a matrix that forms the weighting coefficients of the radial Zernike polynomial functions. In developing the method, a new matrix method for expressing Zernike polynomial functions is introduced and used. An algorithm is given for creating the conversion matrix along with computer code to implement the algorithm.

Year:  2003        PMID: 12570287     DOI: 10.1364/josaa.20.000209

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis        ISSN: 1084-7529            Impact factor:   2.129


  12 in total

1.  Optimal defocus estimation in individual natural images.

Authors:  Johannes Burge; Wilson S Geisler
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-09-19       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  General method to derive the relationship between two sets of Zernike coefficients corresponding to different aperture sizes.

Authors:  Huazhong Shu; Limin Luo; Guoniu Han; Jean-Louis Coatrieux
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 2.129

3.  Effects of interactions among wave aberrations on optical image quality.

Authors:  J S McLellan; P M Prieto; S Marcos; S A Burns
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2006-05-12       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Three-dimensional relationship between high-order root-mean-square wavefront error, pupil diameter, and aging.

Authors:  Raymond A Applegate; William J Donnelly; Jason D Marsack; Darren E Koenig; Konrad Pesudovs
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 2.129

5.  Comparison of laser ray-tracing and skiascopic ocular wavefront-sensing devices.

Authors:  D-U G Bartsch; K Bessho; L Gomez; W R Freeman
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2007-06-15       Impact factor: 3.775

6.  Effects of accommodation training on accommodation and depth of focus in an eye implanted with a crystalens intraocular lens.

Authors:  Humza J Tahir; Jian L Tong; Sydney Geissler; Indu Vedamurthy; Clifton M Schor
Journal:  J Refract Surg       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 3.573

7.  Normative best-corrected values of the visual image quality metric VSX as a function of age and pupil size.

Authors:  Gareth D Hastings; Jason D Marsack; Larry N Thibos; Raymond A Applegate
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  2018-05-01       Impact factor: 2.129

8.  Ocular wavefront aberrations in patients with macular diseases.

Authors:  Kenichiro Bessho; Dirk-Uwe G Bartsch; Laura Gomez; Lingyun Cheng; Hyoung Jun Koh; William R Freeman
Journal:  Retina       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 4.256

9.  Image Quality Analysis of Eyes Undergoing LASER Refractive Surgery.

Authors:  Samrat Sarkar; Pravin Krishna Vaddavalli; Shrikant R Bharadwaj
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-02-09       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Variability of wavefront aberration measurements in small pupil sizes using a clinical Shack-Hartmann aberrometer.

Authors:  Harilaos S Ginis; Sotiris Plainis; Aristophanis Pallikaris
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-02-11       Impact factor: 2.209

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.