Literature DB >> 20884597

Accommodation to multiple-focal-plane displays: Implications for improving stereoscopic displays and for accommodation control.

Kevin J MacKenzie1, David M Hoffman, Simon J Watt.   

Abstract

Most stereoscopic displays present images at a single focal plane, resulting in "conflicts" between the stimuli to vergence and accommodation. Minimizing these conflicts is beneficial because they can cause distorted depth percepts, visual fatigue, and reduced stereoscopic performance. One proposed solution is to present a sum of images at multiple focal planes and to vary focal depth continuously by distributing image intensity across planes-a technique referred to as depth filtering. We evaluated this digital approximation to real-world variations in focal depth by measuring accommodation responses to depth-filtered stimuli at various simulated distances. Specifically, we determined the maximum image-plane separation that supported accurate and reliable accommodation. We used an analysis of retinal-image formation to predict when responses might be inaccurate. Accommodation to depth-filtered images was accurate and precise for image-plane separations up to ∼1 diopter, suggesting that depth filtering can be used to precisely match accommodation and vergence demands in a practical display. At larger plane separations, responses broke down in a manner consistent with our analysis. We develop this approach to consider how different spatial frequencies contribute to accommodation control. The results suggest that higher spatial frequencies contribute less to the accommodation response than has previously been thought.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20884597     DOI: 10.1167/10.8.22

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  14 in total

1.  Optimal defocus estimation in individual natural images.

Authors:  Johannes Burge; Wilson S Geisler
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-09-19       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Defocus blur discrimination in natural images with natural optics.

Authors:  Stephen Sebastian; Johannes Burge; Wilson S Geisler
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  The impact of higher-order aberrations on the strength of directional signals produced by accommodative microfluctuations.

Authors:  Sangeetha Metlapally; Jianliang L Tong; Humza J Tahir; Clifton M Schor
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2014-10-23       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  Creating correct blur and its effect on accommodation.

Authors:  Steven A Cholewiak; Gordon D Love; Martin S Banks
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2018-09-04       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  Dynamic lens and monovision 3D displays to improve viewer comfort.

Authors:  Paul V Johnson; Jared Aq Parnell; Joohwan Kim; Christopher D Saunter; Gordon D Love; Martin S Banks
Journal:  Opt Express       Date:  2016-05-30       Impact factor: 3.894

6.  Stereoscopy and the Human Visual System.

Authors:  Martin S Banks; Jenny C A Read; Robert S Allison; Simon J Watt
Journal:  SMPTE Motion Imaging J       Date:  2012-05

7.  The rate of change of vergence-accommodation conflict affects visual discomfort.

Authors:  Joohwan Kim; David Kane; Martin S Banks
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2014-10-28       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  Blur and disparity are complementary cues to depth.

Authors:  Robert T Held; Emily A Cooper; Martin S Banks
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2012-02-09       Impact factor: 10.834

9.  Vergence driven accommodation with simulated disparity in myopia and emmetropia.

Authors:  Guido Maiello; Kristen L Kerber; Frank Thorn; Peter J Bex; Fuensanta A Vera-Diaz
Journal:  Exp Eye Res       Date:  2017-10-16       Impact factor: 3.467

10.  Creating effective focus cues in multi-plane 3D displays.

Authors:  Sowmya Ravikumar; Kurt Akeley; Martin S Banks
Journal:  Opt Express       Date:  2011-10-10       Impact factor: 3.894

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.