Literature DB >> 20884491

Retinal blur and the perception of egocentric distance.

Dhanraj Vishwanath1, Erik Blaser.   

Abstract

A central function of vision is determining the layout and size of objects in the visual field, both of which require knowledge of egocentric distance (the distance of an object from the observer). A wide range of visual cues can reliably signal relative depth relations among objects, but retinal signals directly specifying distance to an object are limited. A potential source of distance information is the pattern of blurring on the retina, since nearer fixation generally produces larger gradients of blur on the extra-foveal retina. While prior studies implicated blur as only a qualitative cue for relative depth ordering, we find that retinal blur gradients can act as a quantitative cue to distance. Surfaces depicted with blur gradients were judged as significantly closer than those without, with the size of the effect modulated by the degree of blur, as well as the availability of other extra-retinal cues to distance. Blur gradients produced substantial changes in perceived distance regardless of relative depth relations of the surfaces indicated by other cues, suggesting that it operates as a robust cue to distance, consistent with the empirical relationship between blur and fixation distance.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20884491     DOI: 10.1167/10.10.26

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  11 in total

1.  Optimal defocus estimation in individual natural images.

Authors:  Johannes Burge; Wilson S Geisler
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-09-19       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Defocus blur discrimination in natural images with natural optics.

Authors:  Stephen Sebastian; Johannes Burge; Wilson S Geisler
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  Vergence driven accommodation with simulated disparity in myopia and emmetropia.

Authors:  Guido Maiello; Kristen L Kerber; Frank Thorn; Peter J Bex; Fuensanta A Vera-Diaz
Journal:  Exp Eye Res       Date:  2017-10-16       Impact factor: 3.467

4.  Perceived size change induced by audiovisual temporal delays.

Authors:  Philip Jaekl; Salvador Soto-Faraco; Laurence R Harris
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-11-22       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  The utility of defocus blur in binocular depth perception.

Authors:  Dhanraj Vishwanath
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2012-08-22

6.  Visual discomfort and depth-of-field.

Authors:  Louise O'Hare; Tingting Zhang; Harold T Nefs; Paul B Hibbard
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2013-05-16

7.  Defocus Discrimination in Video: Motion in Depth.

Authors:  Vincent A Petrella; Simon Labute; Michael S Langer; Paul G Kry
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2017-11-21

8.  Blur perception throughout the visual field in myopia and emmetropia.

Authors:  Guido Maiello; Lenna Walker; Peter J Bex; Fuensanta A Vera-Diaz
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2017-05-01       Impact factor: 2.240

9.  A Spiking Neural Network Model of Depth from Defocus for Event-based Neuromorphic Vision.

Authors:  Germain Haessig; Xavier Berthelon; Sio-Hoi Ieng; Ryad Benosman
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-03-06       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  The (In)Effectiveness of Simulated Blur for Depth Perception in Naturalistic Images.

Authors:  Guido Maiello; Manuela Chessa; Fabio Solari; Peter J Bex
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-10-08       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.