Literature DB >> 26343249

A Bayesian observer model constrained by efficient coding can explain 'anti-Bayesian' percepts.

Xue-Xin Wei1, Alan A Stocker1,2.   

Abstract

Bayesian observer models provide a principled account of the fact that our perception of the world rarely matches physical reality. The standard explanation is that our percepts are biased toward our prior beliefs. However, reported psychophysical data suggest that this view may be simplistic. We propose a new model formulation based on efficient coding that is fully specified for any given natural stimulus distribution. The model makes two new and seemingly anti-Bayesian predictions. First, it predicts that perception is often biased away from an observer's prior beliefs. Second, it predicts that stimulus uncertainty differentially affects perceptual bias depending on whether the uncertainty is induced by internal or external noise. We found that both model predictions match reported perceptual biases in perceived visual orientation and spatial frequency, and were able to explain data that have not been explained before. The model is general and should prove applicable to other perceptual variables and tasks.

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26343249     DOI: 10.1038/nn.4105

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Neurosci        ISSN: 1097-6256            Impact factor:   24.884


  36 in total

1.  Efficient coding of natural sounds.

Authors:  Michael S Lewicki
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  Bayesian integration in sensorimotor learning.

Authors:  Konrad P Körding; Daniel M Wolpert
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2004-01-15       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  An oblique illusion modulated by visibility: non-monotonic sensory integration in orientation processing.

Authors:  Vincent de Gardelle; Sid Kouider; Jérôme Sackur
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2010-08-12       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  Orientation uncertainty reduces perceived obliquity.

Authors:  Alessandro Tomassini; Michael J Morgan; Joshua A Solomon
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2009-12-21       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Maximally informative stimuli and tuning curves for sigmoidal rate-coding neurons and populations.

Authors:  Mark D McDonnell; Nigel G Stocks
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2008-08-01       Impact factor: 9.161

6.  The distribution of oriented contours in the real world.

Authors:  D M Coppola; H R Purves; A N McCoy; D Purves
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1998-03-31       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Decoding of MSTd population activity accounts for variations in the precision of heading perception.

Authors:  Yong Gu; Christopher R Fetsch; Babatunde Adeyemo; Gregory C Deangelis; Dora E Angelaki
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2010-05-27       Impact factor: 17.173

8.  Relating spatial and temporal orientation pooling to population decoding solutions in human vision.

Authors:  Ben S Webb; Timothy Ledgeway; Paul V McGraw
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2010-05-04       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  A new perceptual bias reveals suboptimal population decoding of sensory responses.

Authors:  Tom Putzeys; Matthias Bethge; Felix Wichmann; Johan Wagemans; Robbe Goris
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2012-04-12       Impact factor: 4.475

10.  How behavioral constraints may determine optimal sensory representations.

Authors:  Emilio Salinas
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 8.029

View more
  80 in total

1.  The empirical characteristics of human pattern vision defy theoretically-driven expectations.

Authors:  Peter Neri
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2018-12-04       Impact factor: 4.475

2.  Explaining the especially pink elephant.

Authors:  Jonathan W Pillow
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 24.884

3.  A Bayesian and efficient observer model explains concurrent attractive and repulsive history biases in visual perception.

Authors:  Matthias Fritsche; Eelke Spaak; Floris P de Lange
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 8.140

4.  Functional correlates of likelihood and prior representations in a virtual distance task.

Authors:  Martin Wiener; Kelly Michaelis; James C Thompson
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2016-05-11       Impact factor: 5.038

5.  Generalization of prior information for rapid Bayesian time estimation.

Authors:  Neil W Roach; Paul V McGraw; David J Whitaker; James Heron
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-12-22       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Variable precision in visual perception.

Authors:  Shan Shen; Wei Ji Ma
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2018-10-18       Impact factor: 8.934

7.  Inflation versus filling-in: why we feel we see more than we actually do in peripheral vision.

Authors:  Brian Odegaard; Min Yu Chang; Hakwan Lau; Sing-Hang Cheung
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2018-09-19       Impact factor: 6.237

8.  Attentional capture alters feature perception.

Authors:  Jiageng Chen; Andrew B Leber; Julie D Golomb
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2019-08-29       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  A Perceptual Inference Mechanism for Hallucinations Linked to Striatal Dopamine.

Authors:  Clifford M Cassidy; Peter D Balsam; Jodi J Weinstein; Rachel J Rosengard; Mark Slifstein; Nathaniel D Daw; Anissa Abi-Dargham; Guillermo Horga
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2018-02-02       Impact factor: 10.834

10.  Efficient sampling and noisy decisions.

Authors:  Joseph A Heng; Michael Woodford; Rafael Polania
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-09-15       Impact factor: 8.140

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.