Literature DB >> 21913134

Risk factor analysis of postoperative complications after robotic rectal cancer surgery.

Jeonghyun Kang1, Byung Soh Min, Yoon Ah Park, Hyuk Hur, Seung Hyuk Baik, Nam Kyu Kim, Seung Kook Sohn, Kang Young Lee.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The robotic system has been adopted as the new modality for minimally invasive surgery for rectal cancer. However, analysis of risk factors for complications after robotic rectal cancer surgery (RRS) has been limited. This study aimed to identify the risk factors for complications after RRS.
METHODS: The records of 389 consecutive patients who underwent RRS between June 2006 and October 2010 were retrieved from our prospectively collected database.
RESULTS: The overall complication rate was 19%. The most common complication was anastomotic leakage (7.0%), followed by voiding difficulty, intrapelvic abscess, and ileus/obstruction. Multivariate analysis revealed the following as risk factors for postoperative complications: male gender, history of previous abdominal surgery, and lower tumor level (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.8, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.0-3.1, p = 0.041; HR = 2.3; 95% CI = 1.2-4.6, p = 0.012; and HR = 1.9, 95% CI = 1.1-3.3, p = 0.020, respectively). With regard to pelvic septic complications, lower tumor level, large tumor size, and preoperative chemoradiation remained variables that retained their statistical significance in multivariate analysis (HR = 2.6, 95% CI = 1.1-6.1, p = 0.029; HR = 2.7, 95% CI = 1.1-6.1, p = 0.017; HR = 2.9, 95% CI = 1.3-6.5, p = 0.007, respectively). The rate of postoperative complications was not influenced by the difference in laparoscopic surgery experience or the technique of robotic surgery.
CONCLUSION: Surgeons should be more cautious with these patient factors to optimize the benefits of robotic rectal resection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21913134     DOI: 10.1007/s00268-011-1270-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Surg        ISSN: 0364-2313            Impact factor:   3.352


  28 in total

1.  Five-year follow-up of the Medical Research Council CLASICC trial of laparoscopically assisted versus open surgery for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  D G Jayne; H C Thorpe; J Copeland; P Quirke; J M Brown; P J Guillou
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 6.939

2.  Anastomotic leakage following routine mesorectal excision for rectal cancer in a national cohort of patients.

Authors:  M T Eriksen; A Wibe; J Norstein; J Haffner; J N Wiig
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 3.788

3.  Risk factors and clinical outcome for anastomotic leakage after total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer.

Authors:  Won-Suk Lee; Seong Hyeon Yun; Young-Nam Roh; Hae-Ran Yun; Woo Yong Lee; Yong Beom Cho; Ho-Kyung Chun
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 4.  Postoperative complications following surgery for rectal cancer.

Authors:  Bogdan C Paun; Scott Cassie; Anthony R MacLean; Elijah Dixon; W Donald Buie
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Pierre J Guillou; Philip Quirke; Helen Thorpe; Joanne Walker; David G Jayne; Adrian M H Smith; Richard M Heath; Julia M Brown
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2005 May 14-20       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Short-term outcomes after robotic-assisted total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer.

Authors:  Minia Hellan; Casandra Anderson; Joshua D I Ellenhorn; Benjamin Paz; Alessio Pigazzi
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2007-09-01       Impact factor: 5.344

7.  Survival after laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: long-term outcome of a randomised clinical trial.

Authors:  Mark Buunen; Ruben Veldkamp; Wim C J Hop; Esther Kuhry; Johannes Jeekel; Eva Haglind; Lars Påhlman; Miguel A Cuesta; Simon Msika; Mario Morino; Antonio Lacy; Hendrik J Bonjer
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2008-12-13       Impact factor: 41.316

8.  Laparoscopic colectomy for cancer is not inferior to open surgery based on 5-year data from the COST Study Group trial.

Authors:  James Fleshman; Daniel J Sargent; Erin Green; Mehran Anvari; Steven J Stryker; Robert W Beart; Michael Hellinger; Richard Flanagan; Walter Peters; Heidi Nelson
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  Randomized clinical trial comparing laparoscopic and open surgery in patients with rectal cancer.

Authors:  J Lujan; G Valero; Q Hernandez; A Sanchez; M D Frutos; P Parrilla
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 6.939

10.  The learning curve for the laparoscopic approach to conservative mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: lessons drawn from a single institution's experience.

Authors:  Thierry Bege; Bernard Lelong; Benjamin Esterni; Olivier Turrini; Jerôme Guiramand; Daniel Francon; Djamel Mokart; Gilles Houvenaeghel; Marc Giovannini; Jean Robert Delpero
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 12.969

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  Robotic colorectal surgery: summary of the current evidence.

Authors:  E H Aly
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2013-09-01       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Risk factor evaluation for postoperative complications in laparoscopic colorectal surgery by a classic severity grading system.

Authors:  Xiang Xia; Gang Cen; Tao Jiang; Jun Cao; Kejian Huang; Chen Huang; Zhengjun Qiu
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2014-05-20

3.  Robotic surgery for rectal cancer: current immediate clinical and oncological outcomes.

Authors:  Sergio Eduardo Alonso Araujo; Victor Edmond Seid; Sidney Klajner
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-10-21       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 4.  Role of Minimally Invasive Surgery in the Reoperative Abdomen or Pelvis.

Authors:  Amanda Feigel; Patricia Sylla
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2016-06

5.  Initial Experience in Rectal Cancer Surgery for the Next Generation of Robotic Surgeons Trained in a Dual Console System.

Authors:  Manabu Yamamoto; Keigo Ashida; Kazushi Hara; Ken Sugezawa; Chihiro Uejima; Akimitsu Tanio; Yuji Shishido; Kozo Miyatani; Takehiko Hanaki; Kyoichi Kihara; Tomoyuki Matsunaga; Naruo Tokuyasu; Teruhisa Sakamoto; Yoshiyuki Fujiwara
Journal:  Yonago Acta Med       Date:  2021-06-23       Impact factor: 1.641

6.  Feasibility and impact on surgical outcomes of modified double-stapling technique for patients undergoing laparoscopic anterior resection.

Authors:  Jeonghyun Kang; Han Beom Lee; Jang Ho Cha; Hyuk Hur; Byung Soh Min; Seung Hyuk Baik; Nam Kyu Kim; Seung Kook Sohn; Kang Young Lee
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2013-01-04       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 7.  Robotic rectal surgery: State of the art.

Authors:  Fabio Staderini; Caterina Foppa; Alessio Minuzzo; Benedetta Badii; Etleva Qirici; Giacomo Trallori; Beatrice Mallardi; Gabriele Lami; Giuseppe Macrì; Andrea Bonanomi; Siro Bagnoli; Giuliano Perigli; Fabio Cianchi
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2016-11-15

8.  Risk Factors for Severe Complications After Laparoscopic Surgery for T3 or T4 Rectal Cancer for Chinese Patients: Experience from a Single Center.

Authors:  Li Chuan Liang; Dong Liang Liu; Shao Jun Liu; Lei Hu; Yi Ren He; Xiao Wan; Liu Liu; Zhi Qiang Zhu
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2020-08-07
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.